It seems reasonable to state that waging war has always been an expensive undertaking. What is more, with the flow of time, weapons, armory, and other military equipment – as well as expenses on army maintenance – have become pricier. It is not surprising that recent technical progress provides the opportunity to utilize advanced machines during military conflicts. Among these machines, there are drones that allow minimizing the presence of soldiers at a battlefield. Nevertheless, the issue is still relevant whether the benefits of drones within the given scope outweighed the costs or not.
The crucial point here is that the mentioned drones make it possible to save the lives of many soldiers. Thus, from this perspective, the question is as follows – what price is the government ready to pay to prevent the death of the county’s patriots in the war. It should be admitted that drones, indeed, require substantial investments, which may be a considerable burden on the military budget. However, these machines – if assembled and programmed appropriately – demonstrate a great extent of accuracy, with few numbers of the related civilians’ deaths (Cole, 2016). The latter is inevitable at any war, and it might be assumed that with drones, these deaths will be reduced to a minimum. Hence, if the government is primed to invest in the future of the national army, costs for drones are reasonable, especially if to take into account the issue of saved lives.
To summarize, drones are a significant invention that may be utilized during a war. They can save many lives and have a substantial degree of accuracy. If the country is ready to admit that the hundreds or even thousands of soldiers and civilians worth to be saved, expenses on these drones do not mean a thing.
Reference
Cole, D. (2016). The drone presidency. The New York Review. Web.