The Most Rewarding Part in Conducting In-Depth Social History Investigation
Social history investigation is a complex notion of human understanding. While conducting this procedure, there are several challenges and rewards endured by the perpetrator. Creating a conducive and encouraging atmosphere for the interviewee is the most rewarding aspect of conducting social history investigation. In doing so, the interviewee feels safe and respected, which is vital for high-quality in-depth interactions. The research skills play an essential role in achieving the set objective. For instance, one can apply reflective listening as a tool of careful listening and showing empathy to the interviewer. Consequently, this helps in improving the interview quality and ensures that the discussions are ethically sound. According to Solomon (2014), Peter Lanza was free to engage with the interviewer, ask and answer questions. Further, Peter lived in a state of incomprehension of what Adam Lanza had done and what society thinks of him. Through the interview, he was able to give his whole story and the truth of the happenings.
The Most Difficult Part in Conducting In-Depth Social History Investigation
Most interviewers adhere to the golden rule of no harm, responsibility, and reflection. Essentially, such a procedure is considered the most challenging part of the in-depth social history investigations. In order to make ethical conclusions and decisions regarding the story or the discussion, one must anticipate the possible ethical concerns during the interview. According to Solomon (2014), he reflected on the ongoing news about Adam Lanza and the story given by this father. The interviewer had to analyze further whether autism caused the Sandy Hook massacre that claimed the lives of 26 people, or Adam Lanza was a criminal, as stated in the news. Therefore, it is to justify the ethical and the standard procedures in such a scenario.
Reference
Solomon, A. (2014). The reckoning. The New Yorker. New York 90(4).