Introduction
The First World War was a military conflict of unprecedented scale and destruction in Europe. It fundamentally shifted the politics of the continent and surrounding regions and affected the everyday lives of many citizens and soldiers. France was one of the primary participants in the war for the Allied Powers, directly fighting Germany of the Central Powers, with whom it shares a border. Much of the well-known trench warfare and battles of the Western Front during World War I occurred in France, causing unspeakable horrors and annihilation of whole villages. It was a bloody and destructive war that left a traumatic mark on France’s society in history.
This paper will argue that life in France fundamentally shifted after World War I, impacting the social welfare and various social issues (mental health, reintegration of veterans, demographics), as well as the economic and political status quo in the country.
Background
World War I came at a great cost for France, being involved in supporting its Allies. However, being at the center of the military action on the Western Front, France was one of the few nations that suffered the direct impact and destruction of the war. The Allied Powers came out victorious in World War I, but France bore the price. France mobilized 8 million soldiers, but its losses exceeded 1.8 million, and approximately another 1 million were severely injured or crippled. That number is leading amongst Western nations, exceeded only by the Russian Empire and major Central Powers (Reperes, 2011). Large swathes of France’s northeastern territory, including previously strong industrial and agricultural areas, were destroyed, as some of the major battles of the war, such as Battles of Lorraine, Verdun, Somme, Aisne, and many others, were fought on French land. France, as a country after the war, was at a turning point.
Economy
The French economy after World War I was in ruins. It was a combination of factors that created ideal conditions for a financial crisis. A significant portion of France’s economic capacity was destroyed in the war, particularly in the industrial regions of the North. The war handicapped the national production system and infrastructure. The damage was extensive, including 712,000 buildings, 20,000 industrial compounds, 2.5 million agricultural hectares, 2,000km of canals alongside 2000 bridges, 62,000km of road, and 5,000km of railroad were completely destroyed (Le Bras, 2015). Throughout the country, significant rebuilding efforts had to be undertaken along with skyrocketing costs of healthcare for returning and already wounded soldiers. Special commissions and courts were established to evaluate and rule on disputes over damages, while policies enacted focused on the state facing its responsibilities of reconstruction. Rapid rebuilding of devastated areas did occur, being highly successful and virtually complete by 1925. However, France faced chronic monetary issues, which led to waves of financial downturns all the way until World War II, never fully recovering.
The fiscal crisis in France was inevitable. The French government sought to collect money by selling treasury bonds Banque de France at high interest rates to recoup financial flows, which were immediately reinvested in reconstruction, with taxes being increased as well. Up to 1930, more than 25 billion francs were collected, with 70% of the war damages being rebuilt with that money (Le Bras, 2015). However, initially, after the war, the franc was weak due to currency disorder and high levels of debt that the country. By 1924, the unstable franc went into decline, with a significant danger of collapse. Eventually, with some highly conservative reforms, cutting government expenses, and raising taxes, the Poincaré Bloc National government was able to stabilize the currency at one-fifth of its value in 1914, leading to evident inflation. France was in grim debt after the war and reconstruction efforts, owing the United States nearly $4 billion and another $1.7 billion to Great Britain. The French were waiting for strong reparations from Germany, but their ruined economy had no ability to pay, nor did the Treaty of Versailles pursue such harsh economic reparations as France had originally desired. By 1923, Germany completely refused to pay, forcing France to essentially annex the Ruhr, a coal-producing region, to somehow stabilize their economy (Adamthwaite, 1997). The French public opinion strongly suggests the stance that France should not repay its debts until German reparations are complete.
Due to population and infrastructure loss, industrial productivity in France did not return to pre-war levels until 1924, actually growing by 40% by 1929. However, the devalued franc was a burden for exports, as soon as the economy was stabilized in 1926, the world was hit with the Great Depression in 1929. France weathered the crisis better than many others, having still supported the gold standards exchange in banks (Lauterbach, 1943). In the decade after the end of World War I, the French public was weary and exhausted from the economic swings and dangers of potential crises. It was not a healthy environment for the prosperity of business and enterprise, while a large portion of France’s production capacity and revenue went to repaying its debts, facing strong political pressure from the United States.
