Introduction
The consent age is a contentious issue since different people have different ideas about what it should be. Under present law in the United Kingdom, no one under the age of 16 may participate in sexual activity. There has been discussion, however, about lowering the minimum age to 14. Consent, sexuality, and the rights of minors are just a few of the complicated and delicate issues that the age of consent debate brings up in modern culture. Concerns have been raised concerning the effects of recent shifts in communication technologies and the proliferation of sexualized media on children and young adults (L’Engle et al., 2020).
Social constructionist perspectives, which hold that childhood is a social construct rather than a permanent natural category, often frame sexuality as being incompatible with childhood. Nonetheless, conventional thinking and mainstream perspectives still hold that sexuality and childhood are inherent states. While lowering the consent age to 14 will provide greater autonomy for young people and protect them from prosecution, it might pause a greater risk of exploitation and abuse due to their lack of maturity.
Context
Due to numerous societal and technological shifts, the question of the appropriate age of consent is more pressing than ever in contemporary society. The proliferation of online platforms for dating and other sexual activities presents new difficulties in studying and controlling sexual behavior (L’Engle et al., 2020). However, in recent years, thanks in large part to high-profile cases like the Jimmy Savile scandal, people have become more aware of the effects sexual abuse and exploitation have on young people. Therefore, there have been debates about the age of consent and calls for increased protection of children and young people from sexual harm (Shepherd, 2022). The problem of sexualization, especially among young people, is a significant factor in the debate over lowering the age of consent.
For instance, in 2011, the government commissioned a report called the Bailey Review to investigate the increasing commercialization and sexualization of children. Several issues were brought to light in the research, including the influence of these trends on children’s self-esteem, body image, and mental health (Viner et al., 2018). Additionally, issues related to the rising prevalence of sexual images in the media and the marketing of sexualized products to children were brought to light by the report (Waites, 2005).
The report also revealed that more regulation of the media and advertising industries was necessary to safeguard children from inappropriate sexual content. Many governmental efforts, such as the “Sex and Relationships Education” (SRE) program established by the government of the United Kingdom, have been developed in response to these concerns (Twocock, 2019). The program’s goal is to safeguard young people by equipping them with the knowledge and skills necessary to make safe decisions about their sexual health and romantic relationships.
Arguments over the appropriate age of consent are influenced by a wide range of social and cultural factors, not just those related to sexualization. One of these factors is the dynamic nature of childhood and adolescence. The challenges that children and adolescents face in terms of their identities, relationships, and sexual behaviors have grown more nuanced and complicated as a result of changes in social and economic conditions.
While individual experiences play a role in shaping discussions about the appropriate age for sexual activity, more significant cultural and political forces also have an impact (Ucini, 2018). Some cultures have different norms when it comes to how much emphasis should be placed on safeguarding children from sexual assault, while others are more lenient in this regard. Similarly, there are divergent political views on how far the state should go in regulating citizens’ sexual orientation and other personal decisions.
Theoretical Context
The concept of childhood and sexuality as antithetical has been prevalent in Western societies for centuries, with childhood being constructed as a period of innocence and asexual purity. According to Fisher (2019), education, law, and religion are only a few examples of the social institutions that have contributed to the widespread belief that childhood is a distinct and safe developmental stage. Social constructionism provides a valuable framework for understanding the construction of childhood and sexuality as separate and opposing categories. When it comes to our views on infancy and sexuality, for example, social constructionism places a strong emphasis on the role that society and culture play in forming our knowledge of reality. Childhood and sexuality, from this point of view, are not fixed categories that depend on biology but are instead culturally and historically contingent social creations.
Social constructionism gives a critical lens through which to investigate the mainstream and common-sense ideas of childhood and sexuality that drive the present age of consent regulations in the UK, which proposed lowering the age of consent to 14. The current age of consent in the United Kingdom is 16, making it unlawful to engage in sexual behavior with anyone under that age. The reasoning behind this restriction is that minors under the age of 16 lack the mental capacity to make responsible decisions regarding sexual activity and are thus vulnerable to sexual exploitation and abuse (L’Engle et al., 2020).
