Introduction
In the development of an organization, management plays a crucial role. Moreover, the leadership style directly affects the employees’ development within the company, the organization’s success, its corporate culture, and the retention of specialists (Stone et al., 2020). Accordingly, depending on the type and functions of the business, the most productive management style should be selected. Hence, it is essential to evaluate a grocery store’s management style and explain my leadership choice.
Description of the Grocery Store
I chose a product store because it is one of the most quickly recouped and least expensive forms of private property. The purpose of the store is to engage in entrepreneurial activity, specifically the sale of food to the end consumer, through a system of grocery store salespeople. Meanwhile, the primary products presented in the store are vegetables, fruits, dairy, and meat products. There is also a separate department with refrigerators and freezers where frozen food and products are preserved. The grocery store is located at an intersection in a densely populated area, particularly at 260 La Brea Avenue in Los Angeles. For this reason, there are always a large number of people in the store choosing and buying products.
Management Style
It is essential to emphasize that the grocery store has a human resource style of administration. This is basically a division of the organization’s management process by function. Thus, in human resource management, personnel are considered as a source to be controlled. In this view, an autocratic approach to management most often prevails (Stone et al., 2020). Therefore, in the store, employees were clearly fulfilling their duties. I witnessed a conversation between the head of the butcher’s department and his subordinates when the head of the department gave orders and did not ask for the opinion of his colleagues. Although they were discussing the tactics of placing products on the shelves, the employees of the department knew better, based on their own experience, at what height and shelf to place a specific product to be bought.
Accordingly, I would not want to work in this grocery store because the manager solely makes decisions and controls every stage of the team’s work. This negatively affects the relationships between workers and overall sales performance. Therefore, if I were the manager of this store, I would suggest human relations as an alternative to human resources. Under this leadership style, I would provide my team with freedom of action in their work and provide them with support and advice if necessary (Stone et al., 2020). Accordingly, staff would attempt to work more productively because they would realize that their experience and knowledge are valued. This would increase employee job satisfaction and improve the grocery store’s revenue.
Conclusion
Therefore, my observations in the grocery store allowed me to evaluate the management style. As a result, I assessed the irrationality of using the human resource leadership style. This is because this style does not consider the employee’s personal experience, and the power is concentrated only with managers. Instead, it is crucial that leaders advise, support, and utilize employees’ experiences and observations. This is because it is the workers who are in regular contact with customers in the store who can determine a successful sales strategy. Therefore, the supervision of employees to analyze the management style of a modern organization.
Reference
Stone, R. J., Cox, A., & Gavin, M. (2020). Human resource management. John Wiley & Sons.