Introduction
Medicare and Medicaid are state-sponsored initiatives that assist American citizens with healthcare expenditures. These two schemes, founded in 1965 and paid for by the public, have common-sounding names, which can cause misunderstandings regarding their operation and the media attention they offer (Fabius et al., 2021). Medicare covers healthcare benefits for many 65-year-olds and disabled individuals, and its eligibility depends on income (Fabius et al., 2021). Medicaid is intended for low-income individuals and is frequently a plan of last resort for individuals without other reserves (Fabius et al., 2021). Consequently, all legal U.S. residents and inhabitants with earnings 138% below the poverty threshold are eligible for Medicaid coverage in Medicaid-participating jurisdictions (Lee et al., 2019). This presentation will describe the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) and how it enhances Medicare policy and treatment. Additionally, the article also discusses Medicare and Medicaid eligibility and how requirements might be amended to assist more individuals who are deemed vulnerable. Finally, the paper discusses the ACA’s impact on Medicare and Medicaid participants’ advantages and insurance.
How Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Enhances Medicare
A Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) is an organization of general practitioners and healthcare providers formed to ensure the efficiency of treatment provided to Medicare recipients. QIOs address concerns about the quality of service and consider applications for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Original when consumers disagree with a carrier’s judgment to discontinue service (Digmann et al., 2019). QIOs are tasked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to assist Medicare practitioners with performance effectiveness and review quality issues for safeguarding Medicare Trust Fund beneficiaries (Digmann et al., 2019). CMS has appointed two QIOs in each state, where one QIO resolves client complaints and case reviews, while another will help medical professionals and manufacturers with technical cooperation. When Medicare refuses reimbursement or ceases offerings from a medical institution, skilled nursing facility (SNF), or Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facility (CORF), Americans may submit an accelerated request to the QIO to continue their treatment (Digmann et al., 2019). Therefore, with such systems in place, QIO plays a significant role in improving guidelines and healthcare for Medicare beneficiaries.
As discussed in this section, the following are some of how QIO performs the roles mentioned above. Through the Beneficiary and family-centered care – Quality Improvement Organizations (BFCC-QIO), QIO enhances quality healthcare and safeguards Medicare recipients through speedy legislative assessment activities, such as dissatisfaction and patient outcomes evaluations (Goldschmidt, 2018). The BFCC-QIO handles all recipients’ grievances, level of care evaluations, and other categories of scenario audit to ensure uniformity in the specific instance performance testing. BFSS-QIO does the aspects mentioned while considering critical local aspects to claimants and their parents, such as the necessity for high-quality care, health demand, and readmissions. A patient or family member may register a concern about providing treatment in two ways. One may register a grievance with the BFCC-QIO, and second, the BFCC-QIO will undertake an insight into the effectiveness of care (Goldschmidt, 2018). Regardless of the governmental accreditation and certification procedure, the evaluation aims at enhancing the standard of care procedures for all beneficiaries.
Additionally, to improve policies and efficient health outcomes, QIO established Quality Improvement Network-Quality Improvement Organizations (QIN-QIO). QIN-QIO enhances quality healthcare through instruction, community engagement, sharing proven methodologies, utilizing the analysis to assess advancement, collaborating with patients and caregivers, and organizing society collaborators for coordination and teamwork (Goldschmidt, 2018). To satisfy Medicare beneficiaries’ goals, QIN-QIOs also seek to upgrade the effectiveness of healthcare for specific health problems and priority groups and minimize the incidence of health-acquired illnesses. QIN-QIO programs are situated in neighborhoods, healthcare institutions, and treatment plans (Goldschmidt, 2018). The group focuses on lowering healthcare-associated infections (HAI), readmission rates, medical mistakes, injuries, decubitus ulcers, leveraging medical innovation, reducing heart disease and diabetes, eliminating healthcare inequalities, and coordinating treatment (Goldschmidt, 2018). With the above bodies and the respective responsibilities they are tasked with, Medicare beneficiaries experience improved health outcomes.
Qualifications and Modifications for Medicare and Medicaid Benefits
Some of the factors considered for one to be eligible for Medicare and Medicaid are enumerated below. Medicare is typically provided to those 65 years of age or older, younger individuals with impairments, and those with End-Stage Renal Disease, irreversible kidney disease needing dialysis or surgery (Figueroa et al., 2018). Part A, hospital insurance, and Part B, Medicare health coverage, are the two components of Medicare. A person is qualified for Part A without payment if they are 65 or older and have labored and contributed towards Medicare premiums for at least ten years (Figueroa et al., 2018). Medicaid patients may be eligible for free or low-cost treatment depending on their earnings and household size. Medicaid offers health care to certain low-income individuals, spouses, youngsters, pregnant women, the aged, and the physically disabled in every state (Figueroa et al., 2018). However, the scheme provides cover for all people with modest incomes below a particular threshold in certain jurisdictions.
