Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks

Summary of Job Articles by Marks and Fishback

The papers by Marks (2018) and Fishback (2017) present opposing perspectives on the significance of passion and fun in the workplace. In order to obtain job happiness, Fishbach’s paper underlines the significance of discovering intrinsic rewards and enjoyment at work. She contends that searching out interesting events, appreciating the daily routine, and concentrating on current benefits might result in a more fulfilling work life.

On the other hand, Marks disputes the notion that one should pursue one’s passion while beginning a business, contending that need, market demand, and profitability are more important than personal enthusiasm. He argues that even successful business owners frequently work on projects they are not enthusiastic about but must complete in order to keep their company alive.

Comparison of Job Articles by Marks and Fishback

Marks focuses on entrepreneurship, while Fishbach’s piece focuses on job satisfaction inside an existing job or career. Both authors acknowledge the importance of the practical components of employment, such as managing financial obligations and necessary chores. They agree that employment frequently entails routine tasks and less exciting responsibilities. Fishbach encourages finding fulfillment in one’s existing position by emphasizing its intrinsic merits, but Marks disputes the notion that passion should be the main motivator for launching a business. This is where their perspectives vary.

Personal Opinion

I identify more with Ayelet Fishbach’s viewpoint, which encourages people to find fulfillment and inherently valuable aspects of their professions. While pragmatism and profitability are critical, finding fulfillment in one’s everyday work is just as important. Finding the little joys in one’s work and finding ways to make it more delightful can, in my opinion, result in a more rewarding and long-lasting career. Gene Marks’ viewpoint on entrepreneurship is valid however I agree more with the notion that people should put job happiness first by concentrating on the enjoyment and intrinsic rewards of their current positions.

References

Fishback, Ayelet. “In Choosing a Job, Focus on the Fun.” New YorkTimes [NewYork], 2017. Web.

Marks, Gene. “Why Veteran Entrepreneurs Laugh at You for Following Your ‘Passion’.” Entrepreneur. 2018. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2025, April 12). Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks. https://studycorgi.com/passion-vs-pragmatism-in-the-workplace-contrasting-views-of-fishbach-and-marks/

Work Cited

"Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks." StudyCorgi, 12 Apr. 2025, studycorgi.com/passion-vs-pragmatism-in-the-workplace-contrasting-views-of-fishbach-and-marks/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2025) 'Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks'. 12 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks." April 12, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/passion-vs-pragmatism-in-the-workplace-contrasting-views-of-fishbach-and-marks/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks." April 12, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/passion-vs-pragmatism-in-the-workplace-contrasting-views-of-fishbach-and-marks/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2025. "Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks." April 12, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/passion-vs-pragmatism-in-the-workplace-contrasting-views-of-fishbach-and-marks/.

This paper, “Passion vs. Pragmatism in the Workplace: Contrasting Views of Fishbach and Marks”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.