Introduction
The assertion that sex work is the oldest job globally is a widely held belief, although it is also widely recognized as the most dangerous. Sex workers face a significant lack of protection due to the prevailing shame and taboos associated with their profession. Hence, it is justifiable to inquire into the enduring presence of this occupation throughout history, despite humanity’s persistent failure to devise effective measures to safeguard its workforce.
Decriminalization has consistently been proposed as the optimal resolution; however, individuals disagree. Undoubtedly, sex workers in the United States and elsewhere are subjected to exploitation and criminal activities. The rules in America regarding sex work are still extremely inadequate, as the majority of states have made it illegal. Legalization, a process in which the government exercises control over a profession and permits it only under specific circumstances, can enhance workers’ safety and well-being.
The debate on legalizing or decriminalizing sex employment often revolves around prostitution, a broad industry that includes pornography. However, most US legislation prohibiting sex work focuses on prostitution, with arguments that it is exploitative, especially for women from racial and ethnic minority groups (Glazer). While sex work is widely recognized as exploitative, several critics contend that its level of exploitation is comparable to that of other industries (Grieb et al., 381).
Occasionally, there is a contention that individuals have no desire to engage in prostitution, and this viewpoint can be manipulated to imply that a substantial proportion of sex workers are compelled into this profession or subjected to coercion or trafficking. According to Grieb et al., the proportion of sex workers in the United States who are immigrants or victims of trafficking is minimal (379). Sex work, akin to other industries, operates under the framework of capitalism, hence rendering it inherently exploitative.
Entry into Sex Work is Voluntary but Lacks Protection
Every industry depends on exploiting workers by either underpaying them for their labor or taking advantage of individuals’ need to work to earn money for their survival, regardless of the methods employed. Therefore, eliminating the sex industry based on exploitation times seems irrational. The prevailing reality is that a significant proportion of women engaging in sex work do so voluntarily, a phenomenon that is not as exploitative as any other sector.
Similar to drugs, the duty is to mitigate the harm inflicted upon sex workers in the profession. The primary concern that requires attention is the principal menace inflicted upon women, who are the most susceptible in the sector. Fernandez argues that the most effective approach to improve the safety of street-based sex workers and decrease their susceptibility to serial killing is to decriminalize all facets of sex work (218). Undoubtedly, the decriminalization of sex work has sparked intense controversy, although it holds the potential to enhance safety within the business.
There has been a notable rise in the incidence of violence against women within the sex work sector over time. As an illustration, Fernandez highlights that a significant fraction of those whom serial murderers have targeted are employed in the sex industry (210). During the past three decades, numerous serial killers have specifically focused on commercial sex workers, managing to evade capture for extended periods(Fernandez, 210). Additionally, sex workers are disproportionately affected by gender-based violence (GBV), which has severe physical and emotional impacts on their well-being, including increasing their risk of mortality.
Subjection to societal and legal biases, inadequate investigations by authorities, and unfair profiling often drains them emotionally and limits access to legal protection. Research shows that these women are at a higher risk of being victims of such violence due to the profiling and lack of support from society and authorities (Panchanadeswaran et al., 3). Prostitution, with a mortality rate of 204 per 100,000 individuals, is arguably the most perilous occupation in the United States (Galarza). The main factor contributing to the association of violence with sex work, similar to its association with narcotics, is its illegality.
Models of Sex Work Legalization and Their Impacts
In jurisdictions where sex work is prohibited, engaging in employment with or for a prostitute, such as for security purposes, exposes an individual to potential criminal prosecution. Additionally, it poses a challenge for women in locating suitable collaborators. For instance, the UK legalizes prostitution, but for individuals operating alone, which compels women into dangerous situations without security (Matolcsi et al., 13). The ban on prostitution can also provide men with a feeling of safety in mistreating and physically attacking women, as they are unable to seek assistance from law enforcement (Walker).
