Introduction
Group therapy can quickly resolve relational issues, especially when the root cause is a lack of trust in others. That is why this therapeutic approach remains necessary for people such as Susanne, who cannot establish normal interpersonal relationships due to their previous experiences of betrayal. Such experiences affect interpersonal relationships and complicate the healing process, thus requiring consideration of complex treatment.
This paper critically analyzes three major interventions employed in Susanne’s therapy sessions: active listening, offering validation and empathy, a form of play therapy where the therapist pretends to be a human and starts to confront Susanne, and finally, the use of the expression of feelings by the therapist, where Susanne is encouraged to show her feelings. The focus will be on the micro-skills used by group leaders. For each intervention, its advantages and shortcomings will be discussed, thereby presenting a thorough analysis of its effectiveness in bringing relational change and healing.
Susanne’s Presenting Issues
The main concern for Susanne may be generalized mistrust, particularly in close relationships, stemming from previous betrayals. This mistrust is presented in her behaviors during the therapy group; she is skeptical and closed off, hinting at the fear of betrayal and emotional pain. Such matters are well illustrated in the group therapy sessions, as shown in the movie by the effects that sharing triggers in Susanne alongside her engagement (King, 2023).
The literature on betrayed persons’ psychological states also poses challenges to the therapy process. It identifies the effect of betrayal as the distortion of interpersonal trust, individuals’ self-image, and emotional experiences (Rokach & Chan, 2023). For this reason, the complexities of these dynamics and their relationship to the development of pertinent therapeutic approaches that can address surface-level and profound emotional injuries become crucial.
Validation and Empathy
Description
Positive attitudes such as validation and empathy play a central role in establishing the therapist-patient relationship when handling a group of patients in a group therapy setting. In the case of Susanne, these micro-skills included the initial consideration of body language and ongoing written communication, as evidenced by the group leader’s active listening and communication techniques, such as the use of reflective statements and empathetic responses, in order to ensure that her emotional state of distress and personal experiences with betrayal were validated.
For example, phrases like “It sounds like you feel deeply hurt,” articulated by the therapist, gave Susanne a sense of being understood and supported (King, 2023). Ghosh et al. (2022) also support this, as they have proposed that empathetic engagement lays the essential groundwork for creating the needed emotional safety, moving more profoundly toward creating rapport between clients and therapists. These techniques help clients like Susanne feel valued and heard, thereby building trust and encouraging them to reveal additional emotions in the context of therapy.
Challenges of Validation and Empathy
Even though validation and empathy are helpful within therapeutic-oriented processes, using these techniques is not easy. In Suzanne’s case, these microskills were demonstrated through the group leader’s active listening and the use of reflective statements and empathic responses, which were crucial for acknowledging her emotional state and validating her experiences of betrayal. Kula et al. (2023) explain how such dependency can prevent individuals from fully resolving their emotional distress, thereby presenting what may be seen as a drawback, in which clients rely on others rather than strengthening their inner coping strategies.
Additionally, moving from empathy to the subsequent, concise problem-solving phase can be tricky, as Schäfer et al. (2024) noted that therapists may find it challenging to switch to directive problem-solving strategies due to their reliance on empathic listening. These challenges require an effective dose of therapeutic intervention that embraces empathy for the patient while avoiding an overemphasis that disenfranchises her and makes her overly dependent on therapeutic engagement.
Symbolic Role Play
Description
According to current knowledge, symbolic role play is a transformative practice in therapeutic processes. It seems to be a powerful means of reconstructing Susanne’s emotional experiences, as it helps her work through emotions that are often not easily expressed when invited to depict the experience inside her in front of the mirror. In the video of King (2023), Susanne participates in an exercise in which she ‘gives back’ her unremitting suffering and infidelity to a figurative, representational figure of a former lover. It also helps avoid direct contact with the libber-load.
Yet, in the same process of avoiding contact, it helps the girl to develop the scenario of paying back emotionally. The efficacy of such role-play interventions is supported by Rønning & Bjørkly (2019), who also noted that role-playing can assist with the management of trauma, as it affords an opportunity, in a safe space, for an individual to interact with his/her traumas. Thus, ‘dumping’ pain can propel Susanne toward wholeness since it offers her – and the community – a concrete way to deal with and express suffering.
Challenges of Symbolic Role Play
While symbolic role-play is helpful, some considerations should be taken to ensure that this instrument is used appropriately, especially with participants experiencing some form of distress; care should be taken to ensure that the exercise does not worsen the participant’s feelings. One risk is retraumatization, especially if the performance’s energized emotional quality is not adequately monitored. What Brøsholen et al. (2022) identify as potentially problematic is vicarious retraumatisation and burnout. Emotional exhaustion and participant burnout may arise during interventions that revisit traumatic experiences unless specific precautions and debriefing protocols are in place (Toseland & Rivas, 2017).
Also, the skills that come with therapists’ expertise are essential, as they are in a position to distinguish between the therapeutic value of play and its negative impact. Frank et al. (2020) highlight the therapist’s actions to ensure that the role play stays within the framework of therapy and to act with care to prevent harm to patients while aiming to do as much good as possible. Thus, exposure to personal and social role play is not only possible but also requires the therapist to use a high level of skill and sensitivity to regulate the emotional tenor of the session so it is helpful rather than detrimental.
