Introduction
The researchers, Bak et al., aimed to answer two questions while conducting their study titled ‘Strategies to Promote Nurses’ Health.’ They aimed to answer what student nurses perceive to be the underlying causes of nurses’ health-related behaviors. Researchers strove to discover what strategies student nurses think might improve nurses’ health-related behaviors.
The importance of getting answers to these questions consisted of studying the phenomenon of nurses’ health-related behaviors, understanding students’ attitudes, and the factors they consider necessary in this problem. In addition, this study is critical because, based on the results obtained, approaches and strategies can be developed to support the health of the nursing workforce.
Qualitative Methodology Appropriateness
Bak et al. (2020) chose a qualitative study using focus groups for their scientific work. Pre-registration student nurses in a Scottish university were involved as participants. Preference was given to second and third-year students with more clinical experience and knowledge. This method of conducting research work can be considered appropriate to answer the research question since it is based on student feedback (Adler et al., 2019; Busetto et al., 2020). The authors justified the research design by providing an opportunity to get information using open discussions about sensitive issues about working in a clinical setting.
Recruitment and Sample
The participants for the scientific work were selected based on the year of study at a higher educational institution. Second and third-year students were selected, which is appropriate based on the design and setting of the study, as they can provide the most valuable insight for researchers. In addition, it is noted that no incentive was offered to the study participants.
Data Collection
Conducting online questionnaires via email was chosen as the primary data source. This was used to obtain personal information and maintain confidentiality, critical for qualitative research and ethics. Moreover, 2-hour audio-recorded and transcribed meetings with researchers were held to obtain the necessary data on the attitude of students toward nurses’ health-related behaviors.
For complete information, an open discussion on health-related behaviors, perceived causes on post-it notes, and group discussion were conducted. Discussions and post-it notes contributed to a more detailed study of students’ attitudes to the problem of health-related behaviors of medical specialists. Based on the study design, we can conclude that the methods and tools for acquiring information were appropriate. The researchers described the forms of the data collection.
Data Analysis Rigor
The researchers provide an in-depth description of the analysis process, describing each procedure used to collect and examine the study data. The Behavior Change Wheel and two-stage coding approach were used for this scientific work, which provides efficiency (Richardson et al., 2019). The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) was implemented to provide transparency and rigor in study reporting.
Research stated, “Scholarly journals widely endorse COREQ, and the checklist has a particularly technical and a-political approach to achieve complete reporting of qualitative research” (Buus & Perron, 2020, p. 103452). The study did not note any contradictory data, and the researcher did not provide information regarding their role, potential bias, and influence during the analysis and collection of data.
Summary
In conclusion, it is worth noting that this study has benefits as it provides factors that can severely impact nurses’ health-related behaviors. Moreover, it focuses on providing strategies and interventions that can help limit the problem of this behavior’s deterioration. I would use this article to change my attitude toward my attitude towards my behavior. Researchers note that the limiting factors of this work are the small sample size, the sensitivity of the topic for students, and the involvement of students studying disabilities or mental health nursing. A vital point is the rigor of using a validated data collection method and theoretically informed analysis strategy.
References
Adler, K., Salanterä, S., & Zumstein-Shaha, M. (2019). Focus group interviews in child, youth, and parent research: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18.
Bak, M. A. R., Hoyle, L. P., Mahoney, C., & Kyle, R. G. (2020). Strategies to promote nurses’ health: A qualitative study with student nurses. Nurse Education in Practice, 48, 102860.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, 1-10.
Buus, N., & Perron, A. (2020). The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 102, 103452.
Richardson, M., Khouja, C. L., Sutcliffe, K., & Thomas, J. (2019). Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews. BMJ Open, 9(6), e024950.