Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David

The baroque period of the seventeenth century rejected and incorporated renaissance ideals in its art. Although Baroque art still aimed to create idealized, natural, and humanistic works, it was also designed in such a way as to intentionally evoke strong emotional responses from its viewers (Castro-Revilla, 2022). Some of the most revealing aspects of the artwork are its lighting, rich colors, arrangement, and diagonal movement through space. The Baroque artwork achieved dramatic and emotional effects that surpassed Renaissance works. Two statues of David, one by Michelangelo in 1501 and the other by Gianlorenzo Bernini in 1623, show the similarities and differences in artistic style across the renaissance and baroque periods.

The David statue by Michelangelo depicts a confident, strong young man, whereas that by Bernini shows the same character in dramatic action and determination. Despite being completely naked, Michelangelo’s David is a perfect representation of the classically idealized strong nude masculine athlete (Sanders, 2020). David is depicted in a casual, slingshot-carrying stance, yet his intense stare reveals his inner life.

As sculpted by Michelangelo, David appears to be mentally prepared for combat by knitting his brow and staring into space. Gianlorenzo Bernini’s David, on the other hand, has a very unusual three-dimensional composition and appears to be pushed into the viewer’s space. This youthful warrior is bent at the waist and twisted to one side, ready to fling the stone at Goliath (Sanders, 2020). Bernini’s more mature David, with his slim, muscular frame, tightly clenched jaw, and strained muscles, is all about tension, activity, and resolve, as opposed to Michelangelo’s contemplative young man considering the task in hand.

Michelangelo’s David shows the moments before battle and excludes props, unlike Bernini’s David, which shows the moments mid-battle. In Michelangelo’s sculpture of David, the figure appears to be gaining momentum in preparation for some upcoming event (Sanders, 2020). On the other hand, the figure in Bernini’s David does not display any reluctance as he fully unleashes this potential energy in an explosive, high-drama action characteristic of the Baroque style.

The whole effect is amazing, especially when viewed from the perspective of Goliath. Even though conversing with a marble statue, the spectator is overcome with genuine anxiety and feels compelled to take protective measures. Only when the observer gives David’s actions meaning by defeating the fictional Goliath does the sculpture come to life for them. When a viewer interacts with David, the spiritual focus shifts from the marble into the viewer’s space, erasing the distinction between the sculpture and the real world.

Both Michelangelo’s and Bernini’s depictions of David represented pioneering advances in artistic ideas. Michelangelo built a simplified version of the David statue in classical style. Although he stands alone, starkly naked, and in contrapposto, there is nothing around him to detract from his idealized beauty and consciousness. The imminence of the action and the personal difficulties of the sculpture are emphasized by Michelangelo’s skillful balancing of David’s rage with collectiveness.

Similarly, the pivotal moment of high intensity and drama depicted in Bernini’s Baroque sculpture of David is a departure from the high Renaissance style, conveying more realistic emotions and closer to nature (Sanders, 2020). Bernini’s David is an example of how art may be made to interact with its surroundings and its audience, breaking down the statue’s traditional, arrogant status as a standalone entity. Therefore, due to the different approaches that both Michelangelo and Bernini’s used, the result was remarkably distinct statutes of the same subject matter.

References

Castro-Revilla, H. M. (2022). The spirit of Baroque Art. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2829-2836. Web.

Sanders, K. (2020). Donatello, Michelangelo, and Bernini: Their Understanding of Antiquity and its Influence on the Representation of David. Department of Art and Art History, University of the Colorado. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, November 24). Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David. https://studycorgi.com/comparison-between-michelangelos-david-and-berninis-david/

Work Cited

"Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David." StudyCorgi, 24 Nov. 2023, studycorgi.com/comparison-between-michelangelos-david-and-berninis-david/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David'. 24 November.

1. StudyCorgi. "Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David." November 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/comparison-between-michelangelos-david-and-berninis-david/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David." November 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/comparison-between-michelangelos-david-and-berninis-david/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David." November 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/comparison-between-michelangelos-david-and-berninis-david/.

This paper, “Comparison Between Michelangelo’s David and Bernini’s David”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.