A research title persuades readers to study the research paper. Titles in academic research must thoroughly inform the readers of the goal of the research to entice them to look at it (Brancati, 2018). For this reason, neatly encapsulate the fundamental subject that the research covers. Moreover, list important terms linked to the research and then experiment using different permutations of the important terms to find the perfect fit for your research title.
The purpose and contents of effective abstracts
An abstract is the second part of a reader’s interaction with a research paper, after the title. Abstracts are concise reviews of the most relevant aspects of research papers (Brancati, 2018). There is a likelihood that an abstract is the only thing a reader studies about the paper so it is critical to include the research findings. There are five key contents in a research abstract: The research question, rationale for the research paper, an argument to address the research question, the methodology employed in analyzing the research question, and the findings of the study. Notably, these elements should be addressed in one or two lines in the abstract. According to Brancati (2018), an average length of an abstract is around 150 words. With that in mind, a good abstract should be sure to address all the five elements mentioned and be brief enough to captivate the audience without sounding too long to bore them.
The content of the different sections of a written research project
A research project consists of six critical parts, including an introduction, a review of related literature, the argument, techniques employed, results findings, and a conclusion, respectively. It is important to note that this does not apply to all research projects, as there may exist disparities across and within fields, as well as variations in research techniques. For this reason, scholars should follow the guidelines given and if there are none, the aforementioned elements are best suitable for the application.
The body of a research project begins with an introduction. Just as in the abstract, the research riddle, the significance of the subject, the arguments, research contribution, the technique, as well as the results should all be addressed in the introduction. The literature review gathers and evaluates contributing sources on a research subject and states what the new research by the project is going to contribute to the existing literature. At the beginning of an argument section, the thesis statement from the introductory part should be repeated. Conversely, the rest of the segment should be structured around every element of the argument in the sequence that it had been presented in the thesis statement. every paragraph should convey a single notion even though a notion may span across several paragraphs.
In the techniques employed, is critical to clarify why the technique used is suitable for the research topic addressed, as well as any restrictions it may impose on the analysis. The rationale for the selection of the sample, the benefits and drawbacks it brings for the research, and how the technique utilized in the study varies from, and provides an edge over, previous studies must be addressed. The next section is the results findings segment and the research techniques that dictate its contents. Scholars should describe the empirical evidence employed by the study in enough clarity for other researchers to duplicate the results. Visuals such as pictures, tables, and charts should be used in this section. A conclusion summarizes the findings of the study and the implications of the findings for the research subject.
Helpful Hints Regarding Writing Academic Research
Because the goal of writing academic research is to enlighten rather than convince, it is formal. It is also objective, and analytical hence emphasis should be put on rewriting, as it is the cornerstone to successful scientific research papers. Scholars should also follow set guidelines as different fields vary in the format of the research papers. Conversely, researchers should present their study to people with varied backgrounds and experiences to improve quality and delivery.
Reference
Brancati, D. (2018). Social scientific research. Sage. Web.