Introduction
The opposition between faith and reason has been an issue in theological circles for centuries. Among the many attempts to logically explain and justify the Christian doctrine, St. Thomas Aquinas is still known and placed in high regard. This paper will support Aquinas’ claims and argue that his stance can give faith more authority in academic circles.
St. Thomas Aquinas’ Argument About the Truth of Faith and Reason
St. Thomas Aquinas did not oppose the concepts of faith and reason; instead, outlining the boundaries for the mind in the knowledge of the divine. Aquinas divides the truth about the deity “into the truth of reason and the truth of faith” (Rowe 93). The truth of faith includes the truth about God, which the natural mind also considers proper. The truth, according to Aquinas, includes such statements as: “God exists,” “God is good,” and “God created the world.”
But at the same time, there is a truth that “exceeds all the ability of human reason,” and this truth is essential for human salvation. Since the mind is neutral, this can only be believed in. Moreover, since the adoption of this belief is a free act that is not based on compelled proof, its adherent deserves the reward and favor of God (Rowe 93). Thus, according to Thomas Aquinas, faith and reasoning must interact in such a way that reason must deliver arguments in support of faith by virtue of its capabilities.
Conclusion
Thus, I agree with Aquinas’ view, as it encourages believers to use the scientific method to support their beliefs. This, in my opinion, is a highly productive perspective, as in today’s world, to be considered justified and accurate, any assertions must be supported by some form of evidence. If Christian scientists align themselves with this belief, then Christianity will have more authority in academic circles as new research that supports Christianity emerges.
Works Cited
Rowe, William. Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. 4th ed., Wadsworth/Thomson, 2006.