Tumialan, Zagajeski, Galati, and Sherman (2012) assessed the lateral load-resisting system of the structure from a stadium constructed in 1930. Their research develops an argument on the improvement of these systems in comparison to the preceding ones. It shows how structural engineer of the present world are striving to deliver concrete constructions that are more reliable and long-lasting than the previous ones. The researchers point out that the present engineers are making the earlier architectural and structural innovations better using the current literatures and discoveries. Their study is directed towards answering whether the current renovations on the earlier stadiums had subsequent effects on the lateral load-resisting system.
This attention on the deterioration of the lateral strength and flexibility had been criticized after the 1990 renovation. This invoked the researchers to develop an in situ study revealing whether these renovations would impair the performance on the strength and resistance of the load in the stadium. In a bid to address this issue, 2 setups were developed in situ where masonry was reduced by 25% from the initial structure. This methodology sought to understand the repeatability, permanency, and deviation from linearity between the prevailing and original structures. The results depicted that there were no evident impairment of the load resistance prior to the renovations. The in situ test dictated the presence of sway flexibility, which did not show effects of masonry distress after ten years of use.
Essentially, the article has applied reliable and definite research techniques involving tests and primary data. The problem is raised from a background of the issues developed since the renovation of the 1930s construction. All aspects of proper empirical research are considered. Apparently, the discussion applies most of the results to make the conclusions of the study. However, it is apparent that the research did not draw information from previous literature to support the discussions. In fact, the article does not have any clear literature review on the construction of stadiums. This aspect implies that it can be tough to verify the viability of the claims made in the discussion. Furthermore, it is not clear about which specified stadium is being evaluated by the researchers. This research cannot be used for generalization since it is developed to answer specific problems facing the stadium under study. However, it can be applied when evaluating the lateral strength of other stadiums across the globe. It can also develop new and reliable idea involving the development of other researches.
Art of convenient and reliable stadiums for holding national and international sporting event is imperative to my topic of interest. Designing reliable resources for mass events that cannot collapse does not only attract fans, but also prevent risks associated to risk. Therefore, learning and monitoring how these masses affect the stadium strength is essential to designer of sports. Furthermore, quality structures that can be used for a long period without demanding frequent maintenance funds may reduce the arrest of sporting activities attributed to lack of funds. Finally, research and development involving these structures are the roles of sports’ specialists who can pay attention and determine the possible effects associated to cheering and mass events. Such structural issues can be identified through the assistance of researchers in the area of sports.
Reference
Tumialan, G., Zagajeski, S. W., Galati, N., & Sherman, M. R. (2012). Evaluation of the Lateral Load-Resisting System of a Stadium Structure. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 43(9), 364-370.