First, self-defense can be determined through the perfect or perfect defense, depending on what the attack will cause. The attacker can cause death or severe injuries to the body of the person being attacked or even consequently end up causing severe emotional damage to the people involved. At times, the purpose of self-defense can be used during the battle, some assaults by another person, or maybe homicide (Neff Newitt, 2019). One cannot accept to be misused, and, thus, they use the self-defense mechanism. In most states globally, self-defense has been linked to a statutory defense, but it is based on one case to the other during the court proceedings. The self-defense that the defender has caused maybe the reason for the skirmish. When people decide to engage in physical contact, they might be thinking that there is an attack that might be planned. Some elements are missing, which might result in a lesser offense. It is necessary to have a rational conviction that the use of force is necessary. An example is when people engage in physical contact attacks to stop individuals from committing a crime they might be planning.
Defense consent is referred to as the relationship between the goal and justification, which can be done before the offender’s punishment. As many people have interpreted, consent is not a form of defense that applies to all offenses, and people should not mistake it. Some examples of offenses in which the protection of consent can be used include rape cases and assault. The battery is also another type of offense where the defense of consent can be applicable. People should never think that the security of consent will ever help them as it cannot defend them in court proceedings. The right way to ensure that one is not fined in a court of law is that every individual speaks the truth, and one will be judged accordingly without a lot of lies being found.
The mental condition of a person at some point can be an excuse for criminal conduct. A person with a problem with the brain cannot reason well and make helpful decisions, so why do many of them end up committing a crime and being jailed for their offense. In most scenery, people with brain problems attack innocent souls, and they can cause assault, and this is never their wish to engage themselves in the situations like this one. Despite the fact that they might not be able to comprehend what they are doing, they should undergo moral ramifications for their actions. Age also makes a person grow old and lose the ability to make informed decisions where necessary. Brain and mindset can help a person avoid engaging in some of the behaviors that are not allowed in society. Failure to observe what society has stated can lead to one being reported in court and being punished for mistakes that have been committed. It’s therefore essential during a court proceeding to look at some of these aspects. Sexual assault, for example, might be an excellent case to be used here.
Mental competence can be referred to as a person’s ability to be rational and express the thoughts that they might be having to the courts one is in the contract (Yin et al., 2021). On the other hand, legal sanity refers to a person’s actions being referred to as sane during trying times. During all of these cases in the court, one is usually expected to respond to their chosen activities. The only similarity between mental competence and legal sanity is that the two are used in the court during detraining who should be punished due to the mistakes which might be committed. The difference between legal sanity and mental competency is that legal sanity determines whether the defendant will be punished due to the actions committed and cognitive competence. It determines whether a person will appear in a court trial or will not depend on the person’s mental health. Determination is required during the trial of the defendants.
The person involved in the fight with the person who just died should be held liable for these mistakes. In the society where people live today, some criminal and immoral behaviors, which include fights, have been discouraged, and people are not supposed to engage in any physical or emotional fights. People, who engage in some of these behaviors, even if it is domestic violence, should be punished as they set bad examples for society and humanity. The person who fought with the dead person should be liable for that mistake. The person could have even contracted Covid-19 as it spreads quickly and can affect anyone in the world (Cunha et al., 2021). The person could have been employed with the virus. Coronavirus is one of the diseases that have hit the world record headlines and has caused adverse effects on families and society. Therefore, people need to take care of the virus and devise the best ways possible to handle the virus and its effects.
Reference
Cunha, M., Domingos, A., Rocha, V., & Torres, M. (2021). How many could have been saved? Effects of social distancing on COVID-19. Revista De Administração Pública, 55(1), 12-26. Web.
Neff Newitt, V. (2019). Recruiting an old drug for a new purpose in the battle against pediatric AML. Oncology Times, 41(9). Web.
Yin, Z., Du, Y., She, P., He, X., & Yang, F. (2021). Generalized 2-step phase-shifting algorithm for fringe projection. Optics Express. Web.