Some of the changes that can be made to Medicare and Medicaid programs to serve vulnerable groups such as the aged, low-income earners, and those with severe diseases and disabilities are highlighted below. Modifying reimbursements for health disparities or functional capacity is particularly important for Medicare and Medicaid insurers with a substantial registration of persons with chronic medical conditions (Johnson et al., 2018). As such, healthcare plans and suppliers have an opportunity to advance creative treatment approaches that serve these people most effectively. Risk-adjusted compensation is particularly essential to supporting the safety-net purpose of some providers, such as community hospitals, rural treatment centers, and university health centers, which offer a greater proportion of treatment to disadvantaged populations (Johnson et al., 2018). High-level convening partners should implement Medicare risk-adjusted premiums to decide the optimal implementation strategy.
Additionally, enhancing government and individual state funding for the two programs would increase the likelihood of vulnerable groups being covered. Thus, this can be done by jointly subsidizing the government and the counties towards Medicare and Medicaid, with no limit on federal government equivalent contributions to the states. The system’s matching framework enables regions with finances to easily adjust to societal and cultural developments, growing medical costs, and shifting state objectives (Johnson et al., 2018). This framework allows the Medicare and Medicaid programs to react to public health crises, environmental catastrophes, and other calamities. Therefore, more financing would play a leading role in ensuring that the two schemes cover vulnerable groups within the USA and in all states.
Impacts of Affordable Care Act on Medicare and Medicaid Recipients
Since its enactment, ACA has had positive and negative impacts on Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA), major healthcare legislation, in March 2010 by President Barack Obama (Zieff et al., 2020). The guideline, initially known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and often referred to as Obamacare, shows a collection of medical regulations designed to improve health coverage for most uninsured Americans (Zieff et al., 2020). From its onset, ACA increased the number of Medicare and Medicaid insurances. While all states achieved Medicare and Medicaid coverage improvements when the ACA’s primary structures and functions came into operation in 2014, expansion jurisdictions saw substantially bigger declines in the uncovered rates of low-income individuals. Medicaid expansion has been particularly important for providing coverage for persons with opioid dependence.
There was an urgent need for rehabilitation for opioid-use dysfunction and other drug-related behaviors. In 2016, 63,000 individuals succumbed to drug overdoses, with 42,200 deaths attributable to opioid usage (Zieff et al., 2020). In expansion counties, the percentage of opioid-related admissions in which the client was uncovered decreased by 79%, compared to only 5% in non-expansion regions, since the implementation of Medicaid development (Zieff et al., 2020). Long established racial differences in Medicaid insurance and quality of care, caused by factors such as prejudice, socioeconomic and health scheme disparities, and immigrants’ constrained qualifications for public healthcare coverage, are still important but have diminished since 2014, when the ACA’s major coverage clauses went into effect (Zieff et al., 2020). With its affordability, ACA has helped improve medical coverage, thus, reducing health disparities.
Furthermore, the Affordable Care Act covers Medicare preventative and prescription medication coverage deficiencies. It launches comprehensive testing of novel financial mechanisms to maximize the quality of care provided to recipients and, indirectly, all Americans (Zieff et al., 2020). It significantly broadens the Medicare Health Insurance Trust Fund’s stability by lowering the increase of prospective Medicare expenditures. Some ACA changes can transform the Medicare scheme by shifting Medicare off from fee-for-service reimbursement and making medical workers responsible for the performance and overall cost of treatment (Zieff et al., 2020). The law’s establishment of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), for instance, has permitted Medicare to verify advanced methods of vendor compensation and customer (Zieff et al., 2020). The CMMI-initiated initiatives are only starting to yield results; more effort remains to discover and disseminate effective payment solutions.
