Mixed Method Research Design

Pros and Cons of Using a Mixed Method Research Design

The selection of research design is challenging for scholars who strive to cover as many issues as possible. This reasoning results in the preference of a mixed method processing quantitative and qualitative data for the precision of an outcome. This approach is a beneficial instrument incorporating such values as elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation (Gibson, 2017). However, it also includes specific cons alongside the apparent pros.

The principal complications of a mixed method research design are related to the human factor. The Bible says, “Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth” (“2 Timothy 2:15,” n.d.). Nevertheless, most researchers do not possess the required knowledge and experience, ensuring practicality and ethics at the same time (Hafsa, 2019). Therefore, they might fail to provide comprehensive results of their studies.

There are several advantages of the specified approach as well. They are related to the fact that a mixed method better reflects scholars’ needs because of the emerging complexity and the interrelation between various issues (Hafsa, 2019). In this way, it allows analyzing more aspects of a problem under consideration (Hafsa, 2019). Thus, the mentioned benefits lead to an outcome that implies more practical implications than other types of research design.

Indeed, the issue of bias takes a central place when the mixed method is used by researchers. It can also be connected to the need for integrity and the necessary knowledge regarding the subject of study (Hafsa, 2019). Their ability in terms of “rightly handling the word of truth” can be questioned as well (“2 Timothy 2:15,” n.d.). As a result, the values provided by this type of research can be compensated by its drawbacks (Gibson, 2017). Therefore, the successful implementation of a mixed method is conditional upon the attention of the participants in the first place.

References

2 Timothy 2:15. (n.d.). Literal World ESV.

Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193-223.

Hafsa, N. E. (2019). Mixed methods research: An overview for beginner researchers. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 58.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, February 24). Mixed Method Research Design. https://studycorgi.com/mixed-method-research-design/

Work Cited

"Mixed Method Research Design." StudyCorgi, 24 Feb. 2022, studycorgi.com/mixed-method-research-design/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Mixed Method Research Design'. 24 February.

1. StudyCorgi. "Mixed Method Research Design." February 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mixed-method-research-design/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Mixed Method Research Design." February 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mixed-method-research-design/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Mixed Method Research Design." February 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mixed-method-research-design/.

This paper, “Mixed Method Research Design”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.