Nursing Articles Critique

Quantitative Analysis of Sex Differences in Traumas

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The study does not operate the consent of the subjects since it analyzes the data based on articles reviews (Tolin & Foa, 2006).
  3. The research uses neither the names nor the private data of the subjects. Therefore, the provisions for anonymity are preserved.
  4. The analysis targets the vulnerable subjects, which suffer from traumatism.
  5. It is impossible to identify whether the subjects were coerced into participation since the data comes from diverse sources.
  6. Initially, the study framework did not presuppose any implementation risks.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area regards traumatism and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder treatment (Tolin & Foa, 2006).
  2. The problem statement reveals the idea of gender discrepancies between stress traumatism occurrence among males and females. The purpose statement aims at the verification of the hypothesis, due to which, women were more likely to suffer from PTSD than men. Finally, the research questions regard the foundation of male and female assaults that are the sources of PTSD.
  3. Such variables as the age of the participants and measurement designs are revealed in the study.
  4. The study is quantitative since it employs some mathematical models such as the DerSimonian-Laird ratio and confidence interval.
  5. The study uses an elaborate filtration of the research materials. Thus, the empirical data is relevant to the area of investigation.
  6. The feasibility of the study is revealed through the implicit correlation of study questions to the practical appliance of the data.
  7. The findings may be further used for the elaboration of trauma treatment approaches.

Literature Review Critique

  1. The research study does not outline the literature review. However, it provides information on the selection of articles, which is highly comprehensive.
  2. The account of literature selection is concise and properly structured.
  3. The research serves as the primary material for the study. Therefore, it applies to the purpose of the investigation.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Both classic and current articles are used as references.
  7. The paraphrases prevail over the direct quotes in the text.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The sources are secondary since they primarily include studies and nursing reviews.
  10. All the cited articles are presented in the reference list.
  11. There are no errors in the citation of the sources.

The Study Framework

  1. The structure that encompasses traumatism study is identified in the introductory part of the paper.
  2. The framework is based on the congregation of diverse nursing theories that regard traumas and PTSD.
  3. The framework complies with the purpose of the work.
  4. The traumatism-related concepts are defined in the study.
  5. The relationships between the concepts are not clearly described, due to the diverse nature of the study subjects.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The scientists correlate the findings to the primary assumption that was differentiated in the introduction.
  9. The outcomes of the research provide a foundation for the framework since they summarize the issues of gender traumatism.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The research study contains a primary hypothesis, due to which females are more vulnerable to stress than males.
  2. The hypothesis is clear, and it is reiterated in the body of the research as well as in the conclusion.
  3. The hypothesis is written in a declarative sentence.
  4. The hypothesis serves as a description of the primary research problem.
  5. The assumption is derived from the general nursing framework, which focuses on traumatism and PTSD.
  6. The hypothesis concerns two genders. Thus, two variables of the statement are regarded.
  7. The initial statement is directional since it stipulates the research questions as well as the selection of subjects.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The fundamental hypothesis contains two predictions.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The research design is revealed in a form of consecutive questions, which provide information about the gender specifications of traumas.
  2. The design is appropriate to the type of research since the answer to each question summarizes the critical points that are derived from the analyzed articles.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The research design allows the reader to distinguish the peculiarities of stress among the diverse groups of subjects.
  7. The experimental research design does not apply to the review of articles. However, since the study employed two mathematical models, it could have been appropriate to verify them in practice.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The qualitative design could be applied to the study if the verification of confidence interval was excluded from the research.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study has traumatism-related implications for nursing research.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The sample size was selected based on psychometric properties.
  7. Data selection procedure is described in detail.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The sample size chosen relates to the purpose of the study.
  10. The study limitations and findings are presented in separate parts of the paper.
  11. Not presented.

Developing the Model of Cancer QLQ-C30 Treatment

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. The results of the quantitative research were verified and ascertained by the Institutional Review Board.
  2. The consent was obtained from the subjects. However, 12 participants could not provide the information since they died till the end of the experiment (Aaronson et al., 1993).
  3. The data about the patients was strictly confidential.
  4. The study concerned vulnerable subjects, which suffered from cancer.
  5. The patients were likely coerced into the procedures of the experiment since the study involved the subjects, which had the 4th stage of cancer. Accordingly, such participants could not have been responsible for their responses.
  6. The study did not damage the health of the patients. Therefore, the results outweigh the participation.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area, which is cancer treatment, is identified.
  2. The problem statement regards the relation between the quality of life and a remedy for cancer. The purpose of the research is the verification of the QLQ-C30 form. The research question is whether the questionnaire provides reliable information about the functional and symptom scales.
  3. The study contains information about the variables and population.
  4. The research is quantitative since it provides an empirical investigation with statistical information.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study was confidential and did not bring harm to the subjects. Thus, it may be called ethical.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The significance of the study concerning nursing is evident, for it can be used for matching the quality of life with treatment.

