Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study

Authors, Credentials, and Practice Areas

The research article in review was written by J. F. Ortega-Morán, B. Pagador, J. Maestre-Antequera, A. Arco, F. Monteiro, and F. M. Sánchez-Margallo (2020). The authors have professional expertise in surgery, nursing education, and healthcare technology, including new teaching methods such as blended learning and e-learning for minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Statement of the Problem

According to this study, the main problem is that many nurses lack sufficient experience in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This gap calls for effective training strategies to ensure that nurses develop competency in MIS techniques through e-learning and blended learning characterized by flexibility and accessibility.

Purpose of the Study

This study aimed to validate the online theoretical module of a laparoscopic blended learning course designed for nurses. It sought to examine students’ perceptions and satisfaction, sociability, usability metrics, and nurses’ overall interest in blended learning formats.

Gap in the Literature Identified

The literature lacks validation and effectiveness data for online and blended learning modules for MIS training among nursing students. Despite their popularity, evidence is needed to confirm the effectiveness of these methods as tools for improving nursing competencies in MIS.

Research Questions

How do nurses perceive an online theoretical module?

What are the sociability and usability metrics of the e-learning environment?

Review of the Literature

The literature review has provided an account of how MIS has developed over time, thereby necessitating specialized training for clinical practitioners. It cited earlier studies on e-learning and blended learning, highlighting their advantages, such as availability and flexibility. The article also identified that various medical and educational contexts employ these approaches but argued against their legitimacy, specifically within the nursing sector’s improperly evaluated MIS programs.

Population, Sample Size, and Sample Selection Process

Twenty-four nurses, 10 from Spain and 14 from Portugal, participated. The sample was chosen using convenience non-probability sampling, in which nurse data stored at partner institution databases were sent to recruitment emails. This sample size was considered acceptable, assuming that similar face-to-face courses typically have participant numbers within this range.

Study Design

The researchers used a quantitative design that incorporated both subjective and objective metrics to validate the online theoretical module. The data were collected through questionnaires and performance statistics, then analyzed under semi-controlled conditions.

Research Methods Used in the Study

This study used a combination of subjective and objective procedures. Subjective items included questionnaires measuring perception, satisfaction, and sociability, which experts validated to ensure reliability. Objective methods were web analytics and performance statistics for usability, such as interaction metrics and completion rates.

Research Findings

The findings indicated that the e-learning environment was generally well received, with high ratings for ease of access, layout, consistency, and navigation. Nonetheless, chat and forums were rarely used, indicating a need for moderation to enhance engagement. The videos were highly appreciated, but neither the problematic questionnaire balance nor the use of interactive 3D designs was satisfactory. Both Spanish and Portuguese nurses preferred blended learning because it is flexible and effective.

Limitations

Using a small, non-random sample and the lack of long-term outcome measures are essential drawbacks.

Article Critique

This study successfully meets a vital gap in nursing education by validating a novel e-learning model for MIS training. Therefore, future studies should have larger randomized samples to examine the effects of such training on clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Discussion of Future Nursing Practice

This formative online theoretical module was validated as a flexible, accessible training alternative for nurses that addresses the crucial need for MIS competency. The favorable results support the incorporation of blended learning into nursing education programs.

Reference

Ortega-Morán, J. F., Pagador, B., Maestre-Antequera, J., Arco, A., Monteiro, F., & Sánchez-Margallo, F. M. (2020). Validation of the online theoretical module of a minimally invasive surgery blended learning course for nurses: A quantitative research study. Nurse Education Today, 89.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2026, November 4). Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study. https://studycorgi.com/online-learning-course-for-nurses-on-minimally-invasive-surgery-critique-of-ortega-morn-et-al-s-study/

Work Cited

"Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study." StudyCorgi, 4 Nov. 2026, studycorgi.com/online-learning-course-for-nurses-on-minimally-invasive-surgery-critique-of-ortega-morn-et-al-s-study/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2026) 'Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study'. 4 November.

1. StudyCorgi. "Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study." November 4, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/online-learning-course-for-nurses-on-minimally-invasive-surgery-critique-of-ortega-morn-et-al-s-study/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study." November 4, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/online-learning-course-for-nurses-on-minimally-invasive-surgery-critique-of-ortega-morn-et-al-s-study/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2026. "Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study." November 4, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/online-learning-course-for-nurses-on-minimally-invasive-surgery-critique-of-ortega-morn-et-al-s-study/.

This paper, “Online Learning Course for Nurses on Minimally Invasive Surgery: Critique of Ortega-Morán et al.’s Study”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.