The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case

This is a legal case between Aero Industries, INC, against Demonte Fabricating limited and Quick Draw Tarpaulin systems. The Aero Industries are accusing DeMonte of violating the laid trade laws. Quick Draw, however, moves to dismiss the motion for lacking personal jurisdiction. In this case, the two companies manufacture and sell equipment and accessories for use with dump trucks, tractors, trailer vehicles, and flatbed trucks. Such an accessory is the tarpaulin system that the two companies produce (Aero Industries, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating, Ltd., and Quick Draw Tarpaulin Systems, Inc). Although they produce the same products, they are located in different regions as Aero is an Indian company, while Quick Draw has offices in Dearborn, Michigan.

Aero presents a case accusing the quick draw company of crossing the boundaries and making sales in India. According to jurisdictional laws, each company should only trade within its boundaries, and in case it makes more than two sales in the other’s trade region, that is considered illegal. Quick Draw company not only made two sales to an Indian company but also operates an online website. The site provides a forum for interactions between companies and outsiders.

The public policy under question is the trade policy that regulates the flow of goods in and out of a country. The policy dictates that each company should only sell its products within its jurisdictional area. I disagree with the policy as it limits the expansion of businesses. Technology has facilitated global interactions both by phone and through websites (Wood et al. 36). However, such policies should be changed to conform to the present-day norm and norms. The current market has intensified, and the production of goods has also increased. Therefore, each company should be allowed to access the universal market without any legal restrictions.

Works Cited

United States District Court, S.D. Indian Indianapolis Division. Aero Industries, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating, Ltd., and Quick Draw Tarpaulin Systems, Inc. Docket No 17. 2005. Web.

Wood, Stephen A., et al. “Trade and the Equitability of Elobal Food Nutrient distribution.” Nature Sustainability, vol.1, no.1, 2018, pp. 34-37.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, April 9). The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case. https://studycorgi.com/the-aero-industries-v-demonte-fabricating-case/

Work Cited

"The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case." StudyCorgi, 9 Apr. 2023, studycorgi.com/the-aero-industries-v-demonte-fabricating-case/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case'. 9 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case." April 9, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-aero-industries-v-demonte-fabricating-case/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case." April 9, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-aero-industries-v-demonte-fabricating-case/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case." April 9, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-aero-industries-v-demonte-fabricating-case/.

This paper, “The Aero Industries v. DeMonte Fabricating Case”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.