Introduction
The United States is the beacon of democracy globally and the leading promoter of the democratic system of governance. Through the centuries, it has faced unprecedented challenges that have sought to topple it, and the attack on the Capitol building was no exception. A crowd of former President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021 (Boone et al., 2022).
The Capitol Riot as a Direct Assault on Democracy
The horrific attack claimed the lives of five individuals and damaged the Capitol building (Boone et al., 2022). The attack was an assault on democracy, and political figures, politicians, and individuals all around the nation strongly condemned it. The attack on the Capitol was an attack on democracy, and all those found culpable must serve as an example to never destroy democracy.
The legislative branch of the American government is located at the U.S. Capitol. The Senate and House of Representatives convene here to conduct national business. Law enforcement officers and security professionals have been deployed in large numbers to guard and secure the building and the neighborhood (Trautman, 2021).
For weeks, Trump and his legislative friends, as well as the media, have been hyping the protest (Trautman, 2021). Insisting that he had won the election and that there had been rampant voting fraud, Trump had refused to recognize the results of the vote. Election officials and courts had repeatedly refuted his assertions; nevertheless, he persisted in spreading false information and inciting his supporters.
On January 6, as the demonstration gained momentum, Trump addressed the gathering and urged them to march to the Capitol. He admonished them to “fight like hell” and never give up (Weiner, 2022). Although he did not participate in the protest himself, he promised to be there with them.
As they marched to the Capitol, the crowd got increasingly agitated, and they began fighting with the police who were attempting to keep them out (Dominus & Broadwater, 2022). The mob entered the Capitol and looted, damaged, and ransacked the offices. Attackers aimed to damage the democratic system and the credibility of the 2020 presidential election. Additionally, it assaulted the democratic institutions and symbols at the core of American politics.
Erosion of Democratic Norms and Institutions
The basic principle of free and fair elections is fundamental to democracy. The tenets of democracy also include recognizing the people as the source of power and sovereignty and the equal rights of citizens. It also includes equal opportunities for political participation, fundamental human rights and freedoms, and their recognition, guarantee, and protection by the state (Daly, 2022). The basis of democratic government is the peaceful transition of power through elections.
The attackers on the Capitol wanted to prevent the certification of the electoral college votes, resulting in Joseph Biden being declared the presidential election winner. Without presenting any evidence, the attackers claimed that Donald Trump had won by a wide margin and that the election had been rigged. Even after several courts and unbiased observers refuted this, Trump and his allies continued to make this claim.
This blatant attack on democracy threatens the validity of the democratic process. If people lose faith in the electoral process, they may resort to violence to achieve their political goals (Troutman, 2021). As a result, democratic governance may deteriorate, and authoritarianism may take over.
The attack on the Capitol included a blow to democratic institutions and symbols. The Capitol building is the center of American democracy, where elected officials gather to debate and pass laws. Terrorists wanted to disrupt this operation and prevent Congress from doing its job. Some of them even tried to injure members of Parliament and their staff.
The violation of other democratic symbols accompanied the attack on the Capitol. Carrying the Confederate flag through the halls of the Capitol served as a reminder of bigotry and division. The values of equality and justice that underpin democracy came under direct attack. Legislators gathered to ratify the election results were threatened and intimidated by the flag (Keenan & Zavala, 2021). This was an attempt to undermine democracy and prevent a peaceful power transfer.
The attack on the Capitol also threatened the foundations of democratic government. The rule of law and the peaceful resolution of conflicts are essential to a democratic society. By employing violence to attain their political objectives, the assailants directly undermined the rule of law (Guardian News & Media, 2021). They also tried to undermine the democratic process and the credibility of elections, which posed a risk to the peaceful resolution of disputes.
Democracy depends on built-in checks and balances and the separation of powers. Attacks on the Capitol have targeted this power dynamic and the importance of Congress in the democratic process. In addition, the attack on the Capitol affected American democracy more broadly.
The sharp divisions in American society and the fragility of democratic institutions became apparent (Trautman, 2021). It proved that many Americans are prepared to use violence to attain their political objectives (Trautman, 2021). This poses a danger to the continuity of democratic rule and raises serious concerns about the survival of American democracy.
