Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty

When discussing the death penalty, especially for juvenile perpetrators, three concepts are critical: justice, deterrence, and possibility of error. The capital punishment may be seen as just because it causes the same suffering on the criminal as he or she did on his or her victims. However, it also causes undue suffering on the criminal’s friends and family, who are innocent of the crime. This is seen as barbarous and appropriate to a primitive “eye for an eye” notion of justice unfit for a modern society. As a deterrent of future crime, execution is not as effective as a life sentence. Finally, there is always a possibility of error, and if the suspect is already dead, nothing can be done to amend this error.

Specific to juvenile criminals is the fact that their age is a mitigating factor. Before the age of 12, a child must be proven to be capable of formulating criminal intent. As such, one can argue that the suspect’s mental capacity and culpability are diminished, comparable to mentally ill or senile adult suspects. As such, juvenile perpetrators have more arguments against being subject to the death penalty than adults.

In the case of Roper v. Simmons (2005), the Supreme Court argued that juveniles are less responsible for their action than adults. This comes from the argument that juveniles lack the maturity and are more susceptible to negative influences, such as peer pressure, and have less control over their environment. Another major argument was related to consistency, where a strict line between a juvenile and adult was drawn at the age of 18. Additionally, the Court referred to United Nations provisions prohibiting the execution of people under 18, as well as a national sentiment against applying capital punishment to juvenile criminals.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, August 23). Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty. https://studycorgi.com/juvenile-justice-and-the-death-penalty/

Work Cited

"Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty." StudyCorgi, 23 Aug. 2022, studycorgi.com/juvenile-justice-and-the-death-penalty/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty'. 23 August.

1. StudyCorgi. "Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty." August 23, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/juvenile-justice-and-the-death-penalty/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty." August 23, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/juvenile-justice-and-the-death-penalty/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty." August 23, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/juvenile-justice-and-the-death-penalty/.

This paper, “Juvenile Justice and the Death Penalty”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.