Literature Review Critique

  1. The literature review is not explicitly presented in the body of the study.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources are relevant to the topic of cancer treatment.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The bibliography includes classic sources mostly.
  7. paraphrases are used more often than direct quotes.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Secondary sources are prevalent.
  10. All the cited sources are in the reference list.
  11. The references seem to be properly cited.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework of the patients’ quality of life improvement is clearly outlined.
  2. The research is based on both nursing and social studies theory.
  3. The framework corresponds to the purpose statement.
  4. The concepts that were incorporated into the form questionnaire are clearly defined.
  5. The relationships between the concepts of life quality and cancer disease are well-demonstrated.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The outcomes are related to the quality of life standards, which are outlined in the introductory part.
  9. The research findings provide a consistent framework for primary nursing research.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The study contains a hypothesis, due to which the improvement of life quality issues reduces the lethal outcomes of cancer disease.
  2. The hypothesis may be derived from the framework outline but is not directly stated.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The hypothesis determines the idea of the study.
  5. The hypothesis is identified in the general nursing framework.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The hypothesis is directional since it suggests the outcomes of the study.
  8. The hypothesis can be empirically tested both about cancer treatment and some other diseases that are influenced by the quality of life.
  9. The initial statement contains two primary predictions about the correspondence of life conditions to the outcomes of cancer treatment.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The design of the experiment is described in detail and with the account of all consecutive evaluations such as multitrait scaling, validity assessment, etc.
  2. The design of the study provides an effective response to the research questions, which aim at the evaluation of life quality measurements.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The research study possesses a non-experimental design since it analyzes the typical measurements that demonstrate the relationship between life quality and cancer treatment. Thus, the primary data is in disposure of the scientists, and there is no need to apply the experimental design to the assessment.
  8. The specifications of the patients’ health and personal conditions were employed as the means of extraneous control since the data influences the behavior of the participants as well as their responses to the questions of the analyzed form.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The study dwells on the evaluation of life conditions, which applies to the sphere of social studies. Therefore, the descriptive means of analysis, which are peculiar to the qualitative research, would be highly applicable.
  2. The scientists take into account the factor of human behavior.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study has significance for nursing, for it predetermines the quality of cancer treatment among diverse groups of patients.
  5. The scientists dwell on the specifications of the participants’ health and social backgrounds as well as their ethnic features.
  6. The sample size was determined by the questionnaire from rubrics.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The data analysis lacks descriptive features. Therefore, it is not consistent.
  10. The limitations are not presented in the paper. However, the findings are properly described.
  11. The recommendations for further nursing research are based on the outcomes of the study.

The Evaluation of Renal Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. The study possesses an official Institutional Review Board approval.
  2. The patients, who were investigated in the research, agreed with the usage of their medical data.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study targeted the cohort of hypertensive patients. Therefore, it may be claimed that the subjects are vulnerable (Rahman et al., 2006).
  5. The paper is based on the real medical data that applies to patients with ESPD. There is no sign of coercing the subjects.
  6. The outcomes had a positive influence on the health of the patients, who suffer from end-stage renal disease. Therefore, the results outweighed the risks.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research is of hypertension treatment assessment is clearly outlined.
  2. The purpose of testing treatment of hypertensive patients with calcium channel and the angiotensin-converting enzyme is revealed directly. The problem statement, as well as the research question, is not presented in the paper.
  3. People of different ages represent the variables.
  4. The study is quantitative since it operates mathematical data distribution.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The study findings make a recommendation as to the usage of chlorthalidone in the reduction of ESPD. The data may be used in subsequent research investigations.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources are based on the relevant studies of hypertension and ESPD development.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study primarily employs current articles as references.
  7. The paper represents more paraphrases than quotes.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The secondary sources are most cited.
  10. All the references are properly cited.
  11. The references contain no errors.

