Resilience Theory Overview

During my field experience at Vatsalya Adult Medical Daycare Center, I worked as an intern social worker student. Then, I faced a divorced woman, 55 years old, whose mother had unexpectedly died from a heart attack; it could be beneficial to employ the resilience theory in this case.

The presenting problem was that the woman found herself in a state of adversity because she was close to her mother, and her death resulted in the shock for the patient.

In that case, it was reasonable to help the woman promote resiliency. Turner (2017) admits that positive outcomes can be achieved when it is possible to cultivate valued social roles and uncover some interests. That is why a suitable intervention could be to make the client acquire a hobby that will help her overcome the crisis because she was divorced and lived alone after her mother’s death. It is so because a hobby means that the woman would divert attention from the adversity, promoting resiliency. Furthermore, such a regular activity would provide the patient with interest, which would be beneficial for her future life.

It is rational to evaluate the intervention offered using a single-subject design, and the article by Smith-Osborne and Whitehill Bolton (2013) is suitable since the researchers offer multiple instruments. Of them, one should draw attention to the Resilience Scale (RS), which is one of the adult scales.

Now, I will explain why I think that the selected instrument would be appropriate. Firstly, the RS can be applied to the identified case because the tool was initially developed for older women (Smith-Osborne & Whitehill Bolton, 2013). Secondly, it is a 25-item or 14-item scale, meaning that the client would not need to spend much time completing it (Smith-Osborne & Whitehill Bolton, 2013). Finally, Smith-Osborne and Whitehill Bolton (2013) mention that the RS “is available at no cost” (p. 119). This information demonstrates that it would be appropriate to select and use the given instrument.

References

Smith-Osborne, A., & Whitehill Bolton, K. (2013). Assessing resilience: A review of measures across the life course. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(2), 111-126. Web.

Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 14). Resilience Theory Overview. https://studycorgi.com/resilience-theory-overview/

Work Cited

"Resilience Theory Overview." StudyCorgi, 14 July 2022, studycorgi.com/resilience-theory-overview/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Resilience Theory Overview'. 14 July.

1. StudyCorgi. "Resilience Theory Overview." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/resilience-theory-overview/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Resilience Theory Overview." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/resilience-theory-overview/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Resilience Theory Overview." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/resilience-theory-overview/.

This paper, “Resilience Theory Overview”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.