Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy

Background and Key Objectives: Pressure Ulcers and Protocols

  • Pressure ulcers (PUs): common occurrence in inpatients;
  • PUs management: essential task for any hospital nurse;
  • Cost of care for PUs: excessively high because of health complications;
  • Mitigation of the risk of PUs development as the current priority;
  • Patient safety levels: current health concern in hospitals.

Research Questions: What the Study Seeks to Explore

  • Handling the problem of PUs as a complex process;
  • Necessity to take a vast array of factors into consideration;
  • Can PU protocols prevent the development of PUs?
  • How high are the expenses of using PUs in the hospital setting?
  • Is the use of PU protocols an efficient strategy against PUs?
  • What crucial obstacles must be overcome in using PU protocols?

Problem Statement: Shedding Light on the Issue

  • Emergency departments: increased level of PU development risk;
  • Populations affected extensively by PUs: hospitalized patients;
  • Key problem: absence of a coherent and effective strategy against PUs development;
  • PU protocols as one of the possible prevention tools;
  • Hence the need to test the impact of PU protocols’ use in a hospital setting.

Hypothesis: Determining a Possible Solution to PUs

  • PUs as a more efficient approach that institutionalized care for PUs management;
  • PU protocols as the means of avoiding, managing, and preventing PUs;
  • Close connection between the frequency of preventive care and positive patient outcomes;
  • Variables: preventive care tools (independent); patient outcomes (dependent);
  • Tests: comparison of pre- and post-utilization information about patients’ well-being.

Literature Review: Traditional Methods of PUs Prevention

  • Silicone foam dressing as one of the most common tools for PUs management;
  • Traditional protocol: repositioning of soft padding for the management of PUs;
  • 42.9% effectiveness in application of silicone foam for managing 42.9% (Truong, Grigson, Patel, & Liu, 2016);
  • Lower net costs for silicone foam casts compared to other tools;
  • Problems: length of implementation.

Literature Review: Financial Feasibility of PU Protocols

  • Changes to standard protocols and tools for managing Pus in patients (Cano et al., 2015);
  • Hill-Rom Advanced Microclimate Technology Mattresses as the key material (Cano et al., 2015);
  • Following drop in the development of Pus in the hospital setting;
  • Advantages: relative cheapness and high efficiency (Swafford, Culpepper, & Dunn, 2016);
  • Problem: lack of research regarding traditional and innovative protocols.

Literature Review: Barriers in Establishing Protocol-Based PU Management

  • PUs prevention: necessity to locate obstacles and strategies for their management (Worsley, Clarkson, Bader, & Schoonhoven, 2016);
  • PUs prevention problems: recent drop in nurse education quality;
  • PUs prevention concerns: professional boundaries limiting nurses’ actions;
  • PUs management techniques: focus on avoiding the problem.

Research Methods: Essential Information

  • Research design: adoption of the mixed method as the most effective one;
  • Target demographic; 40 immobile patients with the propensity toward PUs (Liu, Moody, Traynor, Dyson, & Gall, 2014);
  • Two groups: control group (traditional tools) and intervention groups (protocols) (Clark et al., 2014);
  • Qualitative interview: strategy for determining barriers to effective practice;
  • Thematic analysis as the basis for conducting qualitative research (Cano et al., 2015).

Research Results Discussion and Analysis of the Findings

  • Participants experiencing high risks of developing PUs;
  • Mobility subscale as the key measurement tool for determining the threat of PUs (ProHealth Wound Care, n.d.);
  • Effectiveness of the intervention: standardized PU classification scale;
  • Intervention outcomes: stage 1 PU in 20% of patients; stage 2 in 10% of patients;
  • Control group: twice as high levels of PUs development.

Conclusion: Implications for Further Research

  • Limitations: comparatively low number of participants;
  • Research outcomes: initial hypothesis confirmed;
  • Necessity for developing a comprehensive PUs management framework;
  • Positive effects of hospital managers on PUs prevention;
  • Patient education as one of the crucial steps toward PUs prevention.

References

Cano, A., Anglade, D., Stamp, H., Joaquin, F., Lopez, J. A., Lupe, L., … Young, D. L. (2015). Improving outcomes by implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program (PUPP): Going beyond the basics. Healthcare, 3(3), 574–585.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Clark, M., Black, J., Alves, P., Brindle, C. T., Call, E., Dealey, C., & Santamaria, N. (2014). Systematic review of the use of prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcers. International Wound Journal, 11(5), 460-471.

Liu, L. Q., Moody, J., Traynor, M., Dyson, S., & Gall, A. (2014). A systematic review of electrical stimulation for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in people with spinal cord injuries. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 37(6), 703-718.

ProHealth Wound Care. (n.d.). Risk for pressure ulcers [Image]. Web.

Swafford, K., Culpepper, R., & Dunn, C. (2016). Use of a comprehensive program to reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care, 25(2), 152-155.

Truong, B., Grigson, E., Patel, M., & Liu, X. (2016). Pressure ulcer prevention in the hospital setting using silicone foam dressings. Cureus, 8(8), e730. Web.

Worsley, P. R., Clarkson, P., Bader, D. L., & Schoonhoven, L. (2016). Identifying barriers and facilitators to participation in pressure ulcer prevention in allied healthcare professionals: A mixed methods evaluation. Physiotherapy, 103(3), 304-310.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More
Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, July 10). Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/management-of-pressure-ulcers-using-protocols-as-the-key-strategy/

Work Cited

"Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy." StudyCorgi, 10 July 2021, studycorgi.com/management-of-pressure-ulcers-using-protocols-as-the-key-strategy/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy." July 10, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/management-of-pressure-ulcers-using-protocols-as-the-key-strategy/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy." July 10, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/management-of-pressure-ulcers-using-protocols-as-the-key-strategy/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy." July 10, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/management-of-pressure-ulcers-using-protocols-as-the-key-strategy/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Management of Pressure Ulcers: Using Protocols as the Key Strategy'. 10 July.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Susan
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
Yes
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
Yes
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!
Yes