The Study Framework

  1. There is no explicit outline of the research framework in the study.
  2. The data is based primarily on nursing and medical theories. However, it refers to some laws of physics as well.
  3. The framework does not fully correspond to the study since there is no clear identification of the significance of the outcome.
  4. The conceptual foundation is weakly developed.
  5. Not presented.
  6. There is a propositional statement in the work. According to it, calcium channel blockers provided a more efficient treatment of hypertension than diuretics.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Not presented.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The initial hypothesis makes a recommendation as to hypertension and ESRD prevention.
  2. The hypothesis is identified. It is concise.
  3. The declarative sentence recounts the idea of the hypothesis.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The age of the patients is taken into consideration.
  7. The initial statement is directional since it predetermines the development of research.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The research study operates a single prediction.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The subsequent procedures that constitute the study design are recounted in the introductory part of the work. However, the description lacks the explanation of some critical medical terms.
  2. The quantitative research design provides consistent data that relates the usage of analyzed substances to hypertension.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The foundation of the study design involves the interrelation between the stimulators of treatment processes and their outcomes, which implies the application of cause-effect bonds between the variables.
  7. The experimental design does not apply to the situation since the medicine that was tested could produce some unexpected effects on the subjects.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The quantitative design is more appropriate for the study than the qualitative one since it suggests adequate modification outcomes, which stipulate the treatment.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The significance of the investigation results usage regards the issue of hypertension reduction, which may influence further nursing studies on the issue.
  5. The participants were selected based on their ESRD syndromes.
  6. The samples were differentiated through the estimation of hypertension effects.
  7. The study results, as well as the data that relates to the calculation of the hypertension ratio, are fully described.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The mathematical calculation of the ratios corresponds to the propositional statement.
  10. Such critical limitation as the lack of information of proteinuria level is recounted.
  11. Not presented.

The Global Burden of Diabetes

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The consent was not obtained from the participants of the study, due to the huge number of subjects.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The subjects were vulnerable since the investigation involves a wide range of diabetes-prone individuals (King, Aubert, & Herman, 1998).
  5. The paper does not contain any evidence of the subjects being coerced into the action.
  6. The results of the investigation prove cross-national information on diabetes occurrence. Therefore, the risks are considerably outweighed.
  7. The participants of the investigation were not provided with the opportunity to contact the scientists.
  8. The subjects did not receive the information about the obtaining of results.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area targets the problem of diabetes and is clearly outlined.
  2. The purpose statement outlines the objective of diabetes ration calculation. The problem statement involves the national, economic, and gender disparities in the area of diabetes occurrence. Finally, the work raises some questions as to the existence of age-specific groups of diabetes patients. All three points are carefully specified.
  3. The primary study variables of age and ethnicity, as well as population distinctions, are described in the work.
  4. The study is quantitative since it is based on the complex of ratio calculations.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study possesses a few unethical implications such as wealth distinction.
  7. The feasibility of the study is apparent from the outcomes of ration compilations.
  8. The study provides some materials for further nursing studies on the issue of diabetes.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources disclose some nursing theories and investigations and include mostly empirical data, which is relevant to the topic theory.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Mostly classic sources are provided in the reference list.
  7. The paraphrases are primarily used by the authors. The direct quotes are rare.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Since the prevalent sources regard the quality assessments and studies, the references are secondary.
  10. All sources are cited.
  11. The reference list does not contain any mistakes.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework of the diabetes assessment study is distinctively outlined in the introductory part of the work.
  2. The framework is based on a general nursing theory as well as on the basic social studies overview.
  3. The framework corresponds to the purpose statement of the work.
  4. The concept of diabetes, as well as its medical specifications, is not fully described in the work.
  5. The relationships between the analyzed conceptions are strongly developed and justified.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The scientists relate the findings of the investigation to the framework of life conditions area and the nursing implications.
  9. The findings support the initial framework assumptions.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. The general hypotheses that concern the age and gender distinctions of diabetes may be derived from the content of the study; however, they are quite wordy.
  3. The hypotheses are not written in declarative sentences.
  4. The assumptions about the specifications of the disease are related to the general study area.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Every hypothesis relates to a certain cohort of the population.
  7. The predictions that are made by the scientists guide the readers and provide the fundament for further investigation.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Each hypothesis represents several predictions. For instance, the progress of diabetes in different countries is related to the different aspects of their economic development.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The design of the work is recounted in the introductory part.
  2. The design is devised with relation to every suggestion. Specifically, it estimates the occurrence of diabetes, due to the aspects of national distribution, age, gender, and economic conditions.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The interrelations between the variables are apparent. For instance, the reader can establish the cause-effect relations between the conditions of social life in certain countries and the diabetes specifications.
  7. The experimental design would be appropriate for the verification of diabetes treatment or prevention. However, the design does not apply to the analyzed study.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. Since the study embraces multiple descriptive features and literature reviews, there is a possibility to apply qualitative research design to it.
  2. The work targets the subjective personal activities and the social backgrounds of the subjects.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study outcomes may be used as practical materials for nursing investigations as well as for the compilation of treatment planning.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The sample size was outlined through the differentiation of the social life standard ratio that prevents the infliction of diabetes.
  7. The recording of data is not provided in the work. However, the scientists describe the critical steps of the investigation.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The findings comply with the purpose of the work.
  10. The authors do not recount the limitations in the work.
  11. The basic recommendations as to the usage of the materials in diabetes treatment planning are made.

