Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties

Mediation refers to the process where conflicting parties enter into a negotiation with the help of a third-party neutral person who helps them reach a resolution that benefits both sides. The mediator’s primary role is to help communicate, obtain necessary information from both sources, and give resolution options that the parties might apply to reach a consensus. Binding arbitration is similar to an informal court where a neutral person listens to each party’s grievances and their evidence and, subsequently, draws a conclusion (Blake et al., 2016). As an arbitrator is a neutral person, they make a fair decision that brings a long-term solution.

The majority of conflicting parties nowadays prefer to use alternative dispute resolutions such as mediation and arbitration rather than litigation in court. There are several reasons why the alternative resolution is preferred. The primary one is lowered costs, such as the witness and lawyer fees (Delgado, 2017). Another reason is the ability to solve the conflicts in a private and confidential session as opposed to the litigation processes that take place on public courts. Alternative dispute resolution also enables control and flexibility on the rules and terms that will be followed when resolving disputes compared to a litigation process that follows strict and rigid constitutional rules.

There are several disputes where sports parties may prefer to use alternative dispute resolution than litigating, which may be costly and time-consuming. Some of such disputes are salary disagreements between the players and their team management, disputes involving doping among players, and minimum salaries for a specific type of player (Kornbeck, 2017). The team management can also use the alternative resolution to solve disputes with sports federation on the matters such as game rules.

References

Blake, S. H., Browne, J., & Sime, S. (2016). A practical approach to alternative dispute resolution (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Delgado, R. (2017). The unbearable lightness of alternative dispute resolution: Critical thoughts on fairness and formality. SMU Law Review, 70(3), 611.

Kornbeck, J. (2017). Dispute resolution in sport: Athletes, law and arbitration. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 11(4), 477-480. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, June 28). Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties. https://studycorgi.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-for-sports-parties/

Work Cited

"Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties." StudyCorgi, 28 June 2022, studycorgi.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-for-sports-parties/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties'. 28 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties." June 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-for-sports-parties/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties." June 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-for-sports-parties/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties." June 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-for-sports-parties/.

This paper, “Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sports Parties”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.