Politics and National Consciousness
In terms of foreign policy, France was actively involved in the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles and other international agreements for Europe. In fact, it pursued very direct and vengeful politics against Germany, with a relentless and coordinated effort to destroy Germany politically, economically, and socially in any way possible. France wanted to see Germany in a permanently isolated and defeated condition, which the other allies like Britain and the US saw as counterproductive. Arguably, France was seen as a major barrier to the reestablishment of peace in Europe. Eventually, a compromise was reached, but the harshest terms of the Treaty of Versailles were largely there due to French insistence (Jacobson, 1983).
Domestically, the interwar period was the waning days of the French Third Republic that would end with the occupation of France during World War 2. After WWI, domestic politics were dominated by two main political alliances: the right-center Block National led by the likes of Clemenceau and Poincaré, and the left-center Cartel des gauches led by the Radical Socialist Party. The Bloc national was generally more popular and supported by business, military, and church groups, as their primary aims were to rapidly rebuild France and take revenge on Germany by any possible political or economic means. The party is credited for stabilizing the franc and showing France at least a small period of growth and prosperity in the late 1920s, strongly reviving public morale (Judt, 1976).
The national consciousness and sentiment after the war was still very aggressive and distrustful, particularly against Germans but also its allies such as the UK, who were seen as appeasing the Germans. Politics were far from stable as the parties continued to exchange power over the next two decades prior to WWII as people sought answers and some sense of return to normalcy that neither political leadership could give. There was a sense of urgency long after the end of the war, which is why patriotism in any of its expressions was popular, emphasizing that the public strongly believed in the righteousness of France. While potentially the desire to return to pre-war life was prevalent, the nation was grieving from the massive death toll and the cultural impact of the conflict, which made demobilization and dismantling aggressive war-time propaganda of the war years much more difficult and had a crucial stake in the status quo of French society well into the interwar period.
Society and Daily Life
As discussed earlier, there was a significant blow to the population, and the human cost was high for a medium-sized country such as France. Virtually every household was affected, and the presence of the war was highly felt years after the conflict subsided. The French society was a mourning society in these years. As reflected by American visitors to France in 1925, “there is perhaps an undertone of quiet sadness in place of natural joyousness which case a glamour over the life of former times” (Lauterbach, 1943). This is the sentiment reflected in the famous novels of the interwar era, such as Clemenceau’s (1930) Grandeurs et misères d’une Victoire, a memoir reflecting on the war and its aftermaths, as well as the fictional Voyage au bout de la nuit by Céline Louis-Ferdinand (1932). The population was devastated and mourning heavily, attempting to recover from the existential crisis it faced during the war. France also entered a period of high uncertainty and a protracted cultural and identity crisis (Winter, 1995).
In the interwar period, it was difficult for the French to escape the grim recollections of the war. Ranging from memorial services to published memoirs, it had overtaken society, potentially as a manner of collective grieving. There were also the evident impacts of the war, destroyed roads, and buildings, lack of a stable economy (Grazel, 2006). The social demographics shifted as well. There were now millions of veterans returning from the war, many with nightmares and PTSD. Nearly 1.2 million soldiers and citizens were disabled, while 600,000 widows were left without husbands, and 760,000 orphans without parents (Demiaux, 2015). Approximately 1.4 million refugees fled from the German invasion and settled in the country but were alienated. France won the war, but the victory had come with such a cost that it was bittersweet.