HIV/AIDS Estimation: Rural Areas Perspective

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The investigation was launched after the subjects agreed to enter the clinical study.
  3. The participants received a document, according to which their data was kept in secrecy.
  4. The subjects were represented by HIV/AIDS patients. Thus, the participants were vulnerable (Morgan et al., 2001).
  5. The subjects were not coerced into action since they were instructed by the home visitors on the content of the experiment and provided consent to become thrts of the study.
  6. The outcomes of the study revealed the calculations of HIV/AIDS rating. Therefore, the results surpassed the possible risks.
  7. The subjects had an opportunity to contact the scientists at any stage of the investigation.
  8. The participants were informed about the results of the study.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The problem area embraces the crisis of HIV/AIDS disease in the rural areas of Africa and is clearly stated.
  2. The problem statement includes the hard living conditions that contribute to the quick spread of the illness throughout the country. The purpose of the work is to estimate the progression of the disease from seroconversion to death. The research questions include the incidental character of HIV/AIDS. Thus, three components are presented.
  3. The design describes the population and the variables that were selected for the investigation.
  4. The study is quantitative since it provides the calculation of progression, which concerns HIV/AIDS development.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study was ethical since it regarded the opinions of the subjects, and their rights were respected.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The significance of the study is evident since its outcomes enrich the general theory of HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources, which are referenced in the study, concern the general medical theory on the HIV/AIDS disease and comply with the topic of the investigation.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study primarily operates current sources.
  7. The study uses paraphrases mostly, instead of direct quotations.
  8. Not presented.
  9. One may conclude that the referenced works are secondary since the paper is based on the studies and reviews.
  10. All the sources, which are used in the body of the paper, appear on the reference list.
  11. There seem to be no errors on the list of sources.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework, which embraces the medical theory of the HIV/AIDS progression, is identified.
  2. The framework is based on nursing theory, with the inclusion of some information from the social science theories.
  3. The framework matches the study and is appropriate for the HIV/AIDS progression calculation.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The findings of the research study answer the study questions. Specifically, it is concluded that the progress of HIV/AIDS illness is correlated with the living conditions in the rural districts of Africa.
  9. The study framework, therefore, is supported by the results.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The study does not include the hypothesis, except for the general assumption. Due to it, a bigger number of HIV/AIDS patients live in rural areas than in urban ones.
  2. Not presented.
  3. The hypothesis may be deduced from the content. However, it is not written in one affirmative sentence.
  4. The hypothesis is linked to the research question. Nevertheless, it does not provide any predictions as to the concrete outcomes of the progression assessment.
  5. The framework provides general information on the circumstances of HIV/AIDS occurrence, which stimulates the development of the implicit hypothesis.
  6. The hypothesis refers to the specific cohort of the population and includes the variables of age and gender.
  7. The initial assumption is not expressed in a directional form, but its connection to the framework may be derived from the introduction of the study.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The central hypothesis has only one prediction.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The design of the paper is outlined in the second part of the work. It includes the procedures of subjects’ selection and statistical analysis.
  2. The procedures that are recounted in the study assist in the calculation of the progression and provide a logical correspondence to the task.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The causative-consecutive relations between the variables are appropriate since the scientists verify the quality of life conditions and their effects on the development of the disease.
  7. The experimental design is not appropriate since the work is based on true-to-life conditions, which do not demand to build the new models.
  8. The subjects were controlled through the means of medical intervention.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The research study includes some methods of qualitative description. Therefore, the design is applicable. However, it is not possible to calculate the progression of HIV/AIDS without the employment of quantitative design.
  2. The investigation regards one of the most dreadful human diseases, which is not susceptible to full treatment. Therefore, the work appeals to human experience.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The nursing theory gains some significant data on the areas of HIC/AIDS occurrence, which contributes to the understanding of disease prevention.
  5. The process of selection of the subjects is clearly described.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The data collection process is fully represented in the work.
  8. The staff of the clinic was not informed about the names of the subjects, which created a non-bias foundation for the study.
  9. Not presented.
  10. Not presented.
  11. The general recommendation that is derived from the final part of the study concerns the methods of HIV/AIDS prevention in certain African districts.

