Introduction
Derrick Brown’s poem, “Come Alive” dwells on designing arguments when describing an item. Besides, Anne Lamott the passage “Shitty First Drafts” discusses arguments in terms of the ethos, pathos, and logos. Thus, this reflective treatise attempts to identify critical writing issues that these authors identify in relation to the item Narnia.
Shitty First Drafts: Creating draft in writing
Argument construction is a systematic and dynamic process. The main objective, sub-objectives, and environment influence its process of dissemination. Specifically, Lamott states that this process of evaluation is as a result of the perception of the ideal learning logic and prior experience as guided by planning rubric. Reflectively, basis of the argument construction’s “planning and execution” (Lunsford 29) is due to the need for inclusive interactive process and simplification of concepts in line with the level of interaction (Lamott 94).
Lamott opines that having a well-prepared argument logic plan will ensure that a person is adequately prepared with all the materials that are needed to deliver a properly constructed and easy to interpret sentence (Lamott 94). For instance, “a speaker persuades an audience by the use of stylistic identifications” (Lunsford 31). Thus, the allocation of time for task completion should be adequate to ensure that smooth transition from simple to complex concepts are intact while maintaining flow and sense (Lamott 95).
Reflectively, Lamott’s arguments summarize persuasive ethos, logos, and pathos that decorate a piece of argument to “convince” the audience reading or listening to the premises. Thus, the inclusion of minor and major premises that are artistically incorporated in an argument minimize rhetoric and underrepresented sentence structure components. The main issues identified in this article are a reaction and justification pathos in writing the first draft before aligning the arguments to fit in the final copy. These “argument coloration” (Lamott 95) devises maintain logic and indicate beyond doubt proof of persuasiveness. Moreover, the author triggers a mixed chain of reaction on the strength of an argument and identifies product writing as a result of process writing.
What is Narnia
Language symbols within persuasive elements mentioned in the poem “Come Alive” are shown as the regulator of “emotions and facts” (Brown 40). Brown is categorical on perception and achieving the primary goal of effective communication in his description of Narnia. In writing, ‘the power of language’ should function in relating experience to reality. A positive attitude creates a consistent flow in the argument. For instance, the phrase “Narnia” incorporates the persuasive reasoning of a hypothetical town. The incorporation of positive persuasive language in the description of Narnia is primary in ensuring final understanding and acceptance of the passion of the author about Narnia town (Brown 38).
Since the ability to create distinct emotions in an argument is essential in the final persuasiveness, argument construction is a continuous process that climax upon understanding the underlying premises about the town Narnia (Brown 39). As a result, the reader is placed in an effective and flexible environment that creates room for objective reflection and proactive thinking about reality and imagination of the image Narnia.
In the description of Narnia, the main components of an argument are presented as a message, analytical thinking, deductive reasoning, definition, proper use of phrases, and credibility (ethos). Reflectively, the collaboration of these tools creates an assertive argument that is nonbiased and very objective in the use of rhetoric to present a cognitive expression in the mind of the poet about Narnia.
Works Cited
Brown, Derrick. “Come Alive.” Born in the year of the butterfly knife. Austin: Right Bloody, 2012:38-40. Print.
Lamott, Anne. “Shitty First Drafts.” Language awareness: readings for college writers. Ed. by Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2005: 93-96. Print.
Lunsford, Andrea. The everyday writer, New York, NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2009. Print.