The mistreatment that employees’ representatives exposed to laborers had existed for a long time. The workforce used to battle to guarantee themselves freedom from unhealthy working conditions and ensure that they profit on their job. Recently, benefits and compensation in the working environment have become an inherent and essential part of every organization’s culture. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss all the questions related to employees’ compensation. The provided research will comment on Maersk’s compensation philosophy, the market’s influence on this philosophy, the interconnection between the value of salary surveys and the organization, and, finally, the advantages of discretionary benefits to Maersk.
Each company has its specific values and vision, which determines the organization’s compensation philosophy, and the definitions of compensation may vary. In Maersk’s industry, compensation is viewed as a systematic approach that guarantees monetary value in reward for employees’ performed work. This philosophy took roots when Maria Pejter, a senior director of Maersk Group’s Human Resources department, and Bill Allen, a head of Human Resources (HR), applied a new talent management strategy (Groysberg & Abbott, 2013). The main idea is to define individuals who have performed outstandingly, investigate whether their performance is sustainable, and how they have achieved it and, consequently, to encourage them by bonus reward and, thereby, inspire other staff members to follow the leader’s example.
In the following case study, there were two key situations in which the market had a powerful impact on the Maersk industry. The first one was attracting and holding talent from all over the world and the development of Asian and African markets (Groysberg & Abbott, 2013). A corporate culture formation led to the second outcome, precisely, how the Maersk study adopted the employees’ compensation approach described in the previous paragraph. Later, in 2009, People Strategy Sessions (PSS) were incorporated into the worldwide compensation system for senior pioneers, and it was the second innovation that affected the company (Groysberg & Abbott, 2013). It consisted of tracking and evaluating the particular PSS rating of the person working as a top on what that individual could get as a yearly bonus. Thus, successful employees earned a payout of up to 50% of the maximum, while less effective individuals could gain only 25% of this maximum number.
Salary surveys are valuable to the organization and its heads because such observations help Maersk’s industry fix a budget according to compensation. Moreover, the reviews are significant for getting the pay structures’ feedback, including an average salary contending in the same field or nationally that participates (Sungu, 2019). Only competing and planning the budget helps Maersk’s HR retain the employees, for instance, by expanding pay and being at the going rate for a certain vacancy. In this way, The Maersk’s authorities should realize the going pay rate for positions inside the establishments.
In order to create a trustworthy atmosphere where individuals are oriented on the performance-driven culture, the advantages of discretionary benefits should be of paramount importance. It is another successful direction of ensuring people that the Maersk industry appreciates their leadership and endowment in the organization’s evolution. Releasing an opportunity to have a range of staff benefits (such as health insurance, sick, maternity and vacation leaves, pension plans) that are not mandated by law but provided by the organization, the authorities gain coworkers’ trust.
In conclusion, it is vital to mention that great advantages and the compensation program will consistently cause the workers to feel company ownership. They will aspire to succeed; correspondingly, the organization targets and objectives will be constantly met. It has been proven that the higher the job’s gratification, the better the morale in the workplace. Thus, the production rate in the firm is increasing sales turnover.
References
Groysberg, B., & Abbott, S. L. (2013). AP Møller-Maersk group: Evaluating strategic talent management initiatives. Harvard Business Publishing.
Sungu, L. J., Weng, Q., & Xu, X. (2019). Organizational commitment and job performance: Examining the moderating roles of occupational commitment and transformational leadership. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 280-290.