Clinical Nursing Care Research

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The subjects were offered to take part in the studies testing model of clinical nursing quality. Therefore, the participation was a personal choice of the patients (Tourangeau et al., 2006).
  3. The names of the subjects, as well as their data, were confidential.
  4. The patients with different diseases were involved in the study. Therefore, the subjects were vulnerable.
  5. There is no evidence as to the coercing of the subjects into the action. On the opposite, the testing seems to be based on voluntary experience.
  6. The investigation put into question the qualifications of nurses. However, the results showed that several diverse factors, except for nursing performance, inflict morbidity. Thus, the outcomes outweighed the risks.
  7. The participants could contact the scientists at any stage of the investigation.
  8. The subjects had a chance to find out about the results of the investigation.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The problem area is distinct.
  2. The purpose and problem statement regard the crisis of clinic morbidity. The research questions concern the issues of nursing skills. Three elements are clearly described.
  3. The study variables and the population cohorts are presented.
  4. The work is quantitative.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study was unethical since it related the responsibility of clinical workers to the patients’ morbidity.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The study deduces the elements that hinder the progression of clinical treatment. The data may be used in further studies.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The referenced sources regard the issues of nursing care and general clinical ethics. Thus, they are appropriate to the area.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study is mostly based on the current sources.
  7. The periphrases are prevalently used.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The theory, which is regarded in the work, is based on secondary sources.
  10. All the sources are presented in the reference list.
  11. The reference list entries are free of errors.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework, which embraces the notions of clinical nursing, is clearly outlined.
  2. The work is based on general nursing and ethical theory.
  3. The framework corresponds to the purpose of the work.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The findings of the study answer the research question and justify the initial hypothesis.
  9. The results provide support for the framework and extend the research area.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The study contains the central hypothesis, due to which, the lack of nursing proficiency enhances the rates of morbidity in clinical settings.
  2. The hypothesis is not concise.
  3. The assumption is written in a long declarative sentence.
  4. The hypothesis is linked to the research area and aims at the justification of clinical treatment inefficiency.
  5. The study complies with the framework of the nursing theory.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The hypothesis does not suggest any predictions.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The procedure of entering the verification model is distinctly described.
  2. The structuring of the work complies with the initial purpose.
  3. The most appropriate design for model testing was chosen for the experiment.
  4. Not presented.
  5. The subjects were provided with the instruction in the sequence of clinical pattern verification.
  6. The cause-and-effect relations between the qualities of nursing practices and the outcomes of the treatment constitute the core of the study.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The qualitative method of research would not succeed at measuring the numerical correspondence between the morbidity rates and the categories of nursing care.
  2. The study aims at the complex investigation of complex workers’ behavior, which applies to the area of subjective human experience.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The outcomes of the study may serve as the basis for the creation of quality clinical treatment programs.
  5. The process of subjects’ selection is identified by the authors.
  6. The sample size of hospitals, which were tested, was selected for the inclusion of morbidity cases.
  7. The recordings of data compilation are recounted in the paper.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The data analysis method corresponds to the aim.
  10. The paper lacks the inclusion of limitations. For instance, the scientists do not regard the employment of temporary clinical staff.
  11. The outcomes of the study are primarily recommended for educational purposes usage.