Many women are often afraid of reporting assaults to authorities due to the illegal nature of their profession (Struyf, 3065). According to Kiener, the decriminalization of sex work would make it easier for victims of human trafficking to disclose incidents and enable law enforcement to focus on identifying traffickers and rapists rather than customers and sex workers (53). Aside from the evident risk of imprisonment, numerous sex workers also encounter additional instances of assault or mistreatment from authorities.
Neo-Abolitionism Model
Neo-abolitionism, often known as Nordic, is a versatile hybrid style of legalization. Kotiswaran states the model is present in France, Canada, Sweden, and Ireland. Prostitution is deemed lawful in this paradigm, whereas the act of employing a prostitute is deemed unlawful (47).
While it may appear appealing and supportive of feminist principles, it fails to contribute to the safety of sex workers. Prostitutes, for example, must still locate clients and ensure their safety from law enforcement, implying they practice in secrecy away from secure designated areas. Furthermore, sex workers must acknowledge the reality that clients may withhold their actual identities and contact information, rendering them untraceable in case of an incident.
Moreover, targeting clients with legal implications implies that the sex workers must minimize negotiation or time to evaluate their clients’ intentions, whether they are dangerous or simply anxious. Therefore, the concept of neo-abolitionism aimed to undermine the demand and diminish the market for sex work, thus leading to a decline in the representation of women in this occupation. There is insufficient data to support its success, given that the conditions that frequently compel women to engage in sex work, such as the absence of other prospects, persist.
Legalization with Regulation
One potential approach is to fully legalize and regulate the issue, as in Germany, South America, Turkey, and Taiwan. The legalization approach entails implementing regulations rather than decriminalization, eliminating criminal consequences for all parties involved without imposing any further regulations. Human Rights Watch presents compelling arguments advocating for the complete decriminalization of consensual adult sex work but acknowledging the potential for disorder in the absence of prostitution-specific rules. According to Human Rights Watch, the group asserts that the criminalization of sex workers results in their vulnerability to harassment and exploitation by both law enforcement officials and clients. In this perspective, regulation does not pertain to workplace safety legislation.
With the implementation of the regulatory system, sex workers would be subject to the same laws that protect them from human trafficking and forced labor, as well as the minimum wage and the ability to organize. Regulations exhibit significant variation, with notable instances observed encompassing license prerequisites, limitations on advertising, banned zones, and restrictions on drug-using prostitutes (Welch58). Typically, rules safeguard the general public’s welfare and other entities with no vested interest in the industry. However, the majority of rules regarding prostitution worldwide are only expansions of puritanical moral perspectives that resulted in its criminalization.
Decriminalization or Partial Decriminalization
Implementing complete decriminalization would result in increased exploitation. There is a lack of willing participants to satisfy the existing market demand, potentially resulting in an influx of unsuspecting sex workers into the market. Partial decriminalization, which resembles the Nordic model, has been put out by several critics of decriminalization (Anderson 1).
Partial decriminalization allows for the sale of sexual services without classifying sex workers as criminals. Nevertheless, buyers and pimps can be apprehended, compelling law enforcement to pursue individuals who contribute to the surge in commercial sex or exploit the susceptibility of sex workers. The expectations for partial decriminalization are somewhat peculiar, as it is considered a criminal offense to engage in sex work, yet it is a crime to pay for sex.
Decriminalization entails the elimination of criminalization for sex work, so providing workers the liberty to engage in their profession without facing legal consequences. Consequently, individuals engaged in sex work and their clientele will not face legal repercussions. Legalization refers to the government regulating a profession, allowing it to operate only under particular circumstances. One illustrative example concerns the legalization of cannabis in Canada, where the government exercises extensive regulatory oversight.
