Comfort Level with Collaboration and the Peer Review Process
Interaction with colleagues is the successful practice of finding answers to current research questions and problem-solving mechanisms. The peer review process that involves using the opinions of different members of a particular project is one of the forms of such cooperation. My comfort level with collaboration and the peer review process is the form of interaction when the views of all participants without exception are taken into account as possible hypotheses.
I have enjoyed cooperating in the past since this type of work opens up positive prospects for researching a specific topic and helps to establish working contacts with colleagues. My experience includes collaboration with a few classmates, and we have managed to conduct a few surveys jointly and efficiently. I have no examples of unsuccessful work in this direction because my practice has always been productive, and positive results have been achieved through fruitful activities.
Teamwork, Collaboration, and Peer Review Collaboration
Despite similarities in implementation, such concepts as teamwork, collaboration, and the peer review process have some distinctive features. The first phenomenon implies people’s working individually in a team for achieving the same goal, and the final results of activities are summarized and assessed. Collaboration is the process of solving the tasks set jointly by means of all the members’ participation in a certain project. According to LeClair-Smith et al. (2016), the peer review process is the form of activities that is influenced by constructive feedback and is described “as a mechanism to influence learning and professional development” (p. 322). All these features differentiate one concept from another and help to understand their individual peculiarities.
Personal Goals for Peer Review Collaboration
I intend to develop my skills and participate in such projects where the decision-making process depends not only on individual opinions but also on the authoritative assessment of other specialists. It will provide an opportunity to practice comprehensively and fulfill all the goals responsibly, attracting the maximum possible resources. Therefore, such a form of work is a good source of honing personal skills and acquiring valuable experience.
Reference
LeClair-Smith, C., Branum, B., Bryant, L., Cornell, B., Martinez, H., Nash, E., & Phillips, L. (2016). Peer-to-peer feedback: A novel approach to nursing quality, collaboration, and peer review. Journal of Nursing Administration, 46(6), 321-328. Web.