A crisis arises in a normal working environment, affecting work and service delivery in general. According to the research framework, the mitigation method has a critical role in maintaining peace and resolving the issue. It is a strategy that lays out a step-by-step process for reducing risks and dangers as they arise. It brings all of the parties involved together, and this applied effort increases the chance of issue resolution (Gevorkian, 2019). It is possible to distinguish several factors that point to the requirement for long-term mitigation, including the mapping of critical issues and their potential threats and consequences. Consequently, as a means of managing the specified situation, mitigation helps in tolerating, compromising, and fostering teamwork.
The adoption of a policy and enforcement plan strengthens a code and establishes a procedure that should be followed to avoid a problem. Importantly, this method may be used in a variety of working environments and produces consistent results. Acceptance, transference, and restrictions are all important steps in resolving the crisis. Mitigation is crucial in resolving any type of crisis due to effective communication and enhanced expertise (Lindell, 2020). Therefore, its application is necessary for the early continuation of the normal working environment.
A response strategy for acute illnesses was created by the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The forum brought together CDC personnel and another health professional who could deal with crises and provide a realistic coordination structure. From 2000 to 2011, illness outbreaks and disasters increased in frequency and complexity, posing a danger to long-term health outcomes (Kouadio, 2012). The federal fiscal budget for 2004 was activated, providing $496 million to the health department (Mankato, 2020). The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) took exceptional measures to improve dependability after this event. For example, crucial service delivery was improved, services were available 24 hours a day, and local and international working relationships were strengthened. This moment marked the impressive preparedness of the United States and solidified the country’s position as a world-class provider of healthcare services.
References
Gevorkian, P. (2019). Importance of solar power system peak power performance and solar power system hazard mitigation. Large-Scale Solar Power Systems, 125–147. Web.
Kouadio, I. K., Aljunid, S., Kamigaki, T., Hammad, K., & Oshitani, H. (2012). Infectious diseases following natural disasters: Prevention and control measures. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 10(1), 95–104. Web.
Lindell, M. K. (2020). The Routledge handbook of urban disaster resilience: Integrating mitigation, preparedness, and recovery planning. Routledge.
Mankato, W. S. (2020). Importance of hazard mitigation. Blue Earth County. Web.