Investing in the Film "Escape from Rio Japuni" | Free Essay Example

Investing in the Film “Escape from Rio Japuni”

Words: 1087
Topic: Art & Design

Project Proposal 1: My Life with Dalai Lama

When it comes to identifying the viability of the movie, one must mention the fact that it is bound to have rather low production values as it will focus mostly on the life story of the main character, which, though admittedly having a major impact on the society, still lacks the elements that make it spectacular. The general profit of the movie, therefore, can be considered equal to

Profit of the movie . The movie has basically no potential as far as breaking new grounds in the cinema with the introduction of a new character, a plot twist, or any other aspect of the film (Larson, & Gray, 2014).

Project Proposal 2: Heidi

As opposed to the above-mentioned project, the movie in question can be deemed as rather promising in terms of the cast and crew. However, it does not focus on the environmental issues much, either. Likewise, it does not shed much light on either of the issues regarding the merchandise creation and the related marketing options. Based on the ROI index, the movie’s general profit, however, is still greater than the minimum amount set:

The movie’s general profit

Project Proposal 3: The Year of the Echo

Project 3, though seemingly positive as far as its basic elements are concerned, however, fails at some of the criteria set. Particularly, it fails to follow the principle of environmental friendliness, therefore, being harmful to the society. In addition, the project cannot be deemed as acceptable since it is not targeted at the general audience and required parental guidance. Herein the need to dismiss the project in question lies. One must also note that the general profit of the project in question cannot be calculated due to the reasons outlined above (Larson, & Gray, 2014).

Project Proposal 4: Escape from Rio Japuni

The fourth project, in its turn, is much more appropriate as the subject for investment as opposed to the one described above. Moreover, seeing that the movie in question is animated, there is a chance to attract a larger audience than the rest of the films do, i.e., invite entire families to watch the feature mentioned above. In other words, it can be assumed that the film under analysis has rather high chances for being nominated for a variety of awards.

Hence, the ratio of the project is going to be rather high; particularly, it is going to reach the mark of 21%. One must admit, though, that the film is unlikely to leave a tangible mark on the animation department, as breaking new grounds in the contemporary moviemaking will require more substantial funds and more innovative technology. Regardless, it seems that the specified movie should be given the top priority to, in contrast to the rest of the options. Overall, it is going to have a much greater impact on the overall state of the contemporary moviemaking, in general, and the animation department, in particular, which will presuppose lower risks and higher stakes (Larson, & Gray, 2014).

Project Proposal 5: Nadia!

When it comes to defining the weaknesses of the project, one must admit that it cannot possibly use the modern state of the art animation and, therefore, can hardly be viewed as having high potential in terms of visual effects. It should also be noted that the ROI index of the specified project is below the required 22%; therefore, the project under analysis is far from being flawless. Assuming responsibility for its promotion will require taking considerable risks. Therefore, Project 5 should be taken with a grain of salt as a possible source of benefit for the moviemakers involved (Larson, & Gray, 2014).

Project Proposal 6: Keiko—One Whale of a Story

The Keiko project, in its turn, should be credited for the environmental issues that it raises and the fact that it is an animated flick. In other words, it is bound to attract children with its visuals and adults with its themes; consequently, it can be assumed that the specified project is aimed at families. Moreover, the opportunities for selling the related merchandise are truly ample, seeing that the animated characters can appear on a number of products from T-shirts to bags and stationery.

Project Proposal 7: Grand Island

Another promising project, the Grand Island project is likely to target a range of viewers due to the original setting that it offers. The movie should also be credited for the possibility for a relatively small budget yet rather high production values.

Project Priority Evaluation Form

Must objectives Must meet if impacts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Meets all safety and environmental standards Y = yes
N = no
N/A = not applicable
PG or G rating Y = yes
N = no
N/A = not applicable
No adverse effect on other operations Y = yes
N = no
N/A = not applicable
Want objectives Relative Importance 1–100 Single project impact definitions Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score
Be nominated for Best Picture of the Year 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
60 120 0 120 60 120 60
Create a new, major animated character 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
0 40 0 40 20 40 0
Generate additional merchandise 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
0 60 0 60 0 60 0
Raise environmental concerns 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
50 0 0 100 0 100 100
Generate profit greater than 18% 0 < 18%
1 = 18–22%
2 > 22%
70 140 0 140 0 70 0
Advance state of film animation 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
0 40 0 80 0 80 0
Provide basis for new theme ride 0 = No potential
1 = Low potential
2 = High potential
0 0 0 20 20 10 10
Total weighted score
Priority 180 400 0 560 100

As the table above shows, the fourth project, i.e., the movie titled Escape from Rio Japuni is the top priority at present. In other words, investing in the specified venture is bound to trigger a major triumph. Although the scores that it has delivered are also matched by other projects, the total amount of points that it has received display quite graphically that it has to be supported by the investors interested in the further evolution of the movie industry.

Reference List

Larson, E. W., & Gray, G. F. (2014). Organization strategy and project selection. In Project management: The managerial process (5th ed.) (pp. 22-63). New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill. Web.

Ward, K. (2012). Marketing finance. New York City, NY: Routledge. Web.