However, opponents of the ACA said that it marked an exceptional extension of government authority in the medical business since it mandated the procurement of a service, health coverage, by all people, regardless of their preferences. The National Federation of Independent Business contested this element of the statute in 2012 before the U.S. Supreme Court, where it was a prominent topic of discussion (Oberlander, 2020). In addition, monthly insurance premiums have increased dramatically in recent years, particularly for healthcare plans marketed under the ACA’s health insurance exchanges. In 2016, it was anticipated that Gold, Silver, and Bronze health insurance on the marketplaces would increase by double digits (Oberlander, 2020). The rising cost of Medicare and Medicaid insurance payments is since 20 million more individuals had health insurance coverage, the pre-existing condition provision is no longer in effect, and payers must cover the expenses of sicker patients (Oberlander, 2020). Health plans must also cover the full cost of preventative care, which has forced payers to raise their premiums to meet the additional expenses.
Roles in Advocating for Cost-Effective Care for Vulnerable Populations
Without sacrificing healthcare outcomes, healthcare professionals are rapidly incorporating cost-effective care practices. To offer cost-effective treatment, health care providers must make informed judgments on resource allocation. As explained, the duties of healthcare professionals in the profession of lobbying for cost-effective treatment for disadvantaged groups are as follows. Physicians should provide vulnerable patients with cost-effective healthcare advice in the following areas. Advising persons from disadvantaged groups to save money for drugs allows them to cover unanticipated medical needs. Some of the suggestions that medical practitioners can give vulnerable clients are inquiries about outpatient treatment, prioritizing health maintenance overtreatment, and choosing an affordable health plan. In addition, medical workers should ensure that marginalized patients get efficient and prompt insurance coverage. Furthermore, as a primary care provider, one may begin by reducing their material waste and educating their employees to do the same. A cost-effectiveness threshold is often established such that the solution looks to be somewhat cost-effective. For instance, advising people with lung or heart disease to avoid smoking and eating junk food will save them money by reducing further health complications.
Conclusion
Medicare and Medicaid are state-sponsored programs that help Americans with their healthcare costs. QIO is an organization of general practitioners and healthcare professionals founded to guarantee Medicare users’ treatment efficacy. QIO improves healthcare quality and protects Medicare users by swift legislative assessment actions, such as patient satisfaction and outcomes assessments. Modifying compensation based on health inequalities or functional capacity is crucial for Medicare and Medicaid payers with many enrolled patients with chronic medical issues. Since its inception, the Affordable Care Act has had both beneficial and bad effects on Medicare and Medicaid recipients. The Affordable Care Act addresses Medicare’s coverage gaps for preventive and prescription medications. Nonetheless, monthly insurance costs have skyrocketed, especially for medical plans sold under the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges. To deliver cost-effective care, health care professionals must make knowledgeable resource allocation decisions. Advising impoverished individuals to save for medications enables them to meet unplanned medical expenses.
References
Digmann, R., Thomas, A., Peppercorn, S., Ryan, A., Zhang, L., Irby, K., & Brock, J. (2019). Use of Medicare administrative claims to identify a population at high risk for adverse drug events and hospital use for quality improvement. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 25(3), 402-410.
Fabius, C. D., Cornell, P. Y., Zhang, W., & Thomas, K. S. (2021). State Medicaid financing and access to large assisted living settings for Medicare–Medicaid dual-eligibles. Medical Care Research and Review, 79(1), 1-9.
Figueroa, J. F., Lyon, Z., Zhou, X., Grabowski, D. C., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Persistence and drivers of high-cost status among dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries: an observational study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(8), 528-534.
Fullen, M. C., Lawson, G., & Sharma, J. (2020). Analyzing the impact of the Medicare coverage gap on counseling professionals: Results of a national study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 98(2), 207-219.
Goldschmidt, P. G. (2018). The right to appeal discharge decisions and to receive important message from Medicare: Hospitals should ensure compliance. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 20(3), 47-55.
Johnson, T. J., Jones, A., Lulias, C., & Perry, A. (2018). Practice innovation, health care utilization and costs in a network of federally qualified health centers and hospitals for Medicaid enrollees. Population Health Management, 21(3), 196-201.
Lee, Y., Mozaffarian, D., Sy, S., Huang, Y., Liu, J., Wilde, P. E., Abrahams-Gessel, S., Veiga Jardim, T. S., Gaziano, T. A. & Micha, R. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives for improving diet and health through Medicare and Medicaid: A microsimulation study. PLoS Medicine, 16(3), 1-56.
Oberlander, J. (2020). The ten years’ war: Politics, partisanship, and the ACA: An exploration of why the Affordable Care Act has been so divisive despite the law’s considerable accomplishments. Health Affairs, 39(3), 471-478.
Zieff, G., Kerr, Z. Y., Moore, J. B., & Stoner, L. (2020). Universal healthcare in the United States of America: A healthy debate. Medicina, 56(11), 1-7.