The article Lawsuit Charges For-Profit University Preyed on Black and Female Students was written by Erica L. Green and published in the New York Times on April 8, 2022. It covers stories of several women who enrolled at Walden University and became victims of its reverse redlining policy. A class-action lawsuit was filed by a group of former and current Walden students who claimed that the university lured them by promising them an affordable degree. It then intentionally lengthened the process of completing a capstone project for many students, imposing new requirements for them to reenroll (Green, 2022). Those students were significantly overcharged, which is argued to be a part of the university’s strategy to increase profits. The suit also claims that this practice mostly targeted Black women, while the university explained this tendency as a focus on diversity.
I have chosen this article for the review because I was stunned to read about the wrongdoings committed by the university management. In preparation for the review, I critically assessed the information presented in the article and came to the conclusion that it is credible and corroborated by a sufficient number of sources. I think overcharging students to increase profits is an extremely unethical practice, especially when conducted on such a large scale. This unfair and immoral tendency is further compounded by its main targets being Black female students. I can suggest that the university management viewed this population as a minority group that is more vulnerable and likely to pay additional charges in tuition (Green, 2022). Green presents a comprehensive perspective on these wrongdoings, exposing multiple examples of such violations. I agree with the article’s main point and believe there are unlikely any justifiable explanations for these methods.
Reference
Green, E. L. (2022). Lawsuit charges for-profit university preyed on Black and female students. The New York Times.