State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry

Citation of Case

Court of Appeals of New Mexico, State v. Tixier, 551 P.2d 987 (1976), 89 N.M. 297.

Parties

Plaintiff-Appellee: State of New Mexico.

Defendant-Appellant: Arthur Ray Tixier.

Facts

Arthur Ray Tixier appealed a burglary conviction stemming from an incident at an auto store with a burglary alarm system. The alarm sounded as an object broke a light beam, and police responded quickly to find a four-by-eight-inch hole in the garage door near the opening mechanism. The defendant was found hidden behind stacked tires, which were located after a door piece was removed from his person.

Notably, the burglary transpired after the store’s closing hours. The direct evidence was lacking that the defendant’s body entered the store. The court upheld the conviction, holding that any slight instrument that enters a building and breaches the security plan constitutes sufficient evidence of entry for a burglary charge.

Issue

The key issue was whether the evidence presented was sufficient to prove that a burglary conviction was a valid outcome of an unauthorized entry.

Holding

The court affirmed the burglary conviction.

Reasoning

Something had been crossing over the beam of light inside the going-through for a four-by-eight-inch hole near the garage door, triggering the burglary alarm system. The state argued that the defendant reached into the hole to open the locked door that had set off the alarm. Although the evidence established that no part of the defendant’s body moved inside, the reasonable inference is that some unidentified instrument the defendant used crossed the light beam and tripped the burglary alarm. The court held that any instrument penetration into the interior of the building constitutes evidence of entry for burglary. Burglary is considered an offense against building security, and breaching this safety by any entry of an instrument into a building equals an entry under the statute relating to similar offenses.

Disposition by Court

Affirmed.

Work Cited

Court of Appeals of New Mexico, State v. Tixier, 551 P.2d 987 (1976), 89 N.M. 297.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2026, April 30). State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry. https://studycorgi.com/state-v-tixier-burglary-conviction-upheld-despite-limited-physical-entry/

Work Cited

"State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry." StudyCorgi, 30 Apr. 2026, studycorgi.com/state-v-tixier-burglary-conviction-upheld-despite-limited-physical-entry/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2026) 'State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry'. 30 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry." April 30, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/state-v-tixier-burglary-conviction-upheld-despite-limited-physical-entry/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry." April 30, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/state-v-tixier-burglary-conviction-upheld-despite-limited-physical-entry/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2026. "State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry." April 30, 2026. https://studycorgi.com/state-v-tixier-burglary-conviction-upheld-despite-limited-physical-entry/.

This paper, “State v. Tixier: Burglary Conviction Upheld Despite Limited Physical Entry”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.