Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom

Classroom dialogue between the teacher and students is an effective and valuable tool for learning, understanding, and assessment. It allows children to discuss their experiences and express their own points of view while also encouraging them to understand why they have those points of view. The exchange of opinions that occurs during such communication allows for the discussion of different perspectives. The teacher can use this approach to help participants get a better knowledge of their own and other people’s perspectives on a topic or situation.

Easy-to-understand stories and books with a clear moral that the author wants to convey can be a good basis for such discussions and can help children understand complex and abstract topics such as peace, justice, support, responsibility, respect, and many others. One such book Cowhey (2006) suggests is Farmer Duck. It depicts the story of a lazy farmer and a diligent duck who performs all of his work for him (Waddell, 2020). The duck is very tired, and the rest of the animals unite to help her and drive away the lazy farmer. Together, they begin to take care of their farm.

To start a dialogue with the class about this book, I would first ask whether the animals did the right thing in driving the farmer away. Then I would ask how the children think and why they did it. This can help them consider the various causes of the farmer’s destructive behavior that negatively impacted the fictional farm community. I would also invite the children to think about what would have happened if the animals had not come together and intervened. Such a discussion can give them a basis for understanding the importance of each individual member of society in shaping a democratic society in an interdependent world.

It is important to remember that dialogue should not be aimed at persuading or pushing a certain point of view but at helping participants understand different points of view. Dialogue can help assess children’s critical thinking ability and see if they understand the true meaning of stories (Cowhey, 2006, p. 87). It can promote self-observation and the development of critical thinking in children regarding other people’s points of view.

References

Waddell, M. (2020). Farmer Duck. Candlewick Press.

Cowhey, M. (2006). Black ants and Buddhists: Thinking critically and teaching differently in the primary grades. Stenhouse Publishers.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2024, January 28). Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom. https://studycorgi.com/dialogue-in-the-elementary-classroom/

Work Cited

"Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom." StudyCorgi, 28 Jan. 2024, studycorgi.com/dialogue-in-the-elementary-classroom/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2024) 'Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom'. 28 January.

1. StudyCorgi. "Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom." January 28, 2024. https://studycorgi.com/dialogue-in-the-elementary-classroom/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom." January 28, 2024. https://studycorgi.com/dialogue-in-the-elementary-classroom/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2024. "Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom." January 28, 2024. https://studycorgi.com/dialogue-in-the-elementary-classroom/.

This paper, “Dialogue in the Elementary Classroom”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.