Introduction
Domestic shipping processes in many PICs are in disarray in comparison to international shipping. One of the most challenging and puzzling difficulties facing Pacific archipelagic states is ensuring the supply of appropriate, efficient, and dependable domestic shipping services. The high-quality services that people on remote islands anticipate are often not commercially viable. Nonetheless, providing such services is a governmental, social, and, possibly, economic necessity. Government or extremely small, independent maritime enterprises mainly operate coastal and island-to-island shipping services. Service schedules are regularly neglected, and services are frequently interrupted for months at a time. The ships utilized are generally ancient, incorrectly maintained, in poor shape, and unsuitable for the function for which they are used. PICs have been provided free or heavily discounted ships by development partner governments. Such offers might be very appealing, but unless they are well controlled, their implementation can stifle the growth of commercial shipping sectors and, in the long term, have a detrimental influence on service provision. As there are many issues regarding domestic shipments’ safety, developing strategies to improve it is necessary.
Domestic Shipments’ Safety
For PICTs, safe domestic shipment remains a major concern. Cargo and passenger overload, ship-to-shore customer transfers, and cruise mishaps are all examples of inadequate safety measures. Other difficulties include a lack of passenger and freight terminal facilities, restricted search-and-rescue (SAR) resources and ability, inadequate resource maintenance and lack of suitable maintenance facilities, and a lack of SAR resources and capabilities (World Bank, 2015). Seafarer certification is required for safe, effective, and long-term transportation. It is critical to have well-prepared seafarers in order to ensure the safety of domestic shipping. It also allows PICT seafarers to advance from possibilities outside national borders and thrive on ships of other countries, with the additional benefit of remittances.
There are many challenges faced regarding the safety of domestic ships in the Pacific region. While some of these issues are unavoidable, others can be addressed by regional and local initiatives. Long distances between ports, low trade volumes, low population and distant settlements, imbalanced trade, with export normally significantly outweighing import, and widely different seaports with frequently inadequate money for operation and upkeep are all notable but difficult to solve concerns. (Fenichel et al., 2020). As a result of these considerations, services are relatively costly. PICs are unable to benefit from the scale economies accessible to bigger international ports due to the enormous ranges between ports and limited trade volumes. Costly container placing is a result of the trade imbalance. Because of differences in port infrastructure and a general lack of major cargo-handling equipment, shippers are obliged to employ fairly expensive geared container boats.
Political and economic pressures, poor implementation and enforcement of regulatory standards, and a lack of supplies and service capabilities for boats, machinery, and lifesaving equipment are all significant difficulties that domestic shipping encounters in the Pacific. Governments bear a significant duty to ensure that boats are in safe, seaworthy condition and do not endanger the lives of persons on board. More information on the status of shipping fleets serving the Pacific Islands is needed, and this has been a major roadblock in resolving the problem (OPOC, 2021). One of PICs’ most challenging issues is providing appropriate, efficient, and dependable domestic shipping services. Most routes are commercially problematic, and many are just unprofitable. The ships utilized are occasionally inappropriate, often old, neglected, and poorly shaped (ADB, 2007). Many domestic and commercial boats fail to fulfill recognized safety requirements and, as a result, should be prohibited from service.
Pacific nations are applying to join the Pacific MOU program, which is run by SPC. The Memorandum of Understanding on Flag State Implementation for Domestic Ships was signed by nine PICTS in 2017 (Hills, 2019). The MOU is a local reaction to certain long-standing concerns about domestic ship safety. Through regional standards, instruction of ship safety officers or surveyors, and information sharing, the MoU fosters greater regional cooperation in the provision of safe internal shipping services with decreased environmental effects (SIMA, 2020). The Pacific Islands Domestic Ship Safety (PIDSS) Program of SPC assists PICTs with domestic ship safety issues.
Some progress has been achieved in domestic shipping safety, such as in Tuvalu through the New Zealand-supported ‘Ship to Shore’ effort and in Tonga by the World Bank and Australia-funded Transport Sector Consolidation Project (Hemer et al., 2018). However, these solutions do not meet the major infrastructure requirements of external island ports, as well as other solutions should be found. Given present port equipment, cargo handling organization, and physical qualities of ports, such as approach channel and pavements quality, port efficiency differs by country (Moon, 2013). As a result, establishing a regional port effectiveness baseline is challenging. Ports in Samoa and Tonga, for example, have some private-sector involvement in stevedoring and maintenance of equipment (SPREP, 2018). As compared to ports in Kiribati and Tuvalu, where cargo handling services are supplied by government firms, they have better effectiveness in container ten moves per hour. This means that the private sector handles these issues better in comparison to governmental organizations.
Tonga is working to enhance domestic marine safety as a component of the donation-based Transport Sector Consolidation Project, which was launched in the aftermath of the MV Princess Ashika catastrophe in 2009 (TSCP). The marine industry is also vital for increasing cruise passenger numbers, which is important for the government’s tourist growth and structural reform plans (Gilbert et al., 2018). Additionally, the government is attempting to increase private sector engagement in the marine industry by outsourcing services such as stevedoring and servicing to private enterprises. The achievement of these objectives, particularly in domestic shipping, necessitates continual soft and material expenditures as well as the establishment of a safety culture (SPC, 2011). Effective internal communication between local stakeholders and development partners is required as well. Therefore, the main possible strategy to enhance domestic shipping safety is to develop the private sector and support it.
Conclusion
In conclusion, domestic shipment safety is crucial due to it being a social, economic, and governmental necessity. Nevertheless, there are various issues related to it in the Pacific region that must be solved. The primary issues regard the vessels’ poor condition and the staff’s inability to properly maintain them. This can be solved by educating the safety officers and developing the private sector of shipping. There are already attempts to enhance shipping using these methods, which seem to show positive results. States in the Pacific region shall concentrate on these strategies, and the safety-related issues will eventually be solved.
Reference List
SPREP (2018) Pacific Marine Action Plan: Marine Litter 2018-2015. Apia, Samoa
Hemer, M. et al. (2018) ‘Perspectives on a way forward for ocean renewable energy in Australia’ Renewable energy, 127.
Hills et al. (2019) ‘The disjuncture between regional ocean priorities and development assistance in the South Pacific’ Marine Policy, 107.
Gilbert A, Guillemot N, Andreoli R (2018) ‘Review and recommendations regarding human activity surveillance technologies in Pacific marine protected areas’. AFB and Pacific Biodiversity Blue Belt Project, 140p. (p26)
Fenichel, E.P. et al. (2020) National Accounting for the Ocean and Ocean Economy. World Resources Institute.
ADB. (2007). ‘Oceanic voyages: Shipping in the Pacific’ Asian Development Bank.
Moon, J. R. (2013) ‘Strengthening inter-island shipping in Pacific Island countries and territories: Background paper prepared for UNESCAP’ Suva, Fiji: UNESCAP.
OPOC (2021) Blue Pacific Ocean Report 2021. Web.
SIMA (2020) Solomon Islands Maritime Authority Corporate Plan 2020–2023.
SPC (2011) ‘Framework for Action on Transport Services 2011 to 2020: Improving the efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of Pacific transport services’ Suva, Fiji: Secretariat of the Pacific Community.
World Bank (2015) Pacific Islands supporting safe, efficient and sustainable maritime transport systems. Web.