Rethinking Language: Should We Change How We Speak About Addiction?
The Associated Press (AP) has made a positive move by revising the vocabulary used to refer to individuals with substance abuse disorders. I support this change because it separates the person from the illness and encourages a more respectful and compassionate attitude. By using person-first language, such as “people with heroin addiction” instead of “addicts,” it helps to humanize individuals and lessen the harmful stereotypes linked to addiction.
Media’s Role in Language Reform: Why the AP Is Leading the Change
The AP has decided to offer guidance on modifying language because language significantly affects how people view and think about things. By offering advice on using more precise and less stigmatizing language, the AP is helping to change how people discuss addiction in public discussions. This language used to be widespread and commonly used, so organizations like the AP need to take the lead in updating their stylebook to establish new language standards and promote more respectful and accurate terms.
Cultural Acceptance: Did Society Normalize Harmful Terminology?
The evolution and updating of language used to discuss addiction by influential organizations like the AP show a growing acceptance of the need for change. The widespread embrace of the new language and guidelines reflects an acknowledgment of the significance of using respectful, accurate, and stigma-free language when discussing addiction.
It is essential to recognize that the words “trigger,” “craving,” “codependent,” and “alcoholic” can be interpreted differently and have variable implications for different individuals. While some may consider these terms helpful in expressing their experiences, others may believe they reinforce negative stereotypes or fail to fully capture the complexity of addiction (Pickard, 2020). Therefore, it’s essential to use these words with sensitivity and be willing to adopt language that better represents the diverse experiences within the addiction community.
Moving Forward: Should Terms Like ‘Trigger’ and ‘Alcoholic’ Still Be Used?
I think it’s important to consider the perspectives of individuals who have gone through addiction when deciding whether to keep using words like “trigger,” “craving,” “codependent,” and “alcoholic.” We should use respectful words, put the person first, and not carry any stigma or judgment (Pickard, 2020). It’s also important to be open to changes in language and to consider how our words might affect people suffering from substance use disorders. Our language should show that we understand the medical and psychological aspects of addiction and promote empathy, respect, and dignity for those who are affected.
Reference
Pickard, H. (2020). What we’re not talking about when we talk about addiction. Hastings center report, 50(4), 37-46.