Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law

The case of Mr. Kass is an example of a court proceeding where the judges had to consider several facts in reliance on the principles of the law. Mr. Kass quit his job with Bechtel Power and moved from Michigan to New Jersey since he was to be employed by Brown Boveri Corporation. Mr. Brown Boveri and Mr. Kass had entered into an agreement that saw Mr. Kass employed in managerial control and automation. The new job was in the form of a contract to run for two years.

Mr. Kass’s employment with Brown Boveri ended when Mr. Kass wrote a resignation letter due to a violation of the contract they had agreed on at first. Kass had found out that another managerial staff in brow Boveri’s organization had an executive role in a project that conflicted with the agreement in his contract with Boveri. Then, a gentleman’s agreement prevented Mr. Kass from exercising executive power over the other managerial staff, Bruce Reinman, or the project he was in charge of. After six months, Brown Boveri tried to demote Mr. Kass to a sales engineer position which was a lesser position, leading to Mr. Kass’ resignation.

These facts are similar to those in the case of Wharton v. Christie (1891) since, in both cases, Kass and Christie’s submitted their resignation letters after their employers had wrongly discharged them. Both employers had violated the agreement they had with their employees during the time of employment. Thus, these two cases took place in similar circumstances and involved identical areas of law but occurred in different periods.

This decision suggests that judges decide cases based on the facts and basic law principles. Under the legal realist approach, judges decide cases based on their interpretation of the law and the facts. In this regard, in Mr. Kass’s case, the judges used legal precedents considering specific facts and the time perspective of the precedent and Mr. Kass’s point. Thus, this case demonstrates that judges make decisions based primarily on the law but may depart from the precedents if it is necessary to comply with the principles of justice.

Work Cited

Frank, Jerome. “Realism and the Law”. American University. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, December 1). Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law. https://studycorgi.com/judges-decisions-realism-and-the-law/

Work Cited

"Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law." StudyCorgi, 1 Dec. 2023, studycorgi.com/judges-decisions-realism-and-the-law/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law'. 1 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law." December 1, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/judges-decisions-realism-and-the-law/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law." December 1, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/judges-decisions-realism-and-the-law/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law." December 1, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/judges-decisions-realism-and-the-law/.

This paper, “Judges Decisions: Realism and the Law”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.