Karen Ann Quinlan’s Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma

The management of the needs of patients that are in a vegetative state is, perhaps, one of the most complicated aspects of nursing, not because of the complexity of the life-sustaining processes but because of the ethical dilemma surrounding the subject. Karen Ann Quinlan’s case was one of the most graphic examples of the problem. The case is quite difficult because of the moral uncertainty involved, particularly, the need to act in the best interest of the patient and the necessity to meet the family members’ wishes (i.e., the choice between sustaining Karen’s life as her father’s demand and terminating the life support as the step that seemed morally sensible at the time).

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

It could also be argued that the described scenario represented the physicians’ refusal to take the actions that will ultimately lead to the patient’s death. Indeed, the unwillingness to confront the situations involving the patients’ death is a common source of moral distress that physicians face in the context of the healthcare setting (Guido, 2014).

Since brain death is termed as legal death in the United States, the case also required dealing with certain legal issues. For instance, the legal implications of terminating the life support included murder, hence the reluctance of the hospital staff to accept the family’s wishes (Guido, 2014). The “Right to Die” regulation was produced as a result of the court case filed by the family members (Wolf, Berlinger, & Jennings, 2015).

The case of Karen Ann Quinlan might seem like a prime example of a moral gray area in the context of nursing since it implies that the needs of the patient (i.e., sustaining Karen’s life) and the requirements of her family members (i.e., terminating life support) were obviously conflicting. However, a closer look at the situation will show that Karen’s case boiled down to recognizing the patient’s right to die.

References

Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Wolf, S. M., Berlinger, N., & Jennings, B. (2015). Forty Years of work on end-of-life care – From patients’ rights to systemic reform. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(7). 678-682. Web.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2020, November 20). Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/karen-ann-quinlans-role-in-the-right-to-die-dilemma/

Work Cited

"Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma." StudyCorgi, 20 Nov. 2020, studycorgi.com/karen-ann-quinlans-role-in-the-right-to-die-dilemma/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/karen-ann-quinlans-role-in-the-right-to-die-dilemma/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/karen-ann-quinlans-role-in-the-right-to-die-dilemma/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2020. "Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/karen-ann-quinlans-role-in-the-right-to-die-dilemma/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2020) 'Karen Ann Quinlan's Role in the Right-to-Die Dilemma'. 20 November.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Susan
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
Yes
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
Yes
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!
Yes