Introduction
Most states have several tiers of government because there are so many different tasks that should be done to ensure that citizens’ needs are met. The structure of authority in a state is profoundly affected by its number of governments. The central issue concerns the division of different categories of government in their respective responsibilities for carrying out public functions. South Africa has national, provincial, and municipal levels of government. South Africa’s cooperative governance principles are part of a radiant approach to harmonizing the performance of all levels of government so that even the smallest spheres have a voice on issues that affect them.
Services Provided by the Three Different Spheres of Government
People’s needs and the rising requirements motivate government institutions to provide critical services. There should be a system to ensure that government institutions offer essential services to sustain and improve a society’s standard of living. Certain organizational choices should be made for this structure before it can accomplish the scheduled tasks (Atkinson, 2018). This is why there are three branches of government in South Africa’s system: the national, provincial, and local governments. Each of the nine separate provincial administrations is accountable for providing a particular set of services on a regional or statewide scale. The local government sector is responsible for providing services to residents of a given area.
Services like security, education, healthcare, and defense are examples of what the national government provides to its citizens. Ambulance service, animal care, and public library maintenance all fall within the jurisdiction of the respective provincial government. Water, garbage collection, and electrical infrastructure are all services that fall within the purview of municipal administrations. This ensures that the government creates the regulatory and social framework required to operate a market economy effectively (Sabiti, 2018). Designers classify the functions of the departments of public safety, national defense, corrections, and the judiciary under security services. The purpose of protective services is to safeguard citizens and their property from harm both inside and outside of the country.
Services offered by government agencies like the Department of Commerce and Industry or the Department of Agriculture and Forestry contribute to the creation of state-level wealth. The ability to make a living is what these programs aim to help people achieve. Creating a stable national economy from the bottom up is a part of this approach. Additionally, this class of services covers the provision of passable streets. Wealth itself is not something the government generates; rather, it merely provides the conditions for its creation (Atkinson, 2018). Housing, medical care, and retirement benefits are examples of services provided by the public welfare and health sector. The provision of aid to society’s underprivileged to better their standard of living falls under this category of services.
People who lack the financial resources to ensure the safety of themselves and their dependents benefit from the provision of housing. Pensions, or social security, are designed to help people who have lost their jobs or been injured. Clinical, nursing, hospital, mental fitness, dental, occupational, environmental, and community health care are all examples of medical services that the government provides. The term ‘cultural and educational benefits’ refers to activities that aim to improve a community’s intellectual, moral, artistic, religious, and recreational well-being (Sabiti, 2018). These services can range from those delivered directly to those that provide aid to people, communities, or even the larger society. Education and training, building human resources, expanding scientific knowledge, and popularizing leisure activities all fall under this category.
Environmental protection services aim to ensure everyone lives in a healthy and safe setting. Unchecked human population expansion, increased urbanization and industrialization, diminished natural resources, intensified pollution, and uncontrolled ecological damage pose severe threats to human health and the physical environment (Atkinson, 2018). All countries today are aware of the developing ozone hole. The government’s environmental protection and improvement roles are as important as its regulatory functions.
South Africa’s Basic Health Care Service and Its Three Levels of Government
To fulfill their constitutional mandate and ensure that all citizens of South Africa have access to quality healthcare, the three branches of government should work together in harmony and cooperation. The constitution and the National Health Act grant the National Department of Health the authority to oversee clinical welfare in South Africa and coordinate medical policy nationally. Health policy and regulations should be drastically revised to ensure that all patients receive the care they are entitled to (Maphumulo & Bhengu, 2019). Public medical facilities still fail to satisfy fundamental care requirements and patients’ expectations, despite the government setting many admirable targets to improve the level of service provided in healthcare settings. This has led to people no longer having faith in the medical system. Most South Africans believe their country’s healthcare system is broken and needs improvement.
Similar to other developing nations, South Africa has reorganized its health care system using a decentralized approach. In South Africa, there are three tiers of government responsible for managing health services: the national, provincial, and local levels. To ensure that decentralization improves local organizations’ ability to engage with central government institutions for enhanced resource distribution to previously overlooked populations, all three levels of administration should work in synchronization and collaboration. The breakdown in health care delivery in South Africa may be traced back to the disconnection between those who shape policy and those who carry it out (Ngobeni et al., 2020). Since provincial policy implementers cannot place limits on health spending, political objectives have resulted in medical budgets being reallocated.
The three levels of government should cooperate to improve the quality of services for local governments to fulfill their constitutional duty. In addition, all three branches of government should make a concerted effort to eliminate favoritism and corruption in key decision-making processes like hiring and contracting. There is a dire need for improvements to the status of public facilities, as they do not promote the provision of high-quality healthcare (Winchester & King, 2018). As a result, decentralization should be done with caution when it has been established that there is adequate managerial competence at the district level. Top officials should be penalized when they fail to offer quality services as needed by their scope of work.
Three Categories of Municipalities
Within the framework of the new local governance system, various types of municipalities are accommodated. Moreover, the constitution mandates that national legislation outline the many types of municipalities that may be founded within each of the three groups of governance that it specifies (Ndevu & Muller, 2018). The constitution defines three types of municipalities (A, B, and C) in this regard. A-class municipality has complete control over local administration and legislation. Category B municipality is coterminous with Category C and hence shares executive and legislative jurisdiction over municipal matters within its area. A municipality under category C has administrative power over a region that comprises several municipalities (Gcora & Chigona, 2019). Additionally, a district municipality is the umbrella word for a municipality in category C. According to the new structure of local administration, there are three types of municipalities: metropolitan, district, and local councils.
Primary local governments include metropolitan and regional councils, while district councils are considered secondary because they are made up of officials from local governments. The eight largest South African cities each have metropolitan governments or metros. District municipalities are subdivided into smaller local units for areas outside major metropolitan regions (Ndevu & Muller, 2018). All municipalities, with the exception of district municipalities, have ward structures. South Africa has two hundred and seventy-eight municipalities, including eight metropolitan, 44 district councils, and 226 local municipalities (Ndevu & Muller, 2018). Their primary goals are to strengthen local economies and meet the needs of communities through the development of necessary infrastructure and the provision of essential services.
Conclusion
Society gains the physical infrastructure for the creation of prosperity through the construction of suitable networks. Health care in South Africa can be significantly improved if the three branches of government work together to implement a slew of innovations and programs to raise standards across the board. Therefore, the constitution plays a crucial role in determining the types of municipalities that can be founded and the categories of administrative authorities that can be established. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between various municipal forms. According to the constitution, category A municipality is the sole municipal council in a conurbation and has complete control over the local executive and legislative affairs.
References
Atkinson, D. (2018). Fracking in a fractured environment: Shale gas mining and institutional dynamics in South Africa’s young democracy. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 441-452.
Gcora, N., & Chigona, W. (2019). Post-implementation evaluation and challenges of integrated financial management information systems for municipalities in South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1-12. Web.
Maphumulo, W. T., & Bhengu, B. R. (2019). Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review. Curationis, 42(1), 1-9.
Ndevu, Z. J., & Muller, K. (2018). Operationalizing performance management in local government: The use of the balanced scorecard. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 1-11. Web.
Ngobeni, V., Breitenbach, M. C., & Aye, G. C. (2020). Technical efficiency of provincial public healthcare in South Africa. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 18(1), 1-19.
Sabiti, M. (2018). Decentralization and good governance in Africa: A critical review. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(2), 22-32. Web.
Winchester, M. S., & King, B. (2018). Decentralization, healthcare access, and inequality in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Health & Place, 51, 200-207.