Meditech is an electronic health record structure that offers clinical recording for health care specialists at midsized and public hospitals. This EHR has continuously been praised for its reliability and user-friendliness (Cruz et al., 2014). The clinical boards feature permits doctors and other medical workers to follow current patient actions and collect those particular fragments of information into a single screen (Ford, Huang, Richards, Ambinder, & Rosenberger, 2016). This screen can also be personalized to comply with the doctor’s field of practice, such as nutritional or respirational therapy so that only pertinent data is primarily given away.
This EHR is fully compatible with current healthcare information standards. Meditech supports all the team members including registration management staff, schedulers, and coders. Meditech EHR is also certified according to Stage 2 of the Meaningful Use and proposes features that support administrators. Hospital workers can view patient vital statistics, laboratory results, suppository info, wellbeing history, patient records and analytic imaging from this protected system. Also, Meditech is compliant with the HIPAA (Gellert et al., 2015).
Moreover, the EHR offers strong security and confidentiality functionality, together with the standard TLS encryption, multiple forms of EDI transactions and maintained encryption sets and sustenance for extended ARRA safety necessities and breach warning standards. Meditech helps the institution to meet ICD-10 trials, with computerized working process procedures, yielding updates, and greater worker documents experience. By plotting analytical terminologies to medicinal notions, the medical specialists can use the same evocative language they would use in a regular conversation, and let the electronic health records system save the code for them.
There are numerous security features in Meditech EHR. For instance, authentication is guaranteed through the well-organized use of passwords designed to establish proper user identification. Access to the exclusive working process and supply system is approved only after the verification. Information, application, and system integrity are the key factors responsible for certifying that information is edited only in a definite and previously sanctioned manner.
To ensure the ongoing security of the data, the organization will have to protect the physical storing of all data and its broadcast (Krauss et al., 2016). This takes in relentless surveillance by system specialists, property watched by security staff, backup generators, and strongly encoded transmission of the information.
Patient confidentiality is an important issue, which is why it would be reasonable to restrict access to all private information. Only the chosen employees should have access to the application for administrative and provisional purposes (Marien, Krug, & Spinewine, 2016). These workers should be limited in number and loyal to Meditech confidentiality and safety policies. Another important feature is the logging of all changes made to each file, including the managing editor, editor’s role, and timestamp of the edit. This type of monitoring of events taking place in the system is designed to avert and spot any security breach. Authorization is ensured through the grant of access based on client-defined, role-based access rights.
The nurse administrator may access the data from the EHR to check up with the prescriptions and important notes from other doctors providing care for the patients. This would help organize the best quality health care and exclude the possibility of doing damage to the patient by prescribing the medicine twice. Another asset is the act of minimizing the amount of hand-written prescriptions that sometimes cause confusion and represent the danger to the patient.
References
Gellert, G. A., Hill, V., Bruner, K., Maciaz, G., Saucedo, L., Catzoela, L.,… Webster, S. L. (2015). Successful Implementation of Clinical Information Technology. Applied Clinical Informatics, 6(4), 698-715. DOI:10.4338/aci-2015-06-soa-0067
Ford, J. P., Huang, L., Richards, D. S., Ambinder, E. P., & Rosenberger, J. L. (2016). R.A.P.I.D. (Root Aggregated Prioritized Information Display): A single screen display for efficient digital triaging of medical reports. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61, 214-223. DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.001
Cruz, J. E., Shabosky, J. C., Albrecht, M., Clark, T. R., Milbrandt, J. C., Markwell, S. J., & Kegg, J. A. (2014). Typed versus Voice Recognition for Data Entry in an Electronic Health Record: Emergency Department Physician Time Utilization and Interruptions. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4). DOI:10.5811/westjem.2014.3.19658
Krauss, J. C., Warner, J. L., Maddux, S. E., Brown, J. R., Moldwin, R., Schorer, A. E., Ambinder, E. P. (2016). Data Sharing to Support the Cancer Journey in the Digital Era. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(3), 201-207. DOI:10.1200/jop.2015.007740
Marien, S., Krug, B., & Spinewine, A. (2016). Electronic tools to support medication reconciliation – a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocw068