Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects

Introduction

For Project 2, I have selected topic 7: “Rail remains a contentious issue in Hawaii, largely for budget reasons. What are the issues? What are some of the possible resolutions?” To my mind, this topic raises questions that are both interesting and important to investigate since the matter under consideration directly relates to our class. The construction of the Honolulu rail has remained among the most controversial subjects at both the local and state levels for several decades.

As we learned from lecture 1, a public good must be non-rivalrous and non-excludable. I would like to relate this issue to Oahu’s rail line construction by explaining the numerous benefits that the completion of the rail can bring. Unfortunately, funding for the project is currently lacking (Cook Lauer 2018). It will be interesting to analyze from the point of public budgeting and consider the necessary measures to complete this endeavor.

Intended Project Topic for Approval

Rail construction has been postponed several times for various reasons. Although the government provides support for necessary projects, Oahu rail has not been the beneficiary of such promotion. The budget shortfall, which constitutes about $3 billion, was not included in President Trump’s list of top projects (Honoré 2017). The continuation of the project is not only necessary but as mentioned in the lecture, the government’s role in providing the good is important.

Thus, it is crucial to analyze both positive and negative externalities to persuade the government to support the project. Another essential aspect to consider is the benefits that the region will realize from the rail transit system (Boeing 2016). The advantages for both citizens and the environment are too great to neglect. Therefore, the analysis of this problem from a public budgeting perspective seems a viable topic for research.

Reference List

Boeing, Geoff. 2016. “Honolulu Rail Transit: International Lessons from Barcelona in Linking Urban Form, Design, and Transportation.” PlaNext 2: 28-47.

Cook Lauer, Nancy. 2018. “Honolulu Rail Project Struggles to Stay on Track.” U.S. News. Web.

Honoré, Marcel. 2017. “Trump Lists Top Projects, Omitting Oahu’s Rail Line.Star Advertiser. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, April 19). Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects. https://studycorgi.com/honolulu-rail-project/

Work Cited

"Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects." StudyCorgi, 19 Apr. 2021, studycorgi.com/honolulu-rail-project/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects'. 19 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects." April 19, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/honolulu-rail-project/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects." April 19, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/honolulu-rail-project/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects." April 19, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/honolulu-rail-project/.

This paper, “Honolulu Rail Project: Positive and Negative Aspects”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.