After the war, France had to deal with various social aspects, such as the demobilization of more than 5 million men and the reintegration of these veterans into society, which is a difficult concept at such a scale. The war lasted for 4 years, and there was yet little knowledge about PTSD and other mental health issues that would haunt these veterans. Even if not disabled, many experienced issues such as tremors, unsettling behavior, and terrors (Prestwich, 2003). During the war, women entered the production workforce massively, which greatly contributed to their agency, although it was not until 1944 that French women were enfranchised and given the right to vote (Darrow, 2000). Slowly, the men rotated back into jobs as part of demobilization, but many women remained as there was a critical workforce shortage. Previous employers were mandated to rehire returning soldiers by 1918 legislation. Meanwhile, the government relaxed immigration laws, allowing for the entry of nearly 2 million immigrants in the years after the war to fill gaps in the workforce (Winter & Wall, 1988). For millions of men, re-engaging into civil life was difficult, with much tension in many households that were struggling to both survive the economic crises and adapt to the new realities. However, the general population tended to treat veterans with respect, and the government sought to establish a moral economy of gratitude. Nevertheless, due to inflating prices of food and growing unemployment in a struggling economy, the public was greatly dissatisfied and demonstrated low morale, with cities seeing waves of protests in 1919-1920 (Becker, 1985).
There was also a period of cultural demobilization. Despite the Treaty of Versailles serving as the official end of the war, the early interwar period was a blurred and inconsistent time where the French sought to return to pre-war normalcy but struggled with the legacy of total warfare that had overtaken the country for many years. Cultural and intellectual activities were slow to resume, while contact with German peers did not occur until the late 1920s. Society remained on high alert and almost paranoid, as there were accusations of lack of patriotism or cooperation with the enemy, such as the ones faced by Joseph Caillaux, a former Minister who was accused of anti-patriotic behavior (Demiaux, 2015). By the mid-1920s, it became evident to French society that a return to the status quo of the pre-war era was impossible. The peacetime issues of the European continent had no long-term solutions, as the Treaty of Versailles was perceived to be weak and ineffective by many in France. There was also a massive doubt about whether the sacrifices made by the country during the war were worth it, but at the same time, it led to the prevalence of pacifism in French society and politics going forward (Becker, 1985). While demobilization, both literal and cultural, finally did see completion, it was evident that it fundamentally changed the country’s identity and history forever.
Conclusion
France had undergone a traumatic and devastating experience during World War I when the fighting of unprecedented scales had come to its land and destroyed much of its livelihood. It fundamentally changed France, ranging from its economic stability and growth to socio-political attitudes. Primarily, French society had to face many issues it had never encountered. French resiliency helped get it through the crises of the interwar period, but it can be argued that because of the negative impact that the combination of these factors had on the country, it was poorly prepared for defense in World War II.
Reference List
Adamthwaite, A. (1997). France, Germany and the Treaty of Versailles: France’s bid for power in Europe, 1919-1924. Das deutsche Problem in der neueren Geschichte, pp.75–88.
Becker, J.-J., The Great War and the French People (Oxford: Berg, 1985).
Céline, L.-F., Voyage au bout de la nuit (Paris: Denoël et Steele, 1932).
Clemenceau, G., Grandeurs et misères d’une victoire (Paris: Plon, 1930).
Darrow, M., French Women and the First World War: Stories of the Home Front (Oxford: Berg, 2000).
Demiaux, V. (2015) ‘Post-war Societies (France)’, International Encyclopedia of the First World War, Web.
Grayzel, S.R., ‘The “souls of soldiers”: civilians under fire in First World War France’, Journal of Modern History 78:3 (2006), 588-622.
Jacobson, J. (1983). Strategies of French Foreign Policy after World War I. The Journal of Modern History, 55(1), 78–95. Web.
Judt, T. (1976). The French Socialist and the Cartel des Gauches of 1924. Journal of Contemporary History, 11(2), pp.199–215.
Le Bras, S. (2015) ‘Post-war Economies’, International Encyclopedia of the First World War, Web.
Lauterbach, A.T. (1943). Economic Demobilization in France After the First World War. The Journal of Politics, 5(3), pp.237–269.
Prestwich, P.E. (2003). “Victims of War”? Mentally-Traumatized Soldiers and the State, 1918-1939. Journal of The Western Society of French History, 31, 243-254.
Reperes (2011) ‘World War I casualties’, Centre Robert Schuman. Web.
Winter, J., Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Winter, J. and Wall, R. (eds.), The Upheaval of War: Family, Work and Welfare in Europe, 1914-1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).