Introduction
For decades, animal testing in scientific research has been a source of contention, with those in favor and those opposed to it both presenting strong, well-reasoned arguments. Supporters of animal testing suggest it is essential in order to progress scientific knowledge and make medical advances. At the same time, opponents of the practice consider it inhumane and call for its prohibition. This essay will discuss both points of view and assess their pros and cons.
Pro Argument
Proponents of animal testing argue that it is necessary for scientific progress and the development of treatments and vaccines for various diseases. Animal testing has enabled scientists to gain a better understanding of the human body and its physiological processes, leading to more effective treatments for a variety of illnesses, including cancer, diabetes, and infectious diseases such as polio and measles (Coates, 2019). Additionally, animal testing can also help researchers understand how drugs and treatments interact with the body, helping to develop new and improved treatments. By providing researchers with valuable data, animal testing has helped to save thousands of lives and improve the quality of life for many.
Con Argument
One of the most significant arguments against animal testing is that it is cruel. Animals used in testing are typically kept in cramped cages, deprived of food and water, and subjected to painful procedures (Coates, 2019). Furthermore, animal testing is not always reliable, as the physiology of animals used in testing is often distinct from that of humans, meaning that the results of animal testing may not be applicable to humans. Moreover, there are alternative testing methods, such as computer simulations and tissue cultures, that are more humane and reliable than animal testing.
Conclusion
To summarize, animal testing can be necessary for advancing scientific research and creating new treatments for illnesses; however, it can also be an inhumane practice. Both sides of the debate have valid points, and the decision of whether to use animal testing should be considered thoughtfully. There are more humane and accurate alternatives to animal testing, and these should be strongly considered. Finally, animal testing should only be used when there is no other possible choice and the advantages of the research clearly outweigh the risks to the animals.
Reference
Coates, K. (2019). Critical perspectives on animal testing. Enslow Publishing, LLC.