Introduction
Canada has a universal health care system, including policies on treatment for the elderly, assisted living facilities, physical therapy, and mental well-being. However, specifically, mental health reforms in the United States and Canada have similarities and differences. Canadians believe that admittance to medical treatment should base on demand and not the capability of spending. Therefore, it is appropriate to research Canada’s medical system because it might be suitable for introducing health care organizations.
Reason for Establishment of Mental Health Policy for Both United States and Canada
The creation of emotional health policies in the United States and Canada was motivated by the rise in mental disorders. Both countries have experienced an increase in mental health issues, therefore, these problems led to the establishment of dynamic well-being reforms (Grégoire et al., 2018). The United States has Mental Health America while Canada uses Canada Health Act to manage its citizens’ emotional health and well-being (Grégoire et al., 2018). The main aim is to handle the people experiencing emotional illness and improve general mental health.
The United States is working hard to ensure a reduction in the number of emotional illnesses in the country. Mental Health America has been operating for many years, but unfortunately, it performs poorly in protecting people from emotional diseases (Teach man et al., 2019). Similarly, in Canada, these policies have not fulfilled the main objectives. Psychological care is paid for by the patient or sorted by the private third-party cover as the government does not take care of the expenses (Grégoire et al., 2018). With such heavy responsibility left to citizens, many Canadians do not prioritize mental health.
Similarities and Differences Between Canada and United Mental Health Policies
There are several similarities in the policies of the two states. In the United States, there have recently been various vital reports advocating for efforts to advance emotional health services and care for psychiatric illnesses (Reynolds et al., 2020). Similarly, Canada has also been putting efforts into national and emotional well-being care policy to re-establish the mental health delivery system (Reynolds et al., 2020). The occurrence of a psychiatric disorder is a powerful determinant of mental health service application in both countries (Reynolds et al., 2020). In the two states, deinstitutionalization has improved the administering of emotional health services (Reynolds et al., 2020). Currently, many operations serve on an outpatient basis in general health facilities and by essential treatment physicians, psychiatrists, social workers, psychologists, and psychotherapists.
Despite the similarities in mental health policies of the two countries, there are some differences which include the following aspects. First, Canada Health covers operations done by psychiatrists who are medical doctors with professional skills in psychiatry. On the contrary, in the United States, the Affordable Care Act involves detection, early intervention, and care of emotional and substance use illnesses as a vital health benefit covered by medical insurance (Castillo et al., 2019). Secondly, in Canada, mental medical services are financed by a single-payer system whose funds derive from state and provincial levies (Castillo et al., 2019). On the other hand, in the United States, emotional well-being services are facilitated through private healthcare systems. Additionally, depression in Canada demands a top-level impairment than it does in the United States (Castillo et al., 2019). This information implies that there are more advanced cases of emotional illnesses in Canada than in the US.
Differences Involved in Managing Ethical Issues
Organizational morals include formal and informal principles of behavior that direct the conduct within the health care systems. The examples of differences involved when handling moral issues include rationalization. Medical personnel provides different rationalizations to warrant behavior that appears unethical (Gelinas et al., 2017). Another difference is that when leadership engages in non-moral activities, workers may get involved in unethical issues; hence handling these situations becomes a problem. Cultural differences also make it challenging to address ethical issues, for instance, assertiveness. Employees from low assertiveness cultures emphasize seniority and experience, which results in destructing harmony (Gelinas et al., 2017). Therefore, it becomes a problem in solving ethical issues involving such staff.
Recommendation on Whether to Establish a Healthcare Organization in Canada
The United States and Canada have common areas of mental health policies. Therefore, it would be appropriate to establish a health care organization in Canada to solve mental health issues that have is not solved with this match. Although provincial administrations have essential governance over the management and delivery of public healthcare services in this country, health ministries authorize upbeat delivery and private healthcare organizations (Vindrola, 2021). On the contrary, it might not be suitable to introduce a healthcare organization because the government policies do not favor private medical care companies.
Canada has a universal health care coverage that is efficient in the delivery of mental health services. This program has improved the connection between hospitals and provincial administrations, with medical facilities almost entirely dependent on public financing (Mattison et al., 2020). Additionally, provincial and territorial ministries of health are the main third-party financers in this country (Mattison et al., 2020). This institution setup does not imply the same purchaser-provider plans as in the National Health Service used in the United States.
Conclusion
It might not be appropriate to establish a health care organization in Canada because the universal medical system does not offer a favorable environment. Most of the medical facilities are in close connection with the provincial administration. Additionally, most citizens in Canada are used to the government funding of medical treatment, which seems to be performing well in the state. Therefore, it is not recommended to introduce a medical care organization in this country.
References
Castillo, E. G., Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R., Shadravan, S., Moore, E., Mensah, M. O., Docherty, M.,… & Wells, K. B. (2019). Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(5), 1-14.
Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using social media as a research recruitment tool: ethical issues and recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3-14.
Grégoire, S., Lachance, L., Bouffard, T., & Dionne, F. (2018). The use of acceptance and commitment therapy to promote mental health and school engagement in university students: A multisite randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 49(3), 360-372.
Mattison, C. A., Lavis, J. N., Hutton, E. K., Dion, M. L., & Wilson, M. G. (2020). Understanding the conditions that influence the roles of midwives in Ontario, Canada’s health system: an embedded single-case study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-15.
Reynolds, K., Medved, M., Mackenzie, C. S., Funk, L. M., & Koven, L. (2020). Older adults’ narratives of seeking mental health treatment: Making sense of mental health challenges and “muddling through” to care. Qualitative Health Research, 30(10), 1517-1528.
Teachman, B. A., McKay, D., Barch, D. M., Prinstein, M. J., Hollon, S. D., & Chambless, D. L. (2019). How psychosocial research can help the national institute of mental health achieve its grand challenge to reduce the burden of mental illnesses and psychological disorders. American Psychologist, 74(4), 415.
Vindrola-Padros, C. (2021). Can we re-imagine research, so it is timely, relevant, and responsive? Comment on” experience of health leadership in partnering with university-based researchers in Canada: A call to ‘re-imagine ‘research.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 10(3), 172.