Nevertheless, this approach may not apply to prostitution as it grants the government the authority to determine the timing, location, and manner in which prostitution can be carried out. Advocates of decriminalization argue that eliminating the legislation that criminalizes the purchase and implementing new laws that acknowledge the presence of sex work and provide essential socio-legal support to workers is the optimal approach (Human Rights Watch). It will alleviate the restrictions on customers and sex workers, facilitate the promotion of services by sex workers, and enable third parties to promote on behalf of sex workers. Moreover, it will empower them to evaluate clients and negotiate for more favorable terms.
Advantages of Decriminalization
Appropriate legislation on decriminalization would provide sex workers with opportunities to access legal, healthcare, and insurance services. Additionally, it has the potential to mitigate the general spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), diminish instances of physical and sexual assault, and mitigate criminal activities such as child exploitation and human trafficking. Advocates of decriminalization have referenced New Zealand as a compelling example.
According to a survey conducted by Fernandez, nearly 90% of sex workers in New Zealand held the belief that the Prostitution Reform Act (PRA) enhanced their opportunities for employment, legal protection, and access to health and safety rights (220). According to Matolcsi et al., many individuals reported that it was more convenient to decline clients and that the police’s attitude towards them had changed (44). Nevertheless, decriminalization presupposes that every woman in the industry is engaged in it voluntarily, a notion that can be deceptive.
Best Way to Make Sex Work Legal in the U.S.
The relationship between prostitution and trafficking is inherently intertwined, with certain women being deceived into engaging in the commercial sex business. The current representation of women in the sector surpasses that of any previous period, mostly driven by increased demand (Anderson, 8). In situations where the number of individuals willing to engage in sexual transactions is insufficient, the supply will be generated by any available methods. The complete decriminalization has the potential to escalate kidnapping, drugging, manipulation, compulsion, and deceit, including generating excessive demand or supply.
Since women opt to engage in sex labor for a multitude of reasons, such as poverty, lack of shelter, gender inequality, and sexual bias, dealers in the industry can easily exploit their vulnerability in an unregulated market. The absence of industry regulation may lead to an unparalleled surge in demand and supply, potentially resulting in the emergence of third-party entities, pimping, or trafficking. Therefore, sex work should be made legal in America under control by appropriate regulations appropriate to the industry.
Despite the intended purpose of safeguarding sex workers, the Nordic legislation has inadvertently exacerbated the challenges they face in their occupation. According to sex workers, the act of punishing their clients can be seen as a form of punishment towards them. Several sex workers and campaigners have publicly said that they are now compelled to make more precarious concessions to safeguard their clients from apprehension (Anderson, 15). Consequently, they may need to visit clients’ residences rather than their workplaces, which carries a higher risk. Given the stringent nature of legalization and the potential hazards of partial decriminalization, decriminalization appears to be the sole straightforward solution.
Currently, most states in the U.S. have enacted legislation to criminalize prostitution, thereby prohibiting individuals from engaging in the sale or purchase of sex, as well as from profiting from or facilitating prostitution. Critics of sex work decriminalization argue that the activities of pimping and peddling sex should continue to be prohibited by law. Prostitution unequivocally transgresses the fundamental principles of morality that society relies on to cultivate socially conscientious generations (Kotiswaran, 58).
The author argues that consumer and trafficker apprehensions lead to a significant decrease in demand. Nevertheless, rather than incarcerating prostitutes, it is imperative to offer them a means to attain liberation and rehabilitation. Studies indicate that a significant number of women desire to leave, even though they perceive no alternative means of ensuring their survival (Matolcsi et al., 40). They require alternatives and prospects to endure without resorting to the sale of their bodies rather than relying on handcuffs and prison cells.
Prostitution is often misunderstood as a sexual activity between consenting adults without restrictions. However, efforts are underway to make it more acceptable and legal by removing its criminal status. The goal is to eliminate sanctions for all parties involved, including purchasing, vending, exploitation, and solicitation. Many individuals engage in prostitution for shelter and sustenance (Schwie).