This viewpoint is contested by social constructivism, which demonstrates how sexuality and childhood are not separate but rather interconnected stages of development (Waites, 2005). Children are not helpless individuals devoid of sexual sensations or desires; instead, they are rational actors who shape their own sexual identities and experiences. Like other aspects of human development, sexuality is not something to be tamed or squelched but rather something to be fostered and embraced.
Although social constructionist perspectives on infancy and sexuality are common in academic discussions, mainstream, and conventional understandings continue to perceive these states as inherent characteristics. This is seen in the common practice of viewing children merely as elements to be protected by adults rather than as autonomous subjects with the right to pursue their goals and interests (Ucini, 2018). In addition, criminalization and punishment are often applied to sexual activity before the age of consent, regardless of the circumstances.
The media, the government, and the family all play a role in perpetuating these views. Despite this, the conventional idea that children and sexuality are mutually exclusive is coming under increasing scrutiny. Researchers in the field of childhood have argued that individuals should stop thinking of childhood as a static concept and start seeing it as something that changes over time and space (Harnett et al., 2019). Children’s lives are shaped by a variety of social and cultural factors that have been brought to light by these researchers.
Arguments in Favor of Reducing the Age of Consent to 14 Years Old
Recognizing the Sexual Autonomy of Young People
Proponents of reducing the age of consent argue that recognizing young people’s sexual autonomy is central to the case for lowering the age of consent to 14. According to this viewpoint, children beyond the age of 14 should be allowed to make their own decisions regarding their bodies, including the option to participate in sexual behavior (L’Engle et al., 2020). Binnie (2018) argues that the legal age of consent, currently 16 in the UK and many other countries, strips young people of their agency and autonomy (Shepherd, 2022).
Recognizing young people’s sexual independence is congruent with human rights and bodily autonomy, which is a significant argument in favor of doing so. The United Kingdom has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which guarantees children’s rights to participate in decision-making that affects them, especially concerning their bodies (Binnie, 2018). Some who advocate for a lower age of consent say that it is an abuse of human rights to keep minors from exercising their choice.
Evidence from other nations that have enacted lower ages of consent is also used as an argument in favor of lowering the age of consent. For example, research has shown that reducing the age of consent to 14 in Germany has not increased sexual engagement among teenagers (Hess et al., 2009). Young people in nations with a younger age of consent may feel more independent and capable of making choices regarding their sexual health and behavior, according to some research (Harnett et al., 2019). However, there are counterarguments to lowering the age of consent, so keep that in mind.
Many worry that allowing minors to engage in sexual behavior before the age of 16 will put them in danger since they lack the mental maturity to make such important decisions for themselves (Fisher, 2019). One common counterargument is that minors are more susceptible to sexual coercion from their elder partners or may not fully grasp the gravity of their actions. Despite these criticisms, the argument in favor of recognizing young people’s sexual autonomy remains a strong one, with many advocates continuing to call for a reduction in the age of consent.
Protecting Young People from Prosecution
Another key argument in favor of reducing the age of consent to 14 years old is that it would protect young people from prosecution. Sexual activity with anybody under the age of 16 is prohibited by current UK legislation, and those who violate this rule are subject to prosecution and severe penalties (Hird, 2022). Consequences in terms of employment, housing, and other aspects of life may result from being included on the sex offenders register.
Binnie (2018) believes the current legal system unfairly punishes minors who engage in consensual sexual behavior with their peers and hence advocates reducing the age of consent. They point out the problems that can arise when sexual behavior between young people is criminalized, including making it more difficult for young people to get help and guidance on having safe sexual encounters and maintaining healthy relationships.
Sexual behavior amongst young individuals has resulted in criminal prosecutions and even prison sentences in some instances. For instance, in 2014, a British boy of 15 was accused of raping his 13-year-old girlfriend, even though the two had engaged in sexual activity based on mutual consent. Additionally, in 2015, a 15-year-old boy was accused of rape after having sex with his girlfriend, who was only 14 at the time.
Proponents of decreasing the age of consent claim that incidents like these demonstrate the need for reform in the legislation and that lowering the age of consent to 14 would be a significant step toward safeguarding young people from prosecution. They claim that there is no evidence raising the age of consent to 14 has led to an increase in cases of sexual exploitation or abuse of adolescents in countries where it is currently the case, such as Germany and Italy.
