Summary
Among the most significant hazards to global public health that has ever existed is the tobacco pandemic. Over seven million people are killed annually by this problem, including two million fatalities from secondhand smoking exposure (Kondo et al., 2019). No degree of cigarette exposure is safe; all kinds of tobacco are toxic. Cigarette consumption contributes to several illnesses, including cancer, which significantly reduces people’s quality of life or causes death. Smoking tobacco might start an asthma attack in individuals or aggravate an existing attack (Kondo et al., 2019). Smoking has negative health impacts that affect not just the user but also every community member that shares a civilization and an economy.
Stakeholders and Their Inclusion in the Intervention
Numerous interventions are available to assist smokers in quitting. Individuals will respond differently to various cessation aids, such as prescription medicine, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and electronic cigarettes; however, attempts to stop smoking are more likely to succeed with behavioral assistance (Craig et al., 2020). Clinicians who advise smokers to stop smoking and give them pharmacological cessation aids, which are practical and affordable therapies, are among the stakeholders. Other key players in creating a media drive to promote cessation include the state and the federal governments. The government can also wholly ban tobacco promotions and advertisements and raise cigarette taxes over time while also taking steps to stop smuggling.
Primary stakeholders in the prospective intervention are smokers from areas with a substantial tuberculosis prevalence. Smokers from these areas will aid in accelerating tobacco cessation efforts and provide brief behavioral support, significantly enhancing TB patients’ outcomes who successfully stop smoking. The other parties involved in this matter, community service groups, need to change their perspective on it and make it a greater priority with their consumers. Staff members of community assistance organizations can assist their clientele in quitting smoking by taking basic steps and giving smokers quick quit-smoking information, psychological support, and inspiration, as well as directing them to a support program.
The Coalition of Multiple Interprofessional Members
Many healthcare and social organizations have made ending tobacco dependence a top priority, as seen by endorsements and active research areas. Collaboration between medical professionals lowers healthcare costs by preventing prescription mistakes, enhancing patient satisfaction, and delivering improved patient results (Kelly et al., 2020). The intervention will benefit from improving the supervision of the marginalized population of smokers’ medical coverage, illness control, and public health. Members enhance health promotion initiatives like cancer screenings, better manage chronic conditions like asthma, and show net cost savings (Kelly et al., 2020). Redirecting resources to accomplish more significant intervention will be made possible by lowering the cost of healthcare which is made possible by the coalition of multiple inter-professional members.
Strategy For Developing a Coalition
The objective of increasing the conversation on cultural competence and social justice concerning cigarette prevention and management presents both possibilities and obstacles. The initial task is to build togetherness and embrace and overcome differences. The second is to put together specific advice rather than provide oratory to the dedicated professionals who carry out the crucial public health task daily. Building up tobacco management and control policies and initiatives while promoting other essential aims of a fair society is the third and most vital problem. Every worker should receive a livable wage, everyone should have access to secure, decent housing, and each child should receive a high-quality education.
A Plan the Coalition Can Use
Although most smokers want to stop, quitting is challenging due to smoking’s addictive and habitual characteristics. The alliance can spread health literacy initiatives for smoking reduction intervention using behavioral assistance and pharmaceuticals like nicotine replacement treatment. Various delivery methods should be created to increase choice, adoption, and reach, while information and recommendations about quitting smoking remain identical among programs. The choice of a specific delivery method may depend on a person’s preferences, accessibility to the treatment, and availability (Black et al., 2020). The coalition may use quick tips, one-on-one behavioral psychotherapy, group counseling, cellphone counseling, and conscience resources.
Organization of the Interprofessional Team
The health demands of cigarette smokers are complicated, and it often takes more than a single field to meet these needs. By integrating resources, inter-professional teamwork may enable sharing of knowledge and viewpoints to achieve the shared objectives of regaining the patient’s well-being and boosting results (Kelly et al., 2020). The interprofessional team will be organized into three groups. For optimal cohesiveness and effectiveness, some professionals will be tasked with improving staff knowledge of community service organizations regarding the effects of smoking. Another group will focus on patient-centered care, which helps improve the well-being of the at-risk population. The third group will concentrate on documentation and creating awareness in society on the implications of smoking.
Strategy To Track Behavior and Policy Changes
Tracking the behavior of smokers and policy change is crucial in determining whether the intervention is effective or not. With increasing access to cessation therapy, which demonstrates that smokers are looking for assistance, the behavior change in tobacco dependence will be monitored (Black et al., 2020). Check for tight prohibitions on smoking in workplaces and public areas to keep track of policy changes. Moreover, restrictions on tobacco goods advertisement and promotion, legislative reforms on permanent price hikes calibrated to inflation, and education and anti-commercial initiatives (Tummers, 2019). With such tactics, the coalition will be equipped to monitor behavior and policy shifts and assess the efficacy of the intervention.
References
Black, N., Johnston, M., Michie, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., West, R., Viechtbauer, W., Eisma, M. C., Scott, C., & Bruin, M. (2020). Behavior changes techniques associated with smoking cessation in intervention and comparator groups of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-regression. Addiction, 115(11), 2008-2018. Web.
Craig, S. L., Eaton, A. D., Belitzky, M., Kates, L. E., Dimitropoulos, G., & Tobin, J. (2020). Empowering the team; A social work model of interprofessional collaboration in hospitals. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 19, 100-123. Web.
Kelly, P. L., Heyman, J. C., Tice-Brown, D., & White-Ryan, L. (2020). Interprofessional practice: Social work students’ perspectives on collaboration. Social Work in Health Care, 59(2), 108-121. Web.
Kondo, T., Nakano, Y., Adachi, S., & Murohara, T. (2019). Effects of tobacco smoking on cardiovascular disease. Circulation Journal, 83(10), 1980-1985. Web.
Tummers, L. (2019). Public policy and behavior change. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 925-930. Web.