Introduction
Leadership is a critical aspect that controls many elements of life in the world. It is important to have leaders in society since they play a key role in establishing the commendable well-being of the community and the environment. Without leadership, society would have incomplete living realms based on lack of responsibility, warfare, diseases, immorality, and primitivity, among other adverse impacts (Grint 317).
It is absurd for a person to think the world would be better without leaders since human beings need to be guided, controlled, and shown the right steps towards important factions of life such as healthcare, politics, economy, and sociological perspectives. If the world lacked leadership, there could be warfare between people internally or internationally, globalization would be slow or absent, the economy would fall, and negative outcomes, such as imperialism to unindustrialized countries, would cease.
Impacts of the Absence of Leadership in the World
Lack of leadership worldwide would lead to warfare between the communities nationally and globally. Countries would fight with each other due to a scramble for important resources such as minerals, energy, and technology, among others that would be fought for to ensure each party remains the superpower (Goldenhar et al. 270). For instance, the U.S. and China’s long cold war would escalate further into a real fight where dozens of people would lose their lives, others displaced, and the general environment distorted due to violence. Although these aspects are seen in various parts of the world today, the measure would be higher than now if there were no leadership.
Mohanty (para. 1) says, “If China and Japan went to war, the conflict would spread to much of Asia and beyond. The same would happen if the U.S. and Russia went to war and other major powers like India and Brazil.” These segments from the author show that leadership is a critical factor that bars geopolitical tensions which may result in violence and interference with peace in the world. Whenever there is a lack of harmony, many people suffer.
If the world had no leadership, globalization would be affected significantly as there would be no push for innovation and boosting of information and expertise power on various subjects. According to Cortellazzo et al. (p. 4), “The leadership role has become vital to capture the real value of digitalization, notably by managing and retaining talent via better reaching for, connecting and engaging with employees….” It means that for a society to grow in terms of what people do in their daily work, digital elements must be integrated through careful consideration that involves the hands of leadership.
It is important to note that technologies are shared between one party to another where a solution to a problem is arrived at, making a world interconnected. Leaders decide how collaborations are formed between one country or region and what benefit comes after the engagement occurs as far as the welfare of society is concerned. Through leadership, digital tech companies have adopted holistic ways that can be used to deal with major issues such as diseases, cybercrime, and many other adverse components that threaten the normal way of life.
Lacking leadership means the economy would be sabotaged from the key decisions that would alter how revenue is generated and income shared within the community. There is a need to address global warming that leads to climate change. It is evident that agricultural activities are affected whenever there is climate change, meaning productivity is limited. Leadership controls the circulation of currency from one region to another and how the same can affect businesses, hence, impacting the world’s economic stability.
Norrlöf (p. 3) says, ‘The networked relations underpinning that hegemony has been strained. Trump’s questioning of U.S. security alliances, the trade order, the dollar system, and climate agreements has weakened the US-led order.” That shows the decision to trade in countries affiliated with a specific currency may affect an existing international currency index, such as the dollar system. For example, with the dollar’s stability as a measure of value across many countries, a collaboration between global leaders to promote another currency means the economic systems in many regions will fall. (By 38). Therefore, the absence of leadership would mean dynamism in adopting a uniform index when it comes to global trade.
Assuming the world had no leadership, it would be difficult to have responsible citizens. People need to be triggered to act rationally for their benefit and for the environment surrounding them. For example, leaders catalyze people to conserve the ecosystem for the realization of sustainable development in terms of agriculture and environmental safety among other outcomes. Another example is seen in Grint’s (para. 4) study which shows that “Critical problems are crises that need a commander to coerce her or his followers into line to avoid a catastrophe – ordering schools and business to shut for the foreseeable future would be an example of this decision-making.” Thus, leadership serves as a key controller of actions that must be taken to prevent the escalation of a problem.
However, a world without leadership does not mean that everything will go in the wrong direction. Leadership comes with assimilation into adopting cultures that may seem new to a given society. At times, leaders force different aspects into people’s hearts, bringing significant levels of neocolonialism, a man-eat-man society, and a community lacking identity.
Chowdhury and Sundaram (para. 12) say, “The IMF … makes conditions and says, ‘if you follow these examples, your economy will improve’. But where are the examples of economies booming in the Third World because they accepted the conditions of the IMF?” That suggests that the first-world countries have contributed to the stagnation of non-industrialized nations due to imperialistic leadership, which seems to have taken root worldwide. The author feels that this kind of leadership means adversity to victims, and leaving the affected people to make holistic decisions may create a better world for them. The refute that a world without leadership would be awful does not mean the existence of leadership is unnecessary. Still, it reveals that leadership has its cost, and people would thrive without it, although to an immeasurable capacity.
Conclusion
A world without leadership means violence, economic fall, and decreased globalization. If countries were left to fight each other, many people would be adversely affected, meaning there may be a lack of peace. When leadership is absent, no quality decision can be made regarding issues such as climate change, the need to conserve the environment, and the economic factor, as many countries would be less productive. If the world had no leadership, tech, and innovation would not penetrate the entire global perspective, and that means a lack of leaders would cost globalization. However, leadership would not be required if it leads to imperialism, a dragging factor in developing third-world countries. Based on the essay, leadership is not uncalled for but should be regulated to avoid bias, inequality, and distortion of existing values and beliefs. A world without leadership would be hectic, which may cause every aspect of life to have a negative experience.
Works Cited
By, Rune Todnem. “Leadership: In Pursuit of Purpose.” Journal of Change Management, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 30–44. Web.
Chowdhury, Anis, and Jomo Kwame Sundaram. “Africa Struggles with Neo-Colonialism.” Centre Tricontinental. 2022. Web.
Cortellazzo, Laura, et al. “The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A Review.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, no. 8, 2019, pp. 55–67. Web.
Goldenhar, Linda M., et al. “Leadership Skills for Strengthening Jobsite Safety Climate.” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 70, no. 5, 2019, pp. 263–271. Web.
Grint, Keith. “Leadership, Management and Command in the Time of the Coronavirus.” Leadership, vol. 16, no. 3, 2020, pp. 314–319. Web.
Mohanty, Biswajeet. “What Would Happen to the World If It Had No Leaders?” Icy Destiny, 2022. Web.
Norrlöf, Carla. “Is Covid-19 the End of U.S.U.S. Hegemony? Public Bads, Leadership Failures and Monetary Hegemony.” International Affairs, vol. 96, no. 5, 2020, pp. 1281–1303. Web.