Opponents of this view, however, point out that lowering the age of consent would not make young people safer from prosecution. Instead, they claim it could increase ambiguity over what is and is not legal. For instance, in a sexual relationship between a 14-year-old and an adult, it could be hard to tell if the younger partner is being pushed or pressured into the relationship.
Similarly, opponents of decreasing the age of consent point out that doing so may hamper efforts to bring those responsible for the sexual abuse or exploitation of minors to justice (Farley et al., 2021). They claim that if the age of consent were lowered, society would be sending the message that sexual intercourse with minors is permissible, which could encourage predators to act on their urges (Coy et al., 2013). In addition, those who are accused of sexual misconduct with a juvenile may try to defend themselves by claiming that the minor gave their consent. This could make it more difficult for law enforcement to prove that the sexual encounter was non-consensual.
Arguments Against Reducing the Age of Consent to 14 Years Old in the UK
Lack of Maturity and Understanding
Concerns regarding the immaturity and lack of comprehension of adolescents at this age are frequently at the heart of the argument against lowering the consent age to 14. This view holds that adolescents are too immature, both mentally and emotionally, to participate in sexual activities with adults without being at risk of being exploited or coerced (Fisher, 2019). Concerns have been raised that teenagers at the age of 14 may not be mature enough to completely comprehend the mental and physical repercussions of sexual activity (Viner et al., 2018).
According to Ringrose et al. (2018), the prefrontal cortex, which is essential for making decisions and controlling one’s impulses, is just one example of a region of the brain that is not fully grown until a person is in their early to mid-20s. Due to their immaturity, Bunting (2019) argues that teenagers may have trouble weighing the benefits of sexual engagement against the risks it poses. This argument is based on the assumption that sexual activities require a level of maturity and understanding that many 14-year-olds may not possess, making them vulnerable to coercion, manipulation, or sexual exploitation.
Moreover, teenagers’ lack of emotional maturity may prevent them from effectively managing intricate sexual relationships. Adolescents may be more sensitive to peer pressure and the need to fit in with their social group because they are still developing their sense of self (Bunting, 2019). Because of this, individuals may engage in sexual acts with which they are not yet familiar or for which they lack comfort. For example, a 14-year-old may feel forced to participate in sexual activities with an older partner and may lack the self-assurance and boldness to reject such sexual approaches. Concerns have also been raised about the potential for unwanted pregnancy and other health problems among teenagers who start having sexual relationships at a young age. Young people who start having sexual relations at a younger age are more likely to engage in risky sexual practices and have more excellent rates of sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies than their more mature peers.
Some critics worry that if the UK government lowers the age of consent, it will become the norm for young people to have sexual interactions with adults, which can lead to exploitation and abuse. Adults who have sex with minors may abuse their power and take advantage of their partners because they believe that the minors will not grasp the severity of their acts (Sexual Wellbeing. i.e., n.d). This imbalance of power makes it more challenging for young people to set boundaries, which in turn increases the risk that they will be pressured or forced into sexual activities they do not want to engage in.
According to Farley et al. (2021), cases of child sexual exploitation are illustrative of this phenomenon since they include young individuals who are especially susceptible to being exploited because of their disadvantageous socioeconomic circumstances. It is possible that these minors will be deceived or pressured into sexual relationships with their abusers and that they will not wholly grasp the seriousness of the situation until it is too late.
Sexual Coercion and Exploitation and Abuse
The potential for sexual coercion, exploitation, and abuse among young people has been a significant reason for opponents of lowering the age of consent in the United Kingdom. According to Farley et al. (2021, adolescents between the ages of 14 and 15 are more vulnerable to being pressured into sexual behaviors they are not ready for or may regret later. Sexual abuse and coercion are more common among adolescents, according to the available research (Harnett et al., 2019). According to data from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), 31% of young women aged 18–24 who have experienced sexual abuse were younger than 16 when it first occurred (NSPCC, 2022). Based on this evidence, lowering the age of consent could put minors in danger of sexual exploitation and abuse.