The Role of Ramipril in Cardiovascular Risks Reduction

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The scientists received official consent from the patients before conducting an investigation.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The subjects with coronary diseases, strokes, and artery illnesses were involved in the study.
  5. There is no evidence of coercing.
  6. The benefits of results, which suggested that treatment with ramipril reduced the rates of heart diseases (Yusuf et al., 2000).
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area, which concerns the concept of cardiovascular disease risks, is clearly outlined.
  2. The problem statement outlines the crisis of heart diseases. The purpose of the work is a verification of treatment with ramipril. Finally, the research question targets the possibility of cardiovascular risks reducing.
  3. The study targets a succinct category of the population.
  4. The investigation is quantitative.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The research study area was kept in the scopes of ethical traditions.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The outcomes of the study provide a new type of cardiovascular disease treatment, which is a significant contribution to the medical nursing theory.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study regards the popular reviews of the nursing theories on the treatment of patients with cardiovascular risks, which is demonstrated by the list of references.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Both classic and current sources are cited in the paper.
  7. Prevalently, the paraphrases are employed by the authors of the work.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The study relies on a variety of secondary sources as well as some primary reports from the patients.
  10. All sources are presented in the reference list.
  11. The list of bibliography entries contains no errors.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework of the study is not fully disclosed since the authors do not provide the prerequisites for traditional cardiovascular treatment.
  2. The paper relies exclusively on nursing theories.
  3. The framework is partly appropriate for the study.
  4. Not presented.
  5. The interrelations between the evictions of cardiovascular risks and their reduction are not fully presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The study findings are related to the general framework since they answer the research question.
  9. The outcomes partly support the framework.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. It is hypothesized that the medical usage of ramipril and vitamin E reduces the risks of cardiovascular disease.
  2. The hypothesis is outlined in the introduction. However, it is rather long-winded.
  3. The initial assumption is expressed in one declarative sentence.
  4. The hypothesis targets the question of heart failure treatment and is linked to the purpose.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The central hypothesis suggests the single prediction that concerns ramipril usage.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The research report identifies two-by-two trials that evaluate vitamin E and ramipril employment.
  2. The design corresponds to the studied question and satisfies the purpose of the work.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The work tests the subsequent effects of treatment with ramipril and vitamin E.
  7. The statistical analysis, which was employed by the scientists, provided a high-quality outcome. It excludes the necessity of qualitative design usage.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The qualitative research design would not provide an opportunity for fair cardiovascular disease rating calculations.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study provides a new method of heart failure risks reduction. Therefore, it may be used in practice within clinical settings.
  5. The writers disclose the medical characteristics, as well as age specifications, due to which the participants were selected.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The scientists recount the two-step process of data measuring, which constitutes a full process of the investigation.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The method of experimental trials complies with the purpose of the study.
  10. The study limitations are not regarded by the scientists.
  11. further research suggests the inclusion of ramipril and vitamin E into the programs of treatment.

References

Aaronson, N., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N.,… Takeda, F. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365-376.

King, H., Aubert, R., & Herman, W. (1998). Global burden of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21(9), 1414-1431.

Morgan, D., Mahe, C., Mayanja, B., Okongo, J., Lubega, R., & Whitworth, J. (2001). HIV-1 infection in rural Africa: is there a difference in median time to AIDS and survival compared with that in industrialized countries. AIDS, 16(4), 597-603.

Rahman, M., Pressel, S., Davis, B., Nwachucku, C., Wright, J., Eckfeldt, H.,… & Wiegmann, M. (2005). Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs. a diuretic: A report from the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. Original Investigation, 165(8), 936-946.

Tolin, D., & Foa, E. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 959-992.

Tourangeau, A., Doran, D., Hall, L., Pallas, L., Pringle, D., & Cranley, L. (2006). The impact of hospital nursing care on 30-day mortality for acute medical patients. Journal of Advanced Research, 57(1), 32-44.

Yusuf, S., Sleight, P., Pogue, J., Bosch, J., Davies, R., & Dagenais, G. (2000). Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The heart outcomes prevention evaluation study investigators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342(3), 145-153.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, April 1). Nursing Articles Critique. https://studycorgi.com/nursing-articles-critique/

Work Cited

"Nursing Articles Critique." StudyCorgi, 1 Apr. 2022, studycorgi.com/nursing-articles-critique/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Nursing Articles Critique'. 1 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "Nursing Articles Critique." April 1, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nursing-articles-critique/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Nursing Articles Critique." April 1, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nursing-articles-critique/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Nursing Articles Critique." April 1, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nursing-articles-critique/.

This paper, “Nursing Articles Critique”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.