The Influence of Misinformation and Social Media
The Capitol incident highlighted how social media helped spread and coordinate violent extremism. Terrorists have used social media platforms to coordinate their efforts and disseminate information about their goals. Social media companies should prevent the spread of hate speech and violence on their platforms.
The Capitol incident underscores the urgent need for greater regulation of social media and other online platforms. This incident illustrated the important role of false information in promoting political bigotry and inciting violence. The media informs people about worldwide events (Merchant & Lurie, 2020). In other words, mass media are defined as the continuous delivery of visual, verbal, or aural information to the mass consumer. The means of communication are an instrument of power, for they can quickly and easily enough sway public opinion in favor of certain goals, policies, and the like (Mavrodieva et al., 2019). Each person, seeing the mark of the media in any source on a subconscious level, begins to trust the information transmitted since the basic parameters and activities of the media are determined and established by the legislation of each country.
Erroneous accusations of election fraud and conspiracy theories were rapidly gaining ground on the Internet, especially social media, even before this incident. Several politicians, media outlets, and social media outlets extolled these claims and spread them to their followers. Misinformation attempts to divide the country and wreak havoc as a direct attack on democracy (Kalmoe & Mason, 2022).
Because the assailants manufactured election results that were constantly disproved, the actions were motivated and justified (Kalmoe & Mason, 2022). They felt that their election had been rigged. This is a direct attack on a fundamental principle of democracy that emphasizes the need for truthful information and is protected by the Constitution.
An investigation following the incident revealed that many of the participants had become radicalized as a result of exposure to extremist Internet content, which was amplified by social media algorithms in which interaction is valued above truthfulness. The attack also showed the dangers of confirmation bias and echo chambers, as people’s willingness to explore opposing viewpoints decreased as they were more firm in their beliefs (Trautman, 2021). This produced a favorable climate for propagating misleading information and extremist views (Trautman, 2021). The events at the Capitol underscored the value of media literacy and the ability to think critically to navigate an increasingly complex media environment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the attack on the Capitol building in Washington was a reminder that democracy was built on principles of self-sacrifice. It was a reminder that democracy always faces an existential threat from dissenters who seek to prevent its implementation in the country and a call for vigilance. The attack on this iconic place was an affront to democracy because it is a symbol of legislative power, and on the day in question, it was threatened. In addition, the attack was marred by distrust of the Constitution as the supreme law of the land and an attempt to assert the will of the minority through violence. It threatened the principles of separation of powers and the rule of law, setting a bad precedent for all countries that rely on the U.S. as a beacon of democracy and world leadership.
References
Boone, G. M., Taylor, M. A., & Gallant, L. (2022). International reactions to the Capitol attack of January 6th: A Media frames analysis. American Behavioral Scientist. Web.
Daly, E. (2022). Judicial activitydemocratic activity: the democratising effects of dignity. In Human Dignity and Democracy in Europe (pp. 19-35). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dominus, S., & Broadwater, L. (2022). The Capitol Police and the scars of Jan. 6. The New York Times. Web.
Guardian News and Media. (2021). Congress certifies Joe Biden as next president hours after storming of Capitol. The Guardian. Web.
Kalmoe, N. P., & Mason, L. (2022). Radical American partisanship: Mapping violent hostility, its causes, and the consequences for democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Keenan, O., & Zavala, A. G. (2021). Collective narcissism and weakening of American democracy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 237-258. Web.
Mavrodieva, A. V., Rachman, O. K., Harahap, V. B., & Shaw, R. (2019). Role of social media as a soft power tool in raising public awareness and engagement in addressing climate change. Climate, 7(10), 122. Web.
Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020). Social media and emergency preparedness in response to novel coronavirus. Jama, 323(20), 2011-2012. Web.
Trautman, L. J. (2021). Democracy at risk: Domestic terrorism and attack on the U.S. Capitol. SSRN. Web.
Weiner, R. (2022). Trump told crowd to “fight like hell” before riot. Can he be sued? Washington Post. Web.