It is also worth noting that young individuals are especially vulnerable to the effects of social pressure and influence. Teenagers may engage in sexual activity before they are emotionally or mentally ready to do so, according to studies, to fit in with their friends or to obtain social status (Viner et al., 2018). According to Bunting (2019), lowering the age of consent could put more pressure on young people to take part in sexual activity before they are ready, which would only make the situation worse. It is also worth considering the power dynamics between older and younger individuals (Sexual Wellbeing. i.e., n.d.). The greater authority and influence of an older partner might put pressure on or even compel a younger partner into sexual intercourse.
When the older person is in a position of authority, such as a teacher or coach, the power dynamic can become much more problematic. For example, a former Somerset, England, school principal who admitted to sexually assaulting two boys younger than 14 received a nine-year sentence in the year 2020 (BBC News, 2020). In light of the potential for abuse of power in interactions between minors and adults, it is clear that a higher age of consent is necessary to safeguard minors from harm. Furthermore, young people who have been subjected to sexual abuse or coercion may endure long-term consequences, including sex health disorders and challenges forging healthy relationships as adults (Elkin, 2020). A persuasive argument against lowering the age of consent to 14 is that this highlights the need to protect young people from sexual exploitation and abuse.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the issue of the legal age of consent in the United Kingdom is contentious and nuanced, with passionate advocates for both sides. On the one hand, lowering the age of consent to 14 would reflect shifting cultural ideas and conventions about sexuality while also acknowledging young people’s autonomy and sexual rights. However, the risk of exploitation and abuse by adults is a significant concern, as is the potential impact on the mental and emotional wellbeing of young people who may not be fully equipped to navigate the complexities of sexual relationships.
In the end, the argument over reducing the legal age of consent in the UK to 14 is nuanced and contentious. Respecting the sexual rights and agency of young people while also keeping them safe from abuse and exploitation requires a delicate balancing act that takes into account shifting social norms and attitudes towards sexuality. Any conclusion reached on this issue must be grounded in thoroughly examining all relevant data and the opinions of affected parties. It needs to think about the myriad cultural and societal factors that influence how ideas about childhood and sexuality are formed.
References
BBC News. (2020). Former headmaster jailed for sex assault on boys. BBC News. Web.
Binnie, J. (2018). Lowering the age of consent: reflections on an old problem. Porn Studies, 5(4), 457-461. Web.
Bunting, M. (2019). Lowering the age of consent would be a terrible mistake. The Guardian. Web.
Coy, M., Kelly, L., Elvines, F., Garner, M., & Kanyeredzi, A. (2013). Sex without consent, I suppose that is rape: how young people in England understand sexual consent. Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
Elkin, M. (2020). Child sexual abuse in England and Wales: year ending March 2019. Sage. Web.
Farley, C., Lynskey, M. T., & Ward, J. (2021). Rethinking the age of sexual consent: the gap between legal and social understandings. British Journal of Criminology, 61(2), 263-282.
Fisher, H. (2019). Early sexual activity and negative mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(6), 679-680. Web.
Harnett, P. H., Pierce, M. W., & Krysinska, K. (2019). Sex education in schools: A conceptual analysis of contemporary issues and challenges. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 5-20. Web.
Hird, M. J. (2022). Childhood sexualisation: a critical review of the literature. Child Abuse Review, 31(1), 42-56. Web.
L’Engle, K. L., Mangone, E. R., & Puett, R. C. (2020). The impact of digital communication technologies on sexual health education and decision-making among adolescents. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 11(3), 29-39. Web.
NSPCC. (2022). History of child protection in the UK. Web.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2018). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 19(2), 171-190.
Sexualwellbeing.ie. (n.d.). Legal age of consent. Web.
Shepherd, T. (2022). What have we learned from 50 years of studying porn? ‘Heterosexuality is essentially broken.’ The Guardian, 10(1), 1-10. Web.
Twocock, P. (2019). At last, a generation of schoolchildren will grow up knowing it’s OK to be LGBT. The Guardian, 10(1), 1-10. Web.
Ucini, A. (2018). Concern about “sexualised” children often misses the point. The Economist, 438(9222), 1-35. Web.
Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2018). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641-1652.
Waites, M. (2005). The age of consent. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Web.