Problem Background
This report seeks to explore research comparing basketball organizations in China and Spain. The authors have determined a difference in how basketball is handled in the two countries through systemic data and conclusions. The difference is evident for the under-18s (U18) but not significantly evident in U12. The similarities noted include the two countries being regional leaders, having invested a significant amount of money, and having adapted to the National Basketball Association (NBA) model without blindly following the American experience. Differences include a unique system in each country’s starting positions and Spain overweighing China in terms of game structure and organization.
Reasons Endorsing the Quality of Work for Its Defense
This paper is of high quality due to the way it has been framed, analyzed, and presented. There is adherence to academic and professional standards in almost all aspects. Firstly, the authors have done background research that opens the eyes of the audience and supplemented it with theoretical analysis. That aspect is vital as it effectively connects the topic to the reader. The article has a straightforward methodological approach that uses structured interviews with questions related to the main topic. It is crucial to use first-hand information to arrive at an empirical conclusion since that means the credibility of the research will be evident.
Secondly, the authors have explored differences and similarities based on what theoretical perspectives offer in both countries. To arrive at conclusive elements, the authors have covered thematic analysis by considering all the required components as guided by the outline. For example, as highlighted in the research, one factor that contributed to Spain’s success in basketball is youth training, which incorporates physical development and guarantees well-visible progress. Various activities such as sprints and jumps increase players’ capability. From the authors’ empirical analysis, the audience can be convinced that the paper has investigated the theme in depth.
The paper has covered other literary works that have discussed the same topic. By exploring what other studies have covered regarding a given issue, the authors assure the reader of relevance because it approaches the primary subject by basing on existing literature and gaps that seem to have been left while exploring that. Direct quotes are used to emphasize a specific matter.
For instance, the article quotes Li Yuanwei, saying “The whole meaning of Chinese basketball is to enhance the profile of the national teams…Every club must support and serve the nation’s teams without any conditions. The CBMC will use whatever resources we can to raise the profile of the national teams, regardless of the cost.” By basing an argument on direct feedback or concern, the research focuses on delivering first-hand information rich in analysis.
There is attribution to the sources used through in-text citations and bibliography pages. When the article gives credit to other researchers, the study becomes strongly supported by credible literature found online. Additionally, the paper has been outlined clearly using headings and subheadings highlighting an issue being discussed. Lastly, the article utilized conceptual illustrations such as tables and graphics to help build the audience’s textual analysis.
Contributions of the Work
Through the work, readers can deeply understand the organization of basketball in China and Spain. For example, when reading the content, one realizes various metrics involved in the sport’s success through actual events and existing government agencies that regulate the same. Through the article, the audience understands the key elements that enable the success of basketball in the two countries.
Additionally, gaps can be identified to guide the following researchers about any possible loophole that may need to be resolved. For instance, the Chinese basketball system seems reluctant to adopt the NBA model, as shown by the differences. When researchers want to explore more, they might be probed to dig deeper into why the Chinese have not yet fully aligned with the standard measures in basketball. Essential features that help a team to grow have been identified in the paper. In this case, speed, reaction, coordination, and aggressiveness have been mentioned. Thus, a future or aspiring player can be guided mentally about what it takes to be in top profile career-wise.
The study has contributed to understanding how both systems work towards achieving main goals. For instance, Spain has been credited with maintaining a relationship with its players. Hence, coaches and technical teams should not indulge in many collisions that may affect the team’s performance. The study has highlighted various factors that affect basketball games, which makes the aspect of transferability as some of the critical issues mentioned can be useful in resolving problems experienced in other sports. For example, the audience learns that when there are experienced delays in funding national teams due to economies of scale, which could demotivate players. This means the basketball system needs to be thoroughly checked in terms of economic structures that enable success.
The Originality of the Work
The work is original because the authors wrote from scratch until they developed a theme and built it to have a constant consensus. Where there are deviations, citations are used alongside inverted commas to indicate that they have applied an external statement directly. The paper is not plagiarized, meaning the article’s content has been comprehensively analyzed for general understanding. Therefore, the work satisfies the originality criteria due to the issues mentioned above.
Methodology Used
The research used qualitative data through stratified probability sampling, where information was derived using open-ended questions in questionnaires. The study has utilized the national systems approach as the organizational theory. The framework fitted the study’s theme since it allowed the creation of study dimensions, the designing of questionnaires, and the framing of interview questions. However, the model used is contentious regarding the conjecture factor because it emerges that the respondents and the researchers may have fallen prey to bias and conflict of interest, meaning the explanatory value may not represent the exact aspect. Various hypotheses are tested, such as the increase in age with the realization of differences in the basketball systems in the two countries.
The other hypothesis suggested that basketball coaches in Spain are more satisfied than those in China. These hypotheses are not strong enough to guide the entire study because they are framed from an opinion that does not provoke more research or similar studies about the topic. It is hard to ascertain what the authors perceive about basketball in China and Spain using past performances, experience, and structure of sports in the mentioned countries.
For example, the hypothesis about satisfaction lacks a parameter that shows what might be affecting the satisfaction levels of coaches in the two cases. The data collection, for that matter, means respondents might be probed to take one side of the statement without having weighed aspects that encourage deep investigation on a particular matter. Thus, this paper’s hypothesis needs to be specific and thought-provoking instead of having a simple suggestion that may be grounded in unrealistic study models.
Observations
The observed results from the article tally with the research questions and objectives and fit with the hypothesis’s general idea. The observations are articulated well using standard analysis and presentation. For example, the codes and number of quotations show varying factors that affect basketball in the two countries. However, some of the included perspectives may be difficult to justify. For instance, a research person reading the work may wonder how regional variations impact sports negatively. The article has observed that basketball players in China start at a tender age, while Spain seems to have players who start at an advanced age.
A gap in the research needs to be addressed to determine the relationship between age and a given country’s basketball performance. When China and Spain have been said to look for tools to improve basketball performance, what implications help this observation to be realistic? On the part that the two countries are drawing experience from the NBA perspective, it convinces the readers significantly since the NBA is one of the top-notch basketball systems in the world.
The study has given insights into that by showing methods used, such as implementing marketing patterns that conform to the NBA structure. The paper has been comprehensively written by incorporating relevant formations that help find the differences. The variation helps spot cultural, political, and economic issues that affect basketball.