Introduction
Reasoning is an essential aspect of any dialogue, as this aspect helps people build mutual understanding. Cooperation and contracts can only be made because reasoning leads people to some logical conclusions about the options being considered. Thus, each type of reasoning can work differently, which affects how people think and make decisions. Argumentative reasoning is imperative to provide all the facts and prove their point of view to someone.
Type of Reasoning
The research paper under consideration uses argumentative reasoning. Jones (2012) argues that in this way, any information can be given to obvious weaknesses and dispelled after that. Thus, these shortcomings in specific people may cease to play an essential role in human thinking. Human thinking has been actively developed to provide the most effective and high-quality communication and persuasion. In this regard, logical accuracy is not as crucial as argumentativeness and consistency in the story.
Argumentative reasoning consists of several sequentially placed and presented arguments. They should be the leading force in the cascade of arguments and proofs. This method differs because it does not prefer logical reasoning but the human desire to speak and convince others. Thus, argumentative reasoning differs from what people usually use (Jones, 2012). People’s cognitive bias is that they must constantly argue with something to feel its worth. In addition, in evolution, man has created tools such as confirmation bias and framing effects that can help form and make compelling arguments that can work against certain opponents. Argumentation can be built in such a way that a person begins to take into account all the factors that initially seemed insignificant or impossible. Thus, forming an image necessary to convince a person is possible.
Problem-Solving Process and Application of Argumentative Reasoning
Problem-solving is related to the social context, which can change depending on how argumentative reasoning affects people and their thinking. The development of reasoning can encourage people to find compromises that can lead them to a specific result. Group discussions and debates can help uncover people’s thinking in the debate (Gladwell, 2009). At the same time, the rational expression of opinions by both parties to the conflict can contribute to resolving the conflict situation. It is possible to objectively evaluate different points of view only with the help of all interlocutors, who can clearly and consistently convey their thoughts.
The application of argumentative reasoning in relation to existing problems can be done in education and training. This method of application is because the chosen type of reasoning can help develop critical thinking skills, which is helpful in comprehensively evaluating large amounts of information (Lawson, 2010). As a result, the use of argumentative reasoning can lead to higher communication efficiency, which plays a significant role in providing better interaction for students. Argumentative reasoning can be helpful in my area of interest as it can help me better articulate and express my opinion. Taking a stand on any issue is essential as it is necessary to achieve justice.
Conclusion
Argumentative reasoning is a way of building a dialogue that can improve relationships between people by establishing better contact and eliminating possible areas of confrontation. Thus, selecting detailed arguments and thinking through the circumstances is critical to correctly designing the dialogue and achieving the goals. Argumentative reasoning can help develop qualified programs to deepen the studied areas in education.
References
Gladwell, M. (2009). What the dog saw and other adventures. Brown and Company.
Jones, D. (2012). The argumentative ape. New Scientist, 214(2866), 32-36. Web.
Lawson, A. E. (2010). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94(2), 336–364. Web.