Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment

Procedural Facts

Kansas charged the applicant, named James Kahler, with murder after the defendant shot four family members. Kahler’s crime is severe, and the court charges him with the death penalty.

Substantive Facts

James Kahler shot and killed his wife, two joint daughters, and his wife’s grandmother. The crime that caused a public outcry occurred in 2009 in Burlingame, Kansas. The state accused the defendant of murder at trial, which is punishable by death. Moreover, Kahler was charged with aggravated burglary. Kahler’s defense filed evidence and opinions from forensic psychiatrist Steven Peterson during the criminal proceedings (Larkin & Canaparo, 2020). The doctor concluded that Kahler was diagnosed with severe depression, so he could not control his actions and be responsible (Kahler v. Kansas, 2020). However, the prosecution provided the reports of William Logan, another forensic psychiatrist. He declared that the crime committed by Kahler was intentional, and he was accountable for his actions.

Issues

Do the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments allow the insanity defense to be overturned?

Substantive Holding

Insanity or any other mental illness does not count toward the defendant’s defense. Thus, the defendant is accused even if the existence of problems with mental health is proved.

Procedural Holding

The jury convicted the defendant of killing four people, and Kahler was sentenced to death.

Rationale

The court agreed with the Kansas Supreme Court’s decision, arguing that due process does not require a state to pass a mental sanity test. Since this test depends on the ability of the defendant to recognize whether his act was illegal or immoral, Kansas has rejected this practice.

Judgment

If I were a judge, I would agree with the outcome of Kahler v. Kansas. I believe that the eighth and fourteenth amendments cannot regulate the application of the insanity defense in legal cases. Murder is a grave crime and should not be tried under the insanity test.

References

Kahler v. Kansas, No. 18-6135, 589 U.S. ___ (2020).

Larkin Jr, P. J., & Canaparo, G. (2020). Are criminals bad or mad: Premeditated murder, mental illness, and Kahler v. Kansas. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol’y, 43, 85.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, November 30). Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment. https://studycorgi.com/kahler-v-kansas-procedural-facts-issues-and-judgment/

Work Cited

"Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment." StudyCorgi, 30 Nov. 2022, studycorgi.com/kahler-v-kansas-procedural-facts-issues-and-judgment/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment'. 30 November.

1. StudyCorgi. "Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment." November 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/kahler-v-kansas-procedural-facts-issues-and-judgment/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment." November 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/kahler-v-kansas-procedural-facts-issues-and-judgment/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment." November 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/kahler-v-kansas-procedural-facts-issues-and-judgment/.

This paper, “Kahler v. Kansas: Procedural Facts, Issues, and Judgment”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.