Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court

Overview of Avery’s Denied Tax Deductions

In their article “Attorney’s racing activities fall short of the finish line,” McKinley and Geiszler (2023) discuss the situation with James Avery, an attorney whose claim for tax deductions related to advertising expenditures was later denied by the Tax Court of the United States. Avery had attempted to deduct more than $350,000 for advertising expenses on his tax returns between 2008 and 2013. However, the court denied most of these deductions due to inadequate evidence (McKinley & Geiszler, 2023). Therefore, the court ruled that none of the stated expenses met the specific qualifications to be regarded as usual and necessary business costs.

Use of Racing for Advertising and the Court’s Rejection

Avery had participated in different car shows, attaching a sticker with the Avery Law Firm logo to the back of a racing car to advertise it. The court concluded that Avery’s racing activities were not directly connected to his legal services and were mainly for his own enjoyment.

Tax Filing Irregularities and IRS Actions

Moreover, Avery had neglected to submit tax returns from 2008 to 2009, which had then been filed by the IRS. He eventually filed his returns from 2010 to 2013, but the IRS still sent him a notice of deficiency (McKinley & Geiszler, 2023). The IRS accepted more than $50,000 of the claimed deductions but disallowed the rest.

Personal Enjoyment vs. Business Intent

Finally, the court determined that Avery was not entitled to deduct his racing-related costs as personal expenses since they were not common. Additionally, the court determined that his car collecting and racing activities constituted hobbies and that the decals on his race car were too small to have the same impact as a billboard or newspaper ad. Furthermore, the court found that Avery’s racing activities were motivated by enjoyment, not a desire to advertise his legal services. Therefore, the court denied Avery’s claim of additional advertising expenses.

Reference

McKinley, J., & Geiszler, M. (2023). Attorney’s racing activities fall short of the finish line. Journal of Accountancy. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2025, July 31). Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court. https://studycorgi.com/attorneys-racing-expenses-denied-as-tax-deductions-by-u-s-court/

Work Cited

"Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court." StudyCorgi, 31 July 2025, studycorgi.com/attorneys-racing-expenses-denied-as-tax-deductions-by-u-s-court/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2025) 'Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court'. 31 July.

1. StudyCorgi. "Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court." July 31, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/attorneys-racing-expenses-denied-as-tax-deductions-by-u-s-court/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court." July 31, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/attorneys-racing-expenses-denied-as-tax-deductions-by-u-s-court/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2025. "Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court." July 31, 2025. https://studycorgi.com/attorneys-racing-expenses-denied-as-tax-deductions-by-u-s-court/.

This paper, “Attorney’s Racing Expenses Denied as Tax Deductions by U.S. Court”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.