To create a fair pretrial bail system, it is important to look at the previous experience and try to add changes to the areas that suffered the most. For instance, when it comes to a petty crime that does not entail death or large financial losses, randomly selected people in the court might vote. If most people agree to allow the criminal to receive pretrial bail, the judge should agree with the majority. Approximately the same research was proposed by Oakes and Fleming (2018), where Ayanna Pressley proposes the legalization of activists. Nevertheless, if the crime causes serious damage to any area like human life or mass robbery, people who are not related to the law industry must be restricted from voting. These two new inventions should make the system more correct and fairer for those who might be sentenced, and specialists related to the specific case.
Governmental authorities can introduce a better regulations for those who are allowed pretrial bail. In this case, to support the rules under criminals, the penalty price should increase, and people should understand where this money goes. The funding may help police and lawyers control individuals for a longer time to prevent additional legal issues. Moreover, risk management should be improved, and additional studies have to introduce to educate the young generation to avoid unpredictable consequences when allowing people to follow the pretrial bail system. By using specific case studies from real life, students might become able to understand the psychology of criminals and predict possible behavior that might occur in the future. These four steps can be considered basic strategies to create a more trustful system of pretrial bail.
Reference
Oakes, B., and Fleming, W. (2018). Pressley says voters have a choice: Status Quo or changing Washington. Wbur.