The goal is not to pass judgment but to oversee a comprehensive transformation where prostitution is not the sole means of existence for individuals. The persistent nature of sex work necessitates prompt and effective measures to address this issue. Legalizing prostitution with some limitations is an immediate solution, while the government and social organizations work together to help individuals recover, explore alternative options, and lead a reasonable lifestyle.
It is possible to say that many people advocating for decriminalization or criminalization of sex work do not represent the feelings of those seeking to break free from prostitution. Within the realm of sex work, acts that would typically be subject to legal consequences, such as sexual harassment, are regarded as obligatory aspects of employment.
Sex workers employed in strip clubs, which are considered legal but unregulated sectors of the sex business, experience a higher incidence of sexual assault. The legality of stripping does not protect sex workers from abuse and violence, nor does it ensure punishment for those responsible. Hence, the implementation of legalization, accompanied by appropriate regulations, represents a viable approach to restoring stability to the sex work sector while concurrently addressing enduring challenges to provide individuals involved with improved alternatives.
Conclusion
Legalizing sex work with proper regulations, rather than decriminalizing it, can address issues of violence, victimization, and other hazards in the industry. Unrestricted legalization can lead to a higher influx of individuals, a decline in moral standards, and increased demand, which can attract pimps and traffickers. Alternatives like neo-abolitionism and complete legalization can create a covert environment, exposing individuals to increased risk and harassment. Many prostitution workers lack the agency to make informed decisions about their career paths due to limited job opportunities. Legalizing sex work with appropriate regulations would provide an immediate solution to violence, prejudice, and mistreatment while also enabling the implementation of a sustainable plan to protect sex workers.
Works Cited
Anderson, Linda. “Let’s Talk about Sex (Work): The Irony of Partial Decriminalization of Sex Work.” Journal of Law and Social Change, vol. 26, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–32.
Fernandez, Lauren. ” Defending the Less Dead: Using the Decriminalization of Sex Work to Combat the High Incidence of Serial Homicide of Street-Based Sex Workers”William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender & Social Justice, vol. 29, no. 6, 2022, pp. 205–28.
Galarza, Marisa Jordan. “Legalizing Prostitution Could Benefit Our Communities.” The Pioneer Optimist, 2022.
Glazer, Sarah. “Should Buying and Selling Sex Be Legal.” CQ Press, vol. 26, no. 15, 2016.
Grieb, Suzanne, et al. “Sex Work within Emerging Latino Immigrant Communities: A Typology.” Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 24, no. 3, 2020, pp. 374–90.
Human Rights Watch. “Why Sex Work Should Be Decriminalized.” Human Rights Watch, 2019.
Kiener, Robert. Human Trafficking and Slavery. CQ Press, 2012.
Kotiswaran, Prabha. “The Sexual Politics of Anti-Trafficking Discourse.” Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, 2021, pp. 43–65.
Matolcsi, Andrea, et al. “The Current Landscape of Prostitution and Sex Work in England and Wales.” Sexuality & Culture, vol. 25, no. 5, 2020, pp. 39–57.
Panchanadeswaran, Subadra, et al. “Female Sex Workers’ Experiences of Violence and Aggression from Sexual Partners.” Handbook of Anger, Aggression, and Violence, edited by Martin, C., Preedy, V.R., Patel, V.B., 2023, pp. 1–19.
Shwie, Helen. “The Benefits of Legalizing Prostitution.”BORGEN, 2020.
Struyf, Pia. “To Report or Not to Report? A Systematic Review of Sex Workers’ Willingness to Report Violence and Victimization to Police.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, vol. 24, no. 5, 2022, pp. 3065–77.
Walker, Kaniya. “To Protect Black Trans Lives, Decriminalize Sex Work | News & Commentary.” American Civil Liberties Union, 2020.
Welch, Brittney M. “Public Health and Sex Work: Using History to Motivate Change.” Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 41, no. 1-2, 2021, pp. 95–108.