It has been found that there are many short and long term affects of victimization especially in relation to fee usage of firearms. There are many short and long term affects of victimization especially in relation to adolescence. In today’s perspective an individual carries many different emotional and physical responses to sociological and economical stress and these stresses can be affected by violence and probable chance of violence. There is a constant paranoia of fear psychosis acting on the resident of an economically and sociologically developed society due to different stress. This paranoia of fear psychosis is instigated to become violent once the subject is armed with a firearm. It is easy to deem this as a trigger happy syndrome but the fact remains to be very volatile and fearful. The statistics that have been formulated in regard to continuations of violence and the sources of the violent behavior have become staggering. In November 1998, a Japanese student new in California was shot dead when he tried to find a specific address from a middle aged resident at the middle of the night due to miscommunication and language problem (King, p. 317).
Such examples are abundant and this is the reason it is necessary to look into the matter of gun control policy. Furthermore, experts amidst researchers and policymakers should managed considerable thought toward understanding how short and long term influences of abuse, including drugs, alcohol, and other substance abuse along with mental health stress. The understanding of immediate affects abuse would have, how it relates to voluntary behaviors. The main objective of the research would to develop a form of argumentative system that would be instrumental in helping out the policymakers and enable them to lead a normal logical conclusion on the subject of gun control policy and life within the main stream of the society (Lamb, p. 37).
The main objective is to develop a form of argumentative system that would be instrumental in helping out the policymakers and enable them to lead a normal logical conclusion on the subject of gun control policy and life within the main stream of the society. It is needed to formulate a policy or practice that would enable the government to determine a policy to put restriction on the guns. It s important to include population from different occupations and interview them for their views on the subject opposing the policy unrestricted access to firearms.
It is believed that the adolescents suffering from victimization goes through a huge psychological defoliation therefore it is important to address this case and the ultimate affect when some of them get free access to firearms. The government officials would be taken into consideration, specifically security and law enforcement officials, because these are the section that could convey the actual result of free access to firearms. Lastly, the general population would be considered because they are the main sufferers and it is important to incorporate their individual and social views.
Criminologists agree with each other that youth equates to violence and are alarmed because the crime prone 16-24 year-olds will be growing in numbers during the next decade. A new breed of youth “super predators” menace the nation and even hardened criminals are afraid of them. The only real solution is to spend billions of millions of new police officers and to suspend basic civil rights to ward off the onslaught of teen violence. To do that the preliminary method is to introduce a rigid law on gun control. Thus, there are simply no reasons for the authority not to pay heed to the subject (Lamb, p. 337).
It should be mentioned that there would always a segment of the population who would surely argue that the US Government should allow US citizen own guns and continue with the existing policy about firearms because regulation of firearms would certainly mean an attack on free will of the population. Furthermore, there would be arguments that ownership of firearm is a guarantee of self defense and there should be no policy that would revoke that right. Lastly, there would sill be a population that would believe that enquiring into such individual and social context while interviewing would result in violation of privacy.
Opposing member of the society on gun control argues that it is not possible to assume that each and every person would follow the proper enactment and rules of the law. Under such circumstances, it would require more wisdom to support free usage of firearms. Thus, the author openly supports in favor of gun control. The author believes that experts amidst researchers and policymakers should managed considerable thought toward understanding how short and long term influences of abuse, including drugs, alcohol, and other substance abuse along with mental health stress. The understanding of immediate affects abuse would have, how it relates to voluntary behaviors. The main objective of such text would be instrumental to develop a form of argumentative system that would be instrumental in helping out the policymakers and enable them to lead a normal logical conclusion on the subject of gun control policy and life within the main stream of the society (King, p. 225).
The gun control law is easy and highly workable within a span of a comparatively small frame of time, say a couple of months and the economic aspect behind this would be negligible too. As a result, the success of this law against gun control in the US is ready to be extremely fruitful. Sure, there are oppositions however, apart from these, as per as Ethical issues are concerned there should not be any because the law is targeted towards the greater good of the society.
Works cited
King, H. Principals Today. Auckland: HBT & Brooks Ltd, 2006.
Lamb, D. Cult to Culture: The Development of Civilization. Wellington: National Book Trust, 2004.