Introduction
Various approaches to the formation of hegemony and the design of social institutions can be based on social change. Gramsci’s approach to the concept being studied is one of intellectual and moral leadership that should justify the formation of a competent attitude (Saputra et al., 2022). Thus, analytics of such aspects as common sense and good sense regarding certain concepts can contribute to improving public policy.
Main body
Socio-political concepts are complex structures with many elements that make it possible to resolve specific disputes comprehensively. Gramsci understood the concept of hegemony in such a way that it transcends political struggle and class divisions and thus contributes to the formation of perceptions of certain aspects in a unified way for society (Saputra et al., 2022). The current perception of terrorism can occur in society under the influence of many factors, such as the media or independent opinions that present information from a certain point of view. In this regard, people form the perception of terrorism as irrational and adverse actions, which reflects common sense.
The transformation of this situation into good sense can occur through careful consideration and, in some cases, distortion of facts that previously seemed unambiguous. Deeper disclosure of background and active advocacy can be valuable tools that can work to create good sense (Saputra et al., 2022). With the help of these mechanisms, it will be possible to achieve a different perception by people of terrorism as a more multifaceted and complex phenomenon that has different root causes.
The idea of hegemony proposed by Gramsci clarifies the complex relationship between “good sense” and “common sense.” The values and ideas that are prevalent in society and are frequently taken for granted by dominant ideologies are embodied in common sense. This worldview, which is seldom challenged, is developed and upheld by organizations that support the interests of the ruling class (Mouffe, 2014). On the other hand, good sense is a more critical and knowledgeable viewpoint that entails the capacity to probe, evaluate, and appreciate the intricacies of social and political matters. It uncovers underlying power structures and ideologies at work and goes beyond what is possible to understand with the naked eye.
A common misconception about terrorism is that it’s a binary problem with one adversary, violence, and fanaticism. This misconception is fueled by government narratives, media, and caricatures that spread fear and separation. Regarding terrorism, moving from this “common sense” to “good sense” necessitates study, critical thinking, and education to comprehend its intricate foundations (Lauderdale & Estep, 2011). Media literacy education programs are essential for equipping people with the skills necessary to assess news critically and understand how the media shapes public opinion.
It is imperative to broaden the narratives around terrorism by including a range of voices and viewpoints that contest the prevailing narrative. It is essential to challenge presumptions, preconceptions, and biases since critical thinking is necessary to unravel the complexity of the problem (Oliverio et al., 1998). Fostering a more thorough and compassionate knowledge of the origins and effects of terrorism requires an open and constructive discourse that welcomes a range of viewpoints. Lauderdale emphasizes how stories and narratives are presented in a particular way to appeal to particular audiences.
Moreover, given that a tale only depicts a portion of what people and a society experience, he argues, “The construction of a story is crucial to the production of hegemony and “reality “because it represents only selected features of what individuals and a society experience” (Lauderdale, 1998, p. 150). As a result, while discussing terrorism, the media and political debate frequently create narratives that highlight some parts of the problem while downplaying others. Hence, to turn “common sense” into “good sense,” it is critical to understand the narratives behind these stories and work toward constructing a more comprehensive and knowledgeable account that more accurately captures the complexity of terrorism.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the transformation of public perception of any aspect from one state to another is possible with the proper selection of tools. With their help, the state can influence citizens in order to invest in particular information that will contribute to the formation of common or good sense. In relation to terrorism, this is also a relevant aspect as it can lead to a change in attitude through a more complex perception.
References
Lauderdale, P., & Estep, R. E. (2011). The Bicentennial Protest: An Examination of Hegemony in the Definition of Deviant Political Activity. In A political analysis of deviance (pp. 73–91). De Sitter Publications.
Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci. In Gramsci and Marxist theory (RLE: Gramsci) (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis.
Oliverio, A., Frank, A. G., & Lauderdale, P. (1998). Afterword. In The State of Terror (pp. 147–155). State University of New York Press.
Saputra, K. A. K., Jayawarsa, A. K., & Priliandani, N. I. (2022). Antonio Gramsci hegemonical theory critical study: Accounting Fraud of Hindu-Bali. International Journal of Business, 27(2), 1-11. Web.