Encouraging Expression of Vulnerability
Encouraging vulnerability is a fundamental technique in group therapy to deepen interpersonal connections and foster trust among group members. In Susanne’s case, the therapist employed specific strategies, prompting her to articulate her feelings openly with questions like, “Can you tell us more about what you are feeling?” As King (2023) shows, this technique not only facilitated Susanne’s expression of vulnerability but also validated her emotional experiences, making her feel seen and understood within the group context. Studies validate that open sexual awareness in the way proposed can influence a profound decrease in subject-perceived solitude and increased communal sense among participants (Kula et al., 2023). Significant events of the session included Susanne sharing her story and reflecting on the experience, through which she and other group members found common ground, breaking the cycle of isolation and gradually reconstructing the shattered trust.
Refining Emotional Regulation Through Continuous Feedback Mechanisms
Another equally important aspect in improving therapeutic outcomes for Susanne has been the continuous feedback received through group therapy. In this case, feedback from the therapist and peers follows Susanne’s display of emotions or feelings of helplessness during the staged scenes (King, 2023). Discussed options for behavior modification and receiving instant feedback strengthen new behavioral patterns and give Susanne different views on her actions and feelings. Placing these findings in the course of the therapeutic session, Susanne acquires a multifaceted view of her communication patterns, which is critical for creating new, balanced regulation of emotional patterns.
Advanced Micro-Skills in Group Therapy
Micro-skills are particularly important when treating Susanne’s trust issues, given their ability to strengthen group therapy strategies. One such skill is to refer to how therapists, in particular, employ mirroring and matching techniques when cultivating rapport and understanding. These techniques include therapists mimicking the client’s gestures, vocal pitch, and emotional states to help her feel understood (King, 2023).
The study conducted by Ghosh et al. (2022) reveals that coordinating such timing in group interactions can help participants feel less anxious and more secure about opening up, thereby creating an environment that encourages openness and positivity. Furthermore, using the strategic questioning technique, therapists base their questions on identifying deeper emotions and proactively asserting generalized directions, which have helped Susanne understand the essence of distrust by allowing her to express her feelings freely.
Impact of Targeted Interventions on Susanne’s Recovery
The methods employed in the therapy techniques for Susanne, such as the strategic application of empathy and role play, have helped her recover emotionally considerably. In one way, therapists have also shown her that when they hear, understand, and support her, she is valuable, and these are the building blocks of overcoming betrayal (King, 2023). In addition, since the settings of the role play, as well as their counterpoints, are initially planned to reflect some conflictual or betrayed al scenario regarding Susanne’s interactions, the success with which she is likely to respond and manage reactions and expectations during confrontations reflects the contribution of the treatment activities. Frank et al. (2020) note that such an approach to managing depression helps acquire the first kind of knowledge that enables a person to better understand personal emotional climates and to develop more beneficial interpersonal behaviors in the long run. These combined interventions have consequently elicited considerable relational adaptation in Susanne, whose treatment process has significantly improved by enhancing trust and allowing greater openness.
Conclusion
Using validation and empathy, symbolic role-play, and promoting self-exposure in Susanne’s group therapy sessions presents a diffuse strategy geared towards addressing a range of trust deficits. All the interventions are essential to rebuilding Susanne’s emotional self and trust in therapists, as evidenced by the micro-skills associated with each intervention. Such interventions can be thoughtful in addressing the depicted strength, while the amended challenges describe the potential challenges therapists may encounter in bringing about positive change. This fine detail best illustrates the versatility and capacity for change in group therapy while also underscoring how delicate and sensitive therapy must be to effect such powerful shifts in the client’s essential relational patterns.
References
Brøsholen, P., Ulberg, R., Dahl, H. J., & Thorén, A. (2022). Therapists’ emotional responses in individual therapy with depressed adolescents: An evaluation of the data structure of the feeling-word checklist-28. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15).
Frank, H. E., Becker-Haimes, E. M., & Kendall, P. C. (2020). Therapist training in evidence-based interventions for mental health: A systematic review of training approaches and outcomes. Clinical Psychology: A publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 27(3).
Ghosh, A., Mahintamani, T., Sharma, K., Singh, G. K., Pillai, R. R., Subodh, B. N., Basu, D., & Mattoo, S. K. (2022). The therapeutic relationships, empathy, and satisfaction in teleconsultation for substance use disorders: Better or worse than in-person consultation?. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(5), 457–465.
King, A. (2023). Groupwork for social change assessment task 3. YouTube.
Kula, O., Machluf, R., Shahar, B., Greenberg, L. S., & Bar-Kalifa, E. (2023). The effect of therapists’ enactment interventions in promoting vulnerability sharing in emotion focused couple therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 1-12.
Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023). Love and infidelity: Causes and consequences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5).
Rønning, S. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2019). The use of clinical role-play and reflection in learning therapeutic communication skills in mental health education: an integrative review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 415–425.
Schäfer, S. K., von Boros, L., Schaubruch, L. M., Kunzler, A. M., Lindner, S., Koehler, F., & Tüscher, O. (2024). Digital interventions to promote psychological resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digital Medicine, 7(1), 30.
Toseland, R.W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice, global edition